Google+
Close
The Hill’s Hide-and-Seek Hypocrites
The DISCLOSE Act is just another example of the Democratic majority's endless hide-and-seek hypocrisy.


Text  


Michelle Malkin

You know when a politician starts a sentence with “frankly,” he’s about to lie to your face. The same principle applies to campaign-finance legislation dubbed the “DISCLOSE Act.” The voter’s instinctive reaction should be: What are they trying to hide now? Drafted out of public view with left-wing lobbyists and rammed through Congress after bypassing committee hearings, this bum bill would have been better named the CLOSED DOOR Act.

Advertisement
At a Rose Garden press conference on Monday, President Obama decried the influence of “shadow groups” on elections and urged the Senate to pass the “reform” sponsored by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.). But the loophole-ridden package exempts large nonprofits with 500,000 or more members. Behemoth labor unions get preferential treatment. Bradley Smith, former Federal Elections Commission chairman, noted that the law places radical speech-squelching restrictions on companies’ ability to run independent political ads: “[I]f you’re a company with a government contract of over $10 million [like more than half of the top 50 U.S. companies] or if you’re a company with more than 20 percent foreign shareholders, you can’t even mention a candidate in an ad for up to a full year before the election. . . . There are no similar prohibitions for unions representing government contractors or unions with foreign membership.”

GOP senator Mitch McConnell put it more starkly during Tuesday’s debate before the Senate cloture vote on the bill: The DISCLOSE Act, he said, is a “transparent attempt to rig the fall elections.” At bottom, McConnell diagnosed correctly, this is a jobs-protection bill for entrenched incumbents more interested in protecting their hides than protecting the Constitution. While the cloture vote fell three votes short of the needed 60 on Tuesday, Schumer vowed to resurrect the issue “again and again and again until we pass it.”

In attacking Republicans who oppose this campaign-finance Kabuki, Obama audaciously feigned alarm over the proliferation of fake grassroots groups with innocuous-sounding names. Special interests, he complained, “can hide behind a name like ‘Citizens for a Better Future,’ even if a more accurate name would be ‘Companies for Weaker Oversight.’” Let me supply some more examples that won’t appear on Obama’s teleprompter anytime soon:

How about “Consumers Organized for Reliable Electricity”? That’s the front group White House senior adviser David Axelrod formed to shill for a massive utility-tax hike championed by Commonwealth Edison in Chicago.

Or how about “Americans for Stable Quality Care”? That was the government health-care-takeover-promoting, special-interest coalition funded by Big Pharma, the AARP, AMA, and the Service Employees International Union. The group pitched in $150 million for pro-Obama health care ads to create the illusion of grassroots support.

Or how about “Health Care for America Now”? That’s the 1825 K Street–based “grassroots” lobbying conglomerate funded by radical-liberal sugar-daddy George Soros and the brass-knuckled, purple-shirted bosses of the SEIU.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

NRO Polls on LockerDome

Subscribe to National Review