Santa Fe, N.M — In her spacious office on the top floor of the “Roundhouse,” as the state capitol is called, Governor Susana Martinez greets a group of schoolchildren. Excitedly, they have their picture taken with her. As they leave, she calls out to them, “Be good!” One of the teachers answers, “You too!” She says, “I’m trying my best, every day.” After they leave, the governor says how enjoyable it is to meet and mingle with happy schoolchildren: It’s one of the nicest parts of her job. In her former job, as a district attorney, she often met with children who were far from happy: They were victims of crime. She has seen a lot in her career, as prosecutors and other law-enforcement people tend to.
Advertisement
Susana Martinez was elected governor of New Mexico in 2010. For those keeping score, she is the first Hispanic woman to be the governor of any state. A conservative Republican, she is a star of her party, nationally. There is even talk that she should be the vice-presidential nominee this year. She has said, firmly, that she wouldn’t accept the position: She is committed to her state and her term. Besides which, you could say, it’s way too early for Martinez to be on a national ticket: She has had just a year as governor. Still, you can forgive Republicans their excitement over this woman, whose gifts and appeal are undeniable.
She was born in El Paso, Texas, in 1959, and she was raised in that city too. Her father was a Marine, a Golden Gloves boxing champion, a deputy sheriff, and, finally, a businessman. One of the governor’s great-grandfathers was Toribio Ortega, a general in the Mexican Revolution. When in high school, she was the student-council president. She went to the University of Texas at El Paso, and then to the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Why did she go to law school? When she was a child, she noticed that congressmen and senators tended to be lawyers. She herself was interested in a life of politics and public service. She never had a doubt that she would go to law school.
Her parents were Democrats, she was a Democrat, and so was just about everyone they knew. But the Martinezes were conservatives. The future governor was raised very strictly, she says, with her parents emphasizing education and hard work. She and her brother went to Catholic schools. She had the great responsibility of helping to care for her sister, who was “special needs,” as she says: She bathed her, slept with her, and so on. Then, too, there was the fact that her parents were running a business. It was a security-guard company, which began with three employees: Mom, Dad, and Susana. Her parents realized, she says, “how much of their own capital they needed to keep in order to go after the next contract.” They also realized how jobs were created. Eventually, the company grew to 125 employees in three states.
Martinez remembers that her father once “sheepishly” admitted that he had voted for Reagan. Susana voted for Reagan, too. She says she has always been a believer in looking at the individual, and crossing party lines “as you see fit.”
In 1986, she began her life in New Mexico, moving to Las Cruces. She worked in the DA’s office. Then, in the mid-Nineties, she decided to run for DA herself. Two Republican leaders in the county invited her to lunch. She said to her husband, “I know what they want.” (Her husband is Chuck Franco, a former undersheriff, now referred to by the governor as “the First Gentleman.”) “They want us to change parties. Here’s what we’re going to do: We’re going to be nice to them, we’re going to let them buy us lunch, we’re going to thank them, and we’re never going to see them again.” Over lunch, the group discussed a range of issues: crime, welfare, the Second Amendment, economic policy, the works. Afterward, Martinez looked at her husband and said, “I’ll be damned: We’re Republicans. Now what?” The problem was, the county was three to one Democratic. The state as a whole is overwhelmingly Democratic. A life in politics seemed challenging, at best. But after a while, Martinez said, “We’ve got to be true to ourselves. Let’s re-register.” She won her first election, and was reelected three times.
I like the NM gov as well. The prior one, Richard, should be in prison. What is the much smarter than Bachmann swipe and the "not another white guy" bigotry? As far as Palin, if she keeps talking about "brokered conventions" then she can get lost. We have four people running - let the voters decide not the GOP or Jeb Bush. I like Rick Santorum but let the voters vote and no more Romney/GOP funny business like Iowa or Maine.
1. To consider the woman who thought John Quincy Adams was a "Founder" at age twelve...."smart"...i.e. Bachmann, is beyond credulity.
2. It's not bigotry...it's smart politics. Why all the talk about Marco Rubio? If not the GOP knowing they desperately need to appeal to Latino voters. Well, they also desperately need to appeal to female voters...Susana Martinez fulfills both roles.
3. I too as a Democratic-leaning voter want the GOP to nominate Rick Santorum. Removing your ideological blinders, you might see how Moderates and Independents might not be particularly attracted to a guy obsessed with male homosexuality, who thinks contraception is "dangerous", and who has basically telegraphed his intention as soon as Inaugurated to start a disasterous war with Iran.
If there's any need for proof the GOP is as dangerous as Dems its the deluded ungodly notion now popular there that it's proper for women to be in the military or in authority over men in any of the branches of government (think O'Connor, Ginsbuirg, Sottomayor & Kagan for how wonderful that bs has been! and conservatives are little better for those who know what they're talking about), stupidly imagining we're superior to the Founders' imagined backwards bigotry in this regard when the reverse is the case, for anyone not opposed to this corrupt notion hates women and men and families and is historically and Biblically illiterate and blind to the destruction this causes. God save us.
Uh, I'll just leave my response at this: if you really think you can honestly compare a woman like Martinez to the likes of an O'Connor, Ginsbuirg, Sottomayor or Kagan, then nothing any of the rest us can say is of any use to you, and there really is no discussion to have.
If Santorum wins the nomination, he is going to be hit with a barage of "anti-woman" hysteria. A choice of Governor Martinez as Vice President may well be the best way for him to counter that meme in the general election. Plus, if he announces it soon enough, he may prevent Obama from dumping Biden for Hillary.
More Neocon, ethnic, "diversity", open borders/mass immigration cheerleading. Hoo-ray, there is on American Latino who isn't a rabid left-wing, Chavez style Marxist.
Only problem, there are tens of millions of Latinos in oru country who are.
As Pat Buchanan so correctly says - "Either the GOP will put an end to mass immigration or mass immigration will put an end to the GOP". Wisr words were never spoken.
You can not have a limited government, constitutional republic when you invite tens of millions of poor, grade school educated peasants into your country (never mind all their law breaking).
Deportation is the only solution but the Establishment GOP'ers can't fathom it.
Did you not read where she goes on the stump to show latinos (and others) that they are more conservative than they think, and much more so than the Democrats?
Not sure at all where your first sentence comes from - certainly not anything in the article.
Being "a firm supporter of legal immigration" is a strong indication of thoughtlessness on the subject.
In contrast, here's what the late conservative writer Sam Francis had to say about the mostly irrelevant distinction between legal and illegal immigration:
"If the only problem with illegal immigration is that it's illegal, if you're not willing to say mass immigration by itself is a problem, then why should we have any laws against it at all?"
What a silly remark, Homer. You think there's some benefit to this country, in the 21st century, to be important legions of high-school dropouts, or their equivalent? We already have plenty home-grown dropouts, anyway.
I had to read your post numerous times to be sure I was reading correctly; wherein you suggest that its wrong (likely Biblically) that women should serve in the military or that they should not attain leadership positions in government.
I categorically state otherwise sir. I think the heart and soul of some female leaders are in the right place to serve without malice, forthought or propitious self-gain.
Having vacationed extensively (and own property) in New Mexico, I can tell you that things do need to change there and its very likely the changes will occur under Susana's watch. I do look forward to the improvements she knows she can make.
As to GOP, well, as a life long conservative, the GOP is just a name for a history of the conservative movement. I prefer not to belong to a history lesson and would rather vote the conservative ticket. Primarily because its what our founders (yes, I'm a tea-partier) would have done and because I know that I alone (along with you) are responsible for my own prosperity and security; not the government.