Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

May 28 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Getting to Know Susana
From the February 20, 2012, issue of NR

By Jay Nordlinger


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send

Susana and friend (Susan Montoya Bryan/AP)


Text  

Santa Fe, N.M — In her spacious office on the top floor of the “Roundhouse,” as the state capitol is called, Governor Susana Martinez greets a group of schoolchildren. Excitedly, they have their picture taken with her. As they leave, she calls out to them, “Be good!” One of the teachers answers, “You too!” She says, “I’m trying my best, every day.” After they leave, the governor says how enjoyable it is to meet and mingle with happy schoolchildren: It’s one of the nicest parts of her job. In her former job, as a district attorney, she often met with children who were far from happy: They were victims of crime. She has seen a lot in her career, as prosecutors and other law-enforcement people tend to. 

Advertisement

Susana Martinez was elected governor of New Mexico in 2010. For those keeping score, she is the first Hispanic woman to be the governor of any state. A conservative Republican, she is a star of her party, nationally. There is even talk that she should be the vice-presidential nominee this year. She has said, firmly, that she wouldn’t accept the position: She is committed to her state and her term. Besides which, you could say, it’s way too early for Martinez to be on a national ticket: She has had just a year as governor. Still, you can forgive Republicans their excitement over this woman, whose gifts and appeal are undeniable. 

She was born in El Paso, Texas, in 1959, and she was raised in that city too. Her father was a Marine, a Golden Gloves boxing champion, a deputy sheriff, and, finally, a businessman. One of the governor’s great-grandfathers was Toribio Ortega, a general in the Mexican Revolution. When in high school, she was the student-council president. She went to the University of Texas at El Paso, and then to the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Why did she go to law school? When she was a child, she noticed that congressmen and senators tended to be lawyers. She herself was interested in a life of politics and public service. She never had a doubt that she would go to law school.

Her parents were Democrats, she was a Democrat, and so was just about everyone they knew. But the Martinezes were conservatives. The future governor was raised very strictly, she says, with her parents emphasizing education and hard work. She and her brother went to Catholic schools. She had the great responsibility of helping to care for her sister, who was “special needs,” as she says: She bathed her, slept with her, and so on. Then, too, there was the fact that her parents were running a business. It was a security-guard company, which began with three employees: Mom, Dad, and Susana. Her parents realized, she says, “how much of their own capital they needed to keep in order to go after the next contract.” They also realized how jobs were created. Eventually, the company grew to 125 employees in three states.

Martinez remembers that her father once “sheepishly” admitted that he had voted for Reagan. Susana voted for Reagan, too. She says she has always been a believer in looking at the individual, and crossing party lines “as you see fit.”

In 1986, she began her life in New Mexico, moving to Las Cruces. She worked in the DA’s office. Then, in the mid-Nineties, she decided to run for DA herself. Two Republican leaders in the county invited her to lunch. She said to her husband, “I know what they want.” (Her husband is Chuck Franco, a former undersheriff, now referred to by the governor as “the First Gentleman.”) “They want us to change parties. Here’s what we’re going to do: We’re going to be nice to them, we’re going to let them buy us lunch, we’re going to thank them, and we’re never going to see them again.” Over lunch, the group discussed a range of issues: crime, welfare, the Second Amendment, economic policy, the works. Afterward, Martinez looked at her husband and said, “I’ll be damned: We’re Republicans. Now what?” The problem was, the county was three to one Democratic. The state as a whole is overwhelmingly Democratic. A life in politics seemed challenging, at best. But after a while, Martinez said, “We’ve got to be true to ourselves. Let’s re-register.” She won her first election, and was reelected three times.

1   2   3   4   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Costa: Rand Rises

Bolduc: Senate Free-for-All in Minnesota

Editors: Sink with California

Botwinick: The ACLU’s Double Standard

Costa: Goodbye, Newt

Fund: Hatch Heading for a Fall?



COMMENTS   34

EXPAND  

History Buff
   02/21/12 08:27

A smart Palin. A much smarter Bachmann. There's your hope for 2016, Republicans. Not Yet Another White Guy.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Todd M
   02/21/12 11:44

I like the NM gov as well. The prior one, Richard, should be in prison. What is the much smarter than Bachmann swipe and the "not another white guy" bigotry? As far as Palin, if she keeps talking about "brokered conventions" then she can get lost. We have four people running - let the voters decide not the GOP or Jeb Bush. I like Rick Santorum but let the voters vote and no more Romney/GOP funny business like Iowa or Maine.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
History Buff
   02/21/12 16:53

1. To consider the woman who thought John Quincy Adams was a "Founder" at age twelve...."smart"...i.e. Bachmann, is beyond credulity.

2. It's not bigotry...it's smart politics. Why all the talk about Marco Rubio? If not the GOP knowing they desperately need to appeal to Latino voters. Well, they also desperately need to appeal to female voters...Susana Martinez fulfills both roles.

