Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

May 28 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Assange the Anti-American
President Obama insisted that America’s adversaries hated his predecessor, not this country. Julian Assange begs to differ.

By Rich Lowry


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

If electing a black president with the middle name Hussein was supposed to assuage anti-Americanism around the world, Julian Assange didn’t get the message.

The first batch of WikiLeaks documents undermined the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, violent conflicts started by the hated, warmongering Bush administration. The latest batch undermines American diplomacy, the soft art of international bargaining and persuasion as practiced by the highly anticipated, engagement-loving Obama administration.

Advertisement

Assange is an equal-opportunity America hater. It doesn’t matter if our president is black or white, left or right, with the middle name Hussein or Walker, so long as he’s leader of the country Assange perversely calls a threat to democracy, even as he provides aid and comfort to our violent, undemocratic enemies overseas.

The classic justification for a leak is to expose malfeasance. In all his tens of thousands of released documents, Assange has exposed none, despite his typically delusional boast that the first dump revealed “thousands” of possible war crimes. Assange’s goal is wanton destruction, pure and simple.

He wants to expose to retribution those who cooperate with us on the ground in war zones. He wants to undercut domestic support for our wars. He wants to embarrass our foreign allies and exact a price for their trust in us. He wants to complicate sensitive operations like securing nuclear material in Pakistan and attacking terrorists with missiles in Yemen.

Assange is Noam Chomsky with a knack for computers and a determination to do the “American empire” more harm than just lashing out against it in feverish books gobbled up by college sophomores.

Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, proposes designating WikiLeaks a terrorist organization. That won’t happen. In his left-wing nihilism, though, Assange shares something of the spirit of the Red Brigades or the Baader-Meinhof Gang, the leftist European terrorist organizations of the 1970s. His propaganda of the deed is malicious exposure.

Assange is too blinded by zeal to realize that the content of his documents runs counter to his twisted worldview. As Tom Joscelyn of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies notes, his leaked Afghan war materials referred to numerous instances of decapitations perpetrated by the Taliban. The documents told the story of a civilized army struggling to prevail against barbarism while honoring its own norms.

Our leaked diplomatic cables again do more to vindicate a hawk’s view of the world than Assange’s juvenile leftism. The Gulf Arab states are as eager as Israel, perhaps more so, for the United States to strike Iran’s nuclear program. North Korea is transferring missile technology to Iran, in a concrete expression of the Axis of Evil. Syria is arming Hezbollah. And on it goes.

One hopes that the Obama administration has learned a little something about the difference between governing and spouting comforting bromides. In keeping with his pledge to talk to our enemies, Barack Obama fruitlessly reached out to Tehran — and alarmed our allies. The most pathetic episode in the documents is the administration begging such countries as Slovenia and Kiribati to take prisoners from Gitmo, in its desperation to fulfill its foolish promise to shutter the facility rapidly.

Confronting a dangerous world is difficult enough without the brazen exposure of the nation’s secrets. The Obama administration must hold accountable whoever established the woeful security procedures that allowed Bradley Manning, an Army private in Iraq and the alleged source of the documents, to capture massive amounts of sensitive data with the ease of an iTunes download. Manning should face the sternest possible charges, with the severest possible punishment. Assange himself exists as the cyber equivalent of a pirate, an Australian floating between European countries and operating with impunity. Surely, the same Justice Department that sued Arizona for daring to enforce the nation’s immigration laws can find a creative way to harry and shut down Assange.

Barack Obama came into office hawking the illusion that America’s adversaries hated his predecessor, not this country. Julian Assange begs to differ.

— Rich Lowry is editor of National Review. He can be reached via e-mail, comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. © 2010 by King Features Syndicate.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST

Lowry: Unleash Biden!

Charen: Obama’s Education Hypocrisy -- Again



COMMENTS   22

EXPAND  

   11/30/10 09:15

Maybe he's just an anarchist; making the US, with its role as status quo stabilizer, the prime target.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Joe Pars
   11/30/10 09:45

This guy should "disappear"!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 11:25

Chomsky differs from WikiTwerp in one significant way: Chomsky believes the US, though deeply flawed, is better than all others. His claimed objective is to improve by illuminating.

WikiTwerp is 50% egomaniac and 50% anti-American. The egomania doesn't allow WikiTwerp to imagine a world where a klepto-state Russia or totalitarian China act with impunity and the sad consequences of such a world.

I tend to agree with highlama that WikiTwerp is probably an anarchist. Which is even more ironic as he and his ilk would be the first that "disappear" in a society governed by brute force and aggression.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 11:50

Not only should this guy disappear, but PFC Manning, Wiki's source, needs to never again see the light of day.

A noose would be more fitting for Manning, but life in a federal prison would give him ample time to think about being a traitor.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 12:49

"Surely, the same Justice Department that sued Arizona for daring to enforce the nation’s immigration laws CAN FIND A CREATIVE WAY to harry and shut down Assange."

The above quote is further confirmation of National Review's principled legal conservatism and its longstanding belief in the strict interpretation of legal statutes.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 12:50

"Surely, the same Justice Department that sued Arizona for daring to enforce the nation’s immigration laws CAN FIND A CREATIVE WAY to harry and shut down Assange."

The above quote is further confirmation of National Review's principled legal conservatism and its longstanding belief in the strict interpretation of legal statutes.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 13:04

"Rep. Peter King, a Republican from New York, proposes designating WikiLeaks a terrorist organization. That won’t happen."

But it's still a defensible response, and a good idea. It would crank up the heat on anyone in the State Department or DoD who might consider assisting Assange in his criminal enterprise.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 14:13

How is this any different from the Obama Administration releasing classified CIA Documents on Terrorist Interrogations???

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Captain Oh
   11/30/10 14:28

This guy Ass-ange has the perfect look of a James Bond movie super villain. If the US had any spine at all, Ass-ange would have to hide from place to place and spend all his ill gotten money to fend for himself.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 14:34

It is very hard to penetrate a leftist world view with fact. Most leftist will simply think that if Obama had really done what he should have done, make peace at any price with Iran, released all detainees from Gitmo into America with huge cash settlements and withdrawn immediately from Afghanistan and Iraq then the world would have been smitten with us. Assange would love us! The whole world would be at peace! So deep has the left fallen into their dream world...or "reality" based views...sad really. One day perhaps even the left will realize that we have enemies just because of who we are.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
phil1234
   11/30/10 14:54

Has it ever crossed anyone's mind around here why our "democratic" government keeps so many prosaic and trivial documents classified? Is there not something Big Brotherish about huge bureaucracies only letting us know what they want us to know and hardly letting us know anything?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 15:32

@phil1234, who wrote:

"Has it ever crossed anyone's mind around here why our "democratic" government keeps so many prosaic and trivial documents classified?"

In the United States, open records laws at every level of government give citizens incomparable access to records and documents. Our country has led the world in exposing the inner workings of government to publich scrutiny. Even now, few governments can compare; so the sneer quotes around the word "democratic" are not called for.

If you are expressing frustration at having to cull through the ocean of trivial classified Wikileaks documents to find anything of substance; well, perhaps classifying everything "secret" is not a flaw, it's a feature!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   11/30/10 16:58

Just saw something on Drudge that says that Amazon servers were used by Wikileaks during the denial-of-service attack. Boycott Amazon?

External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
John Wilkes
   11/30/10 17:10

Perhaps if we pulled our military out of the 100+ countries our illustrious leaders use it to occupy (or as President Washington warned, avoid "entangling alliances"), put them on our Southern border until we could finish the fence, restored sound money, developed our domestic oil supply, built more nuclear power plants and eliminated the income tax our prosperity would return and we would once again be that shining city on the hill. However, as long as we camp out in the neighbors' yards with guns and bombs, be assured, they will hate us. If we would return to the limited government and non-interventionist foreign policy the founders intended, there wouldn't be any dirty laundry for the Assanges of the world to air out. Think about it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
phil1234
   11/30/10 18:18

GruffBear,

That the workings of our federal bureaucracy have been increasingly shrouded from public view by a culture of secrecy in the post-war era is a fact. Pat Moynihan wrote a very good book about it that I recommend you read. How other countries laws on the matter compare to ours is irrelevant to how ours measure up to the principles of liberal democracy.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
MarioSmario
   12/01/10 10:04

I agree with the article. The anti-American european left lost it's rationality generations ago. I'm not sure what will come of it. But has anyone ever heard of a something called "self-fulfilling prophesy"? Assange and his aristocratic ilk should consider just who has the bombs when trying to trash a rather benign superpower.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Scott Locklin
   12/01/10 16:08

You know, I keep hearing he's "anti-American." In fact, a google search on his name and that phrase led me here. I don't buy it. While he has certainly done harm to our colonial efforts abroad, it is possible to be opposed to this sort of thing and not be "anti-American." Unless you think "America" is the war.
I also wonder why NR doesn't point out that Bradley Manning published them things because he was gay (and possibly transsexual) and peeved at the "Don't ask don't tell" policies of the military. Sounds like news to me.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/01/10 16:28

Assange must have damaged his pre-frontal cortex, because he clearly has no self-regulation. Either that, or he's an idiot savant. Bill Maher's younger brother? George Soros' protege?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
paul dillon
   12/02/10 15:17

Phil1234,
You seem to think like a juvenile and naive child. We 'camp out' in Korea with the full permission and favour of the South Korean government for very good and noble reasons. We classify documents in order to keep our thoughts internal. Maybe you have never left a thought unspoken, but most people do for good reason. It is only wise and prudent for a government to think and deliberate before communicating externally - the same wisdom applies to individuals. Perhaps you should try it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mark Smith
   12/09/10 11:57

What hope is there for the human race with the fear, hatred and short sightedness that forms the prevailing attitude in the above article and comments? Why on Earth you would want to shut down an organisation that informs the World population on the wrong doing of ALL governments is beyond me. Be careful what you wish for folks.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact