Google+
Close

The Agenda

NRO’s domestic-policy blog, by Reihan Salam.

Keith Hennessey on the Difference Between $2.9 Trillion and $4 Trillion



Text  



Keith Hennessey explains why President Obama’s claims regarding his plan for deficit reduction merit closer scrutiny.

First, the Obama White House is using a 12-year timeframe rather than the standard 10-year timeframe for achieving $4 trillion in deficit reduction. Hennessey cites a passage from Bob Woodward explaining that Gene Sperling, director of the National Economic Council and a veteran of the Clinton White House, made the case that the public wouldn’t pay close attention to the use of a 12-year timeframe rather than a 10-year timeframe, and so the president could make his $4 trillion deficit reduction proposal sound comparable to proposals that achieve the same amount of deficit reduction over a decade, despite the fact that his proposal anticipates achieving $2.9 trillion over that period of time.   

Second, Hennessey explains that the president is including deficit reduction measures that have already been approved in his $4 trillion total.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review