Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

The Agenda

NRO’s domestic-policy blog, by Reihan Salam.


Print   |  Text
 

Gov. Chris Christie: No Life is Disposable

The prestige media focused on Gov. Chris Christie’s pledge to cut New Jersey’s unusually high state income tax, yet there has been very little coverage of his decision to shift the state’s approach to nonviolent offenders:

Here is one example: we can only improve our quality of life by keeping the most violent criminals off the streets. So, I ask you to approve my bail reform package, which would mirror the federal system. It would keep offenders with a history of violence who are a danger to our communities in jail until the time of their trial, instead of releasing them into society to prey on the public.

This may require a constitutional amendment but it is reform that is long overdue. Do you know that if a person is arrested with a long record of violence we cannot detain that person in jail pending trial? We must release that person, regardless of how dangerous they are to potential witnesses against them or innocent members of our society. Let us amend our bail laws to allow judges to consider the factor of dangerousness to our communities before we release a violent person back on to the street to maim or kill while they await trial. This, too, is just simple common sense.

At the same time, let us reclaim the lives of those drug offenders who have not committed a violent crime. By investing time and money in drug treatment – in an in-house, secure facility – rather than putting them in prison.

Experience has shown that treating non-violent drug offenders is two-thirds less expensive than housing them in prison. And more importantly – as long as they have not violently victimized society – everyone deserves a second chance, because no life is disposable.

I am not satisfied to have this as merely a pilot project; I am calling for a transformation of the way we deal with drug abuse and incarceration in every corner of New Jersey.

So today I ask this Legislature and the Chief Justice to join me in this commitment that no life is disposable.

I propose mandatory treatment for every non-violent offender with a drug abuse problem in New Jersey, not just a select few. It will send a clear message to those who have fallen victim to the disease of drug abuse – we want to help you, not throw you away. We will require you to get treatment. Your life has value. Every one of God’s creations can be redeemed. Everyone deserves a second chance. [Emphasis added]

I want all politicians, and in particular all conservatives, to pay careful attention to this: Christie highlighted a dangerous gap in the system that limits the discretion of judges to keep violent offenders behind bars. Yet he also made the case that nonviolent drug offenders should be given treatment rather than imprisoned because (1) it is cost-effective, (2) it is decent and humane, and (3) it recognizes that we can’t afford to waste human potential. 

By leading with a “punitive” strategy (actually, a commonsense strategy — it’s about preserving discretion) and then pivoting to a measure that will help members of a marginalized population, Christie demonstrates his political sophistication, his strategic vision, his guts, and his decency. This is a big deal. Watch it for yourself below:

There’s another dimension to this: Christie evidently doesn’t believe that taking this stand will limit his political future. He is demonstrating that his brand of conservatism can form the foundation of a coalition that captures centrist voters even in a heavily urban, diverse northeastern state. This is part of why I understand and accept why Christie chose not to run for president this cycle: he had much more to do in New Jersey, and building a solid foundation there could be a great help if he does indeed pursue a national career.

New on The Agenda. . .


COMMENTS   1

EXPAND  

   01/19/12 16:35

Is there any rational reason that we would only limit our concern for making every life count & for rehabilitating rather than punishing & for maximizing our society's use of potential human capital to only non-violent offenders?

Is it beyond the capacity of violent offenders to change & become valuable participants in society? Surely if we lock people who have a proven history of problems controlling their violent impulses in confined spaces with other similarly troubled people we can only expect that their issues will compound & feed on each other. If we dig deep into our hearts, though, and recognize that these are real people with the potential to do great things for themselves & society, we find a way to give them a second chance & the tools to change.

There's been a lot of disturbing talk lately attributing the drop in crime over the 90's and into the present in whole or in part to the draconian incarceration rates this country has employed. But there is ample reason to think that prison had little to nothing to do with the phenomenon & we would likely have seen crime drops of at least as great a magnitude if we had employed more compassionate responses to the troubled young men mostly responsible for the sky-high murder, rape & assault statistics we faced in the mid to late 80's.

Just think of all the potential entrepreneurs who might have started the next Google, Microsoft or IBM that we have snuffed out by locking them away throughout their productive years. Not to mention the wasted taxpayer dollars on unnecessary, counterproductive imprisonment of people who are just looking for a way to put their violent past behind them.

So while I think everyone would wholeheartedly agree with you, Reihan, that Gov. Christie's move towards less incarceration & more rehabilitation of non-violent offenders is a great first step, we must also realize that it is only a first step. We won't be able to say that we've made real progress as a society until we stop locking away people just because they have exhibited a bit of trouble fitting in with societal norms about not doing drugs or attacking others or raping & killing innocents or whatever other social taboos they might have transgressed.

A truly just society would recognize & celebrate the value in all of its members, even the ones whose only contribution to the society seems to be targeting & victimizing it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact