| NATIONAL
REVIEW May 1, 2000 Issue Are We Still America? National Review Editorial on Elian, May 1, 2000 By NR's editors |
|
|
|
There is the careful, ominous silence from Clinton himself. (Do you really think our president would have anything to do with this dirty stuff? No, no; it’s just some overzealous underlings.) There are, alas, impeachment-whipped congressional Republicans, dithering and ducking, anxiously checking their polls; and congressional Democrats, already practicing their triumphant sneers. There is the Democratic presidential candidate, triangulating wildly; and there is the Republican candidate, saying approximately the right things but very, very q-u-i-e-t-l-y. Lost in all this is any conception that America has a role of moral leadership to play, and that this has been an excellent opportunity to play it. How one longs for someone—anyone—in our public life to stand up and say those things that the Clintons and Renos will never say, because they are not even capable of thinking them. That this nation loves liberty. That we detest Communism. That we will, on every possible occasion, strive to vex and humiliate Communist dictators and all others who boast themselves our enemies, to frustrate their designs, to diminish them in the eyes of their own people, to hasten their downfall by any means our laws and ethics permit. The Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky once suggested that any Western policy towards Communists should be evaluated by the following test: What does it look like to the men and women in the camps? In Castro’s camps, they are weeping |