3. I too as a Democratic-leaning voter want the GOP to nominate Rick Santorum. Removing your ideological blinders, you might see how Moderates and Independents might not be particularly attracted to a guy obsessed with male homosexuality, who thinks contraception is "dangerous", and who has basically telegraphed his intention as soon as Inaugurated to start a disasterous war with Iran.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 18:50

You really should start paying closer attention. The only time "Palin keeps talking about a brokered convention" is when she has been asked about it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
justunfair
   02/21/12 12:23

History Buff ---- your ignorance and racism are showing through your democrat appearance.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Vader
   02/21/12 13:43

"Not Yet Another White Guy."

You think there's something wrong with white guys?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 13:56

No need to diss Palin to compliment Martinez.

Did you miss the part where the only prominent national figure to back Martinez in the primary was Palin?

Did you miss that?

So I'd say Palin was pretty smart to spot this talent - even before Jay Nordlinger or the National Review did.

Wouldn't you?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Russ Davis
   02/21/12 08:56

If there's any need for proof the GOP is as dangerous as Dems its the deluded ungodly notion now popular there that it's proper for women to be in the military or in authority over men in any of the branches of government (think O'Connor, Ginsbuirg, Sottomayor & Kagan for how wonderful that bs has been! and conservatives are little better for those who know what they're talking about), stupidly imagining we're superior to the Founders' imagined backwards bigotry in this regard when the reverse is the case, for anyone not opposed to this corrupt notion hates women and men and families and is historically and Biblically illiterate and blind to the destruction this causes. God save us.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
JaneB
   02/21/12 11:21

Heaven help you, Mr. Davis.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mike in Mad City
   02/21/12 15:26

Uh, I'll just leave my response at this: if you really think you can honestly compare a woman like Martinez to the likes of an O'Connor, Ginsbuirg, Sottomayor or Kagan, then nothing any of the rest us can say is of any use to you, and there really is no discussion to have.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
TexasCurmudgeon
   03/07/12 16:18

Mike, you're right, but I think Mr. Davis's real problems lie on a deeper level.

And for your information and his: "Ginsburg" and "Sotomayor."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
John Banner
   02/21/12 10:19

If Santorum wins the nomination, he is going to be hit with a barage of "anti-woman" hysteria. A choice of Governor Martinez as Vice President may well be the best way for him to counter that meme in the general election. Plus, if he announces it soon enough, he may prevent Obama from dumping Biden for Hillary.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 13:58

Did you miss the part - I think it's mentioned at least twice in the article - where Martinez said she would not accept a VP offer in 2012?

Did you miss that?

Reading these comments really makes me weep for the lack of critical reading skills in this country.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 10:20

More Neocon, ethnic, "diversity", open borders/mass immigration cheerleading. Hoo-ray, there is on American Latino who isn't a rabid left-wing, Chavez style Marxist.

Only problem, there are tens of millions of Latinos in oru country who are.

As Pat Buchanan so correctly says - "Either the GOP will put an end to mass immigration or mass immigration will put an end to the GOP". Wisr words were never spoken.

You can not have a limited government, constitutional republic when you invite tens of millions of poor, grade school educated peasants into your country (never mind all their law breaking).

Deportation is the only solution but the Establishment GOP'ers can't fathom it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 GWB
   02/21/12 13:14

Did you not read where she goes on the stump to show latinos (and others) that they are more conservative than they think, and much more so than the Democrats?

Not sure at all where your first sentence comes from - certainly not anything in the article.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 14:01

Thank you, GWB.

These comments are stunning in their obvious lack of knowledge of the very article upon which they are commenting.

It is clear from the article that Martinez is a hardliner against illegal immigration and a firm supporter of legal immigration.

I wish people would read the whole article (I know it's probably too much to expect someone to click through 4 pages - sigh) before commenting.

It's a very good article, Jay. I read the whole thing. Thanks.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 21:34

hrh40:

Being "a firm supporter of legal immigration" is a strong indication of thoughtlessness on the subject.

In contrast, here's what the late conservative writer Sam Francis had to say about the mostly irrelevant distinction between legal and illegal immigration:

"If the only problem with illegal immigration is that it's illegal, if you're not willing to say mass immigration by itself is a problem, then why should we have any laws against it at all?"

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 22:37

Sorry to use actual facts Nessus, but the vast majority of our European immigrant forefathers were "poor, grade school educated peasants."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 21:21

What a silly remark, Homer. You think there's some benefit to this country, in the 21st century, to be important legions of high-school dropouts, or their equivalent? We already have plenty home-grown dropouts, anyway.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   02/21/12 10:32

Dear Russ Davis:

I had to read your post numerous times to be sure I was reading correctly; wherein you suggest that its wrong (likely Biblically) that women should serve in the military or that they should not attain leadership positions in government.

I categorically state otherwise sir. I think the heart and soul of some female leaders are in the right place to serve without malice, forthought or propitious self-gain.

Having vacationed extensively (and own property) in New Mexico, I can tell you that things do need to change there and its very likely the changes will occur under Susana's watch. I do look forward to the improvements she knows she can make.

As to GOP, well, as a life long conservative, the GOP is just a name for a history of the conservative movement. I prefer not to belong to a history lesson and would rather vote the conservative ticket. Primarily because its what our founders (yes, I'm a tea-partier) would have done and because I know that I alone (along with you) are responsible for my own prosperity and security; not the government.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact