Camille & Co.

Author Camille Paglia


A few readers named Thomas L. Friedman. One said, “I seldom agree with him, but he writes with some intelligence and little toxicity.” I’m glad to hear it. When I read him, years ago, there was too much toxicity for me.

Several readers named Susan Estrich — I agree. Worth reading, worth listening to, about politics (and policy, I suppose).

Still others said Lanny Davis, and Juan Williams, and Kirsten Powers. Of the third of these, one or two readers said, “She’ll be conservative in a few years. She’s a conservative-in-waiting, a conservative-in-progress.”

So that may be “cheating” too, for our present purposes.

Says a reader, “I look at CNN and listen to NPR to see what the liberal who believes he is getting political variety is being fed. I read The Nation to see what the current liberal red meat is, and also because Katrina vanden Heuvel is gorgeous.”

Hear, hear. Ten or fifteen years ago, I encountered her in a green room. I said, “Ah, the world’s most beautiful leftist.”

A reader cites Leonard Pitts, of the Miami Herald. Another reader cites Eric Zorn, of the Chicago Tribune: “Rarely if ever does he play the race card . . . He also seems to be genuinely interested in dialogue with the opposite side, and appears to understand the conservative arguments he rejects (or sometimes accepts with caveats).”

A nice commendation.

Another reader says, “Max Brantley at the Arkansas Times. Followed him throughout the ’90s when I lived there. He is left of center but pretty honest.” (Liberals will love that “but”!)

A reader describes Ruth Gavison as “a serious but leftist jurist.” (“Leftist but serious”?) Another reader says, “Rick Salutin is a thoughtful lefty.” He adds, “As a former lefty myself, I agree with you that most writers on the left are whiny feminists, hysterical environmentalists, or race-baiting charlatans.”

Did I say that? I guess it sounds like me. Anyway, continuing:

“I know of only one left-winger, in any kind of media, who behaves honorably,” says a reader. Who, pray tell? “Dr. Paul Shackley, who calls himself a ‘Zen Marxist.’”

A friend of mine writes, “I live in terror of inhabiting a political cocoon — as my parents, teachers, and classmates’ parents did (on the left).” When it comes to racial matters, “Orlando Patterson is a decent sort and always worth reading, despite his left politics.”

Several readers said they looked at RealClearPolitics, for a range of writers and views.

Quite a few readers cited National Public Radio. “But,” says one of them, “I can’t call NPR honorable because it tries to conceal its liberal bias behind a pretense of objectivity.” Another reader has a different view: “Every morning I listen to NPR. In general they seem to represent the intellectual wing of liberalism. Generally not shrill, clearly slanted, but not intentionally so, more like reflexively so.”

I loved that: “not intentionally but reflexively.”

Says a reader,

My favorite liberal writers work for The New Republic, and I usually read them only on certain topics . . . Jonathan Cohn on health care, Alec MacGillis on politics or the horse race, and Julia Ioffe on Russia. Noam Scheiber is an exception to the one-subject rule — I’ll read anything he writes, as he is a good reporter and usually fair minded.

Outside TNR, John Cassidy of The New Yorker gives a good liberal take on all things financial.

Good to know. And I smiled broadly at these sentences, from a different reader: “I skim the New York Times for self-parodying liberalism. The Washington Post is liberalism that gets the joke.”

Not just clever, I think, but true.

That’s about it. Thank you for playing, everybody. Talk to you soon. (I’m headed just now back to the ghetto.) (Haven’t left it, really.)


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

NRO Polls on LockerDome

Subscribe to National Review