Google+
Close
Fighting for Life in Texas
It’s not all Wendy Davis in the Lone Star State.

Emily Horne (left) of Texas Right to Life

Text  


A local Texas news report this week told the abysmal story of women allegedly looking for abortion options at flea markets. The purported reason? A Texas law passed this year that protects some unborn children in the latest stages of pregnancy from a brutal abortion that’s not safe for women. This has been presented as an attack on women’s rights, and Wendy Davis, now a candidate for governor, who famously filibustered against the law, as a heroine for this cause. And it’s not just women’s rights she claims the mantle of: She has recently described herself as “pro-life.” The real cause here is not women’s rights, however, but a culture of death, a culture that cries out for better options. Texas Right to Life fights for those better options. Emily Horne, a legislative assistant at Texas Right to Life, talks to NRO about the situation in Texas.

 

KATHRYN JEAN LOPEZ: What was your reaction when you heard that Wendy Davis had called herself “pro-life”? 

EMILY HORNE: Some combination of “She said what?” and “You’ve got to be kidding me” and “Did anyone let her know she got a 0 percent on our scorecard?” Frankly, her comment is surprising, because she stood for eleven hours on the Texas Senate floor defending late abortions and attacked commonsense medical standards for the abortion industry.  But she has absolutely run from the very mention of abortion since she rose to stardom by advocating for late elective abortions in her attempted filibuster.

 

Advertisement
LOPEZ: What does it mean to you to be “pro-life”? 

HORNE: To be truly pro-life, you must care about all innocent human life from the moment of conception until natural death. This includes not only help for women facing an abortion decision, but also help for those in hospitals who are being denied life-saving treatment, or those in the disability community being told that their lives have no worth or value. As the cultural regard for life diminishes, our job as pro-lifers becomes more all-encompassing and more urgent. 

 

LOPEZ: How did you get into this work? What has been the most important lesson you have learned from it? 

HORNE: I’ve been interested in this cause from a young age. I’m the fourth in a family of nine children; my parents led by example and taught us respect and regard for all life. The most important lesson I’ve learned through working in this cause has been the constant need for compassion in this movement. The pro-life movement is one of love, and true change cannot be accomplished without it. The mothers facing an abortion decision aren’t there because they want to be, and you never know how much impact you may have with a kind word or listening ear. 

 

LOPEZ: Did Davis do a little service, though? “Pro-life” has become too associated with political sides to be a worthwhile term in shedding light on what’s going on in America today under the guise of women’s health and freedom (or privacy, as Roe had it)?

HORNE: I think the fact that she tries to claim the term “pro-life” and the fact that the other side hates to use it to describe us, instead using the term “anti-abortion,” proves what an impact language can have on this debate. They hate conceding the term “pro-life” because one can hardly want to be termed “anti-life.” Notice they also refuse the flipside of their own terminology of “anti-abortion,” and cry foul when they are called “pro-abortion.” Even Senator Davis tried to deny that she had been advocating for abortion in her remarks yesterday, and this proves that even those advocating for the procedure are hardly comfortable with it. And that speaks volumes for our cause. 

 

LOPEZ: What’s your counter to the claim that Davis is “pro-life”? 

HORNE: Abortion, and fighting for the right to kill the unborn, is what made Senator Davis famous. It’s ironic she’s shying away from the image of an abortion supporter now, but she has an abysmal voting record that clearly indicates her positions. She’s always received zeroes on Texas Right to Life’s scorecards for voting against protections not only for the unborn but also the ill and elderly in Texas hospitals. She voted for Senate Bill 303 in the 2013 regular session, to expand the ability of doctors to remove life-sustaining treatment from a patient against his or her wishes. The bill Senator Davis filibustered this summer protected babies from abortion at the point at which they could feel pain — and still she did not prove to be “pro-life,” not even halfway through the pregnancy. It’s truly sad that those whose lives she chooses to ignore are the very ones who have no voice, and no defense. 



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

NRO Polls on LockerDome

Subscribe to National Review