I recently had the pleasure of rereading Robert Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia, a book I recommend. Soon after that, I read Julian Sanchez’s stimulating interview with Nozick, which you can find here.
I’ve read many provocative and intelligent critiques of Nozick over the years. The most entertaining and engaging, to me at least, were by G.A. Cohen, a a brilliant socialist egalitarian who also wrote If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re So Rich?, an excellent, charmingly discursive critique of John Rawls’s difference principle from the left. Among liberal political philosophers, there has been a lively discussion of libertarian and classical liberal ideas in the decade since Nozick’s death. And a number of intellectual historians, like Angus Burgin of Johns Hopkins, author of the forthcoming The Return of Laissez-Faire, have really enriched our understanding of this complex, still-evolving terrain. Though I tend to gravitate towards political philosophers and political theorists informed by the classical-liberal tradition, I’ve learned a great deal from thinkers on the left who’ve engaged these questions.
Alas, I have just had the distinct displeasure of reading a critique of Nozick that is, I’m sorry to say, neither provocative nor intelligent. I wish I could get those minutes of my life back.
P.S. Hello Slate readers! There has been some regrettable confusion. What I really meant to do with this blog post was not discuss Julian Sanchez or Robert Nozick. Rather, my intention was to provide a link to the video for CD III’s “Get Tough.”
I believe it was Stephen Metcalf's essay on libertarianism now appearing on slate.com
It wasn't horrible. While it got a lot wrong, made some general points, engaged me over every page, and to the extent that it made a strawman of Nozick, argued against that strawman convincingly.
Stephen Metcalf is a cultural critic and a real no-nothing with an expansive vocabulary to mask the superficiality of his writing.
I think Tyler and Reiham are just following good web-etiquette by not directly mentioning the piece or author.
Who wrote the critique? Tyler Cowen mentions the same as you but doesn't give a link or mention the author's name.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI believe it was Stephen Metcalf's essay on libertarianism now appearing on slate.com
It wasn't horrible. While it got a lot wrong, made some general points, engaged me over every page, and to the extent that it made a strawman of Nozick, argued against that strawman convincingly.
Stephen Metcalf is a cultural critic and a real no-nothing with an expansive vocabulary to mask the superficiality of his writing.
I think Tyler and Reiham are just following good web-etiquette by not directly mentioning the piece or author.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThey may be referring to this post by Brad DeLong: External Link
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse