Critics of U.S. capitalism have often cited France’s level of GDP per hour worked. As Paul Krugman wrote in 2005:
First things first: given all the bad-mouthing the French receive, you may be surprised that I describe their society as “productive.” Yet according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, productivity in France – G.D.P. per hour worked – is actually a bit higher than in the United States.
It’s true that France’s G.D.P. per person is well below that of the United States. But that’s because French workers spend more time with their families.
O.K., I’m oversimplifying a bit. There are several reasons why the French put in fewer hours of work per capita than we do. One is that some of the French would like to work, but can’t: France’s unemployment rate, which tends to run about four percentage points higher than the U.S. rate, is a real problem. Another is that many French citizens retire early. But the main story is that full-time French workers work shorter weeks and take more vacations than full-time American workers.
This is actually a pretty fair characterization, to Krugman’s credit. But it’s worth noting that as unemployment has skyrocketed in the U.S., we’ve overtaken the French in GDP per hour worked. We’re also ahead of Norway, an oil-and-gas-rich country that has a higher level of GDP per capita (PPP) than we do.
Moreover, as we’ve discussed, Krugman’s characterization of the distribution of leisure in both countries is misleading. The French spend considerable time on housework, etc., that can only be loosely described as leisure or time with their families. But that’s a separate issue.
Yes, he gets that right, but both of you should be looking at big-picture, long-term numbers, not particular one-year, one- or two-country cherry-picks.
Viz:
External Link
It's easy to write little stories about those kind of one-off numbers, but those stories have no validity.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseOh and to add:
You're absolutely right about Europeans spending their "leisure" time doing productive work -- production that is not included in GDP measurements. Ditto in the U.S.
But since the Europeans have more leisure time, they presumably do more unremunerated productive work. So if one counted that work, their GDP and GDP/capita would be somewhat higher relative to the U.S.
I did a rough calc that if you included "home work," U.S. GDP would be about a third higher than it is, and thus that home-work would constitute about 25% of U.S. GDP.
External Link
Presumably -- since they spend more time at home relative to work -- European home-work constitutes a larger percentage of their "true" GDP.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse