Google+
Close
No, the Benghazi Questions Aren’t All Answered
Why the House continues to investigate.

The Benghazi compound, September 11, 2012

Text  


Comments
395
Jim Geraghty

NBC News’s Chuck Todd, speaking on MSNBC Tuesday morning, contended that the newly formed House select committee investigating Benghazi was likely to rehash familiar arguments and miss broader issues worth discussing:

It certainly looks more partisan than it looks like a serious inquiry. They’ve done a ton of these inquiries already, the House has. There’s been a Senate Intelligence investigation. Forget just the State Department. I think you could argue that yes, Congress should have done what it did, which is go through some of these committees. But as for the need for the select committee — you know, I’ll hear from Republicans that say, ‘But there are unanswered questions!’ Well, no, all the questions have been answered. There’s just some people that don’t like the answers, that wish the answers were somehow more conspiratorial, I guess.

Their focus seems to be off. Have a conversation about the policy. Have a debate, an investigation into whether the policy is working; to whether the response to the Arab Spring, whether we did the right thing with the light footprint in Libya. But to sit here and investigate talking points seems to be totally missing the larger point here. It’s like investigating who cut down one tree in a forest that’s been burned down.”

Advertisement
Todd is half-right that there are broader issues worth examining. But there is good reason for Republicans to believe that full answers have been withheld, and Americans have seen little or no real accountability for a largely preventable outrage.

As Todd notes, several House and Senate committees launched their own inquiries, but the White House withheld certain documents and evidence, which raises serious doubts about how thoroughly and accurately those committees’ questions have been answered. For example, the White House never sent Congress an e-mail from Ben Rhodes instructing then–ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice to “underscore these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy,” infuriating lawmakers.

White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters the White House didn’t include the e-mail in its disclosures to Capitol Hill because it wasn’t about Benghazi, but ABC News’s Jonathan Karl noted that the e-mail in question has an entire section labeled “Benghazi.” How many other documents have been withheld because the administration judged them not relevant, were momentarily struck with inexplicable illiteracy, or simply deemed them too damaging or embarrassing to turn over to Congress?

Earlier, senators had complained about heavily redacted documents:

“It was so redacted that there was no information whatsoever,” said the source, who spoke to Fox on the condition they not be identified. “There were some documents that were 100 pages with every word on the page redacted. They were worthless.”

More than a year after the attack, Senator Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) was informed that he could not interview the survivors of the attack because it would somehow interfere with the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators. This decision came as surprising news to FBI director James Comey, whose agency is responsible for that prosecution. Comey said he had no objection to the interviews. After Graham finally did speak with the survivors, he said some told him “they’ve been told to be quiet.”

While it’s entirely possible that Graham is misinterpreting or mischaracterizing the survivors’ comments, it’s impossible to know as long as the survivors’ comments and testimony remain hidden from the public. When the public has gotten to hear from those close to the events on the ground, such as Gregory Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission in Libya who was in Tripoli at the time of the attack, the testimony has offered a gripping, eye-opening, and disturbing portrait of the U.S. government being caught flat-footed and unable to mobilize in a crisis.

This is a particularly cynical strategy by the administration: They take as long as possible to provide the information and then complain that Congress remains obsessed with long-ago issues. Former National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor exemplified the delay-then-demand-others-move-on approach when he recently told Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier, “Dude, this was like two years ago.”

Finally, Carney recently suggested the White House may not cooperate with this new House panel because the Obama administration had not yet decided whether it deemed it a “legitimate” investigation.


Meme Watch: Benghazi
The release of administration e-mails concerning the Benghazi scandal has reignited the debate over White House spin and deceit over the attacks and the blame game that followed. Here’s a look at some recent graphics making the rounds on social media. (Image via Twitter @jennybaggy)
"@DianeSawyer barely mentions #Benghazi but she covers dog yawning as World News! I believe the yawn broke her brain!" (Via Twitter @kaylc1)
"Americans deserve the truth on #Benghazi and it's clear Democrats refuse to give it to them." (Via Twitter @NRSC)
"With the email we know #Benghazi was a coverup of Obama and Clinton a stain on our govt" (Via Twitter @davidjones720)
Be afraid. Be very afraid. (Image via Twitter @TPO_Hisself)
Criminal complaint? (Image via Facebook/PatriotsLiveFree)
So long ago... (Image via Facebook/RightWingRantsRaves)
Most transparent administation ever. (Image via Facebook/BreitbartOneSilencedMillionsAwakened)
Trey Gowdy to the rescue! (Image via Facebook/BreitbartOneSilencedMillionsAwakened)
Well, at least he wasn't out playing golf. (Image via Facebook/BreitbartOneSilencedMillionsAwakened)
Don't harsh their mellow with a select committee. (Image via Facebook/BreitbartOneSilencedMillionsAwakened)
The media-industrial complex. (Image: Heritage.org)
Who yo gonna believe? Jay or your lyin' eyes? (Image: ThePeoplesCube.com)
"Carney (@pressec) Lies, Claims #Benghazi Document 'Not About Benghazi'" (Via Twitter @BossHoggUSMC)
"#Benghazi COVERUP LINKED DIRECTLY TO WHITE HOUSE" (Via Twitter @USABillOfRights)
Because they couldn't figure out a way to make Benghazi about race. (Image via Facebook/PatriotsLiveFree)
The least interesting man in the world. (Image via Facebook/PoliticalCorrectnessMustDie)
"It's time to end Obama's Cover Up on #Benghazi" (Via Twitter @peddoc63)
Spin control. (Image via Facebook/NoLapDogMedia)
Cue the select committee. (Image via Facebook/PoliticalCorrectnessMustDie)
The're all together ooky... (Image: IOwntheWorld.com)
44 & 45? (Image via Facebook/Conservative-Lady)
Mind the news cycle, please! (Image via Facebook/BreitbartOneSilencedMillionsAwakened)
He reports, you decide. (Image via Facebook/Conservative-Lady)
Does she have diplomatic immunity? (Image: CapitalismInstitute.org)
Inevtiable front-runner? (Image via Facebook/Newsbusters)
Game of Thrones? (Image via Facebook/NoLapDogMedia)
Why the cover-up? (Image via Facebook/NY18DistrictForum)
Trey Gowdy is on the case! (Image via Facebook/PatriotsLiveFree)
(Image via Facebook/PatriotPost)
"#Busted! Boom: New #Benghazi Emails Show WH Coordinated False Talking Points" (Via Twitter @LessGovMoreFun)
"New #Benghazi Emails Show White House Effort to Protect #Obama" (Via Twitter @USABillOfRights)
"Cliven Bundy would've named ranch #Benghazi #Bendfeds wouldn't have showed up" (Via Twitter @Anna_Spicer2013)
"We. Will. Never. Forget. #Benghazi" (Via Twitter @ROCKInTheUSSA)
Updated: May. 05, 2014

ADVERTISEMENT


Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

NRO Polls on LockerDome

Subscribe to National Review