The era of Michael Steele’s chairmanship of the Republican National Committee appears to be nearing its end.
At least some of the men and women who aspire to Steele’s job will meet Wednesday for a debate before conservative activists and some RNC members sponsored by FreedomWorks and the Conservative Steering Committee, a group of RNC members who are worried about ideological drift in the national party organization. At least one more debate will be held in January, sponsored by Americans for Tax Reform.
Advertisement
The first oddity in the crowded field is how many former allies of the current RNC chairman are running or considering a bid. Saul Anuzis, the former Michigan GOP chair who assisted Steele on technology issues earlier in the cycle, has announced a bid. Gentry Collins, a veteran strategist who worked alongside Steele for two years — and who, when announcing his sudden resignation, expressed frustration with Steele — is reportedly considering his own bid for the chairmanship. So is Wisconsin party chairman Reince Priebus, who ran Steele’s 2009 bid for chairman.
“I don’t take lightly the fact that I am challenging a friend and colleague for the chairmanship,” Anuzis said in his announcement. “When Michael was elected chairman, I was the only candidate who stepped forward to attend the next morning’s RNC breakfast meeting, agreed to join the transition team, and later took on several roles as a team player on the RNC . . . and I have attended every meeting since. Given my involvement and efforts to help over the past two years, it was not an easy decision for me to seek the post. As someone who believes in loyalty, my natural instinct would be to sit this out. But the simple fact is that the overriding challenge we face is winning back the presidency in 2012, and we will not accomplish that objective unless there is dramatic change in the way the RNC does business.”
“I’ve publicly called for Steele to resign because of his remarks about Afghanistan,” says Cesar Conda, a former assistant for domestic policy to Vice President Dick Cheney and a well-connected GOP strategist. “I’m a big supporter of Saul Anuzis for RNC chairman. Saul is clearly recognized as the most tech-savvy party leader on the GOP side. He understands the new media better than anyone and can make revolutionary changes in the RNC’s technology and communications efforts. Saul is a prodigious fundraiser, and there is no substitute for a personalized approach to high-dollar fundraising — especially when we don’t have the White House. Saul is willing to commit the energy to these programs that is required, given the failure of Steele to keep them on track.”
Conda adds that he likes the fact that Anuzis “is not politically ambitious. He has no plans to ever run for public office. He isn’t going to write a book. He is a pro who will make the trains run on time and stay out of the way of the candidates and elected GOP leaders when it comes to securing media and being the face of the party.”
Ann Wagner, who was chair of the Missouri GOP from 1999 to 2005, has also announced a bid. She served as co-chair of the GOP from 2001 to 2005, and most recently chaired the winning Senate bid of Roy Blunt in her home state. In her announcement, she emphasized the financial operations of the organization: “The RNC needs to be funded to its maximum obligations. We must be efficient, relevant, professional and credible. We must start immediately to erase past debt and restore the confidence of our donor base. . . . Fundraising must come first. We also must have greater transparency and accountability when it comes to the RNC’s budget and expenditures. As a former co-chairman and member, I know how important it is for the RNC membership to be fully informed and engaged.”
In Agreement with Kevin Williamson - it should go to Sarah Palin and the position needs to be elevated to a higher control inside the Republican Party. All these others mentioned are lightweights - we need a MAJOR heavyweight FOR ALL LEVELS of elected office. This position is ALL about getting out the vote AND rallying the troops to a uber-level of enthusiasm - Hence SARAH PALIN! Nobody else in The Republican Party comes close to Palin in accomplishing these 2 tasks.
Steele was a worthy gamble but it didn't pay off. I don't think the job is so hard a good hard working person with the right connections and experience can really pull it off. However with the possibility of the Senate and the Presidency flipping Republican organizing the ground game and funding that organization is EVERYTHING in 2012. Nothing must come before that. If the chairman can fund and organize the ground game in all 50 states then they are a major hero. If they can't and we don't win in all in 2012 then I am with Derb we are all doomed.
I do not believe the GOB-GOP elites want Sarah Palin anywhere near the RNC! Furthermore, I do not think SP wants the job. She is much more productive as a 'free', roaming spirit campaigning for T.E.A. party candidates who are vetted and selected for city councilman to the governor of the states.
I think the Internet savvy Anuzis is the candidate I can support. However, most all of them are qualified and they would be a plus for the RNC and allow Anuzis to make the decisions and delegate duties and responsibilities for them to cover certain regions of the country.
They need a dynamic, forward-looking individual committed to core principles of American exceptionalism and limited government who will not insist the roar the American people gave out in 2010 was really a vote of confidence in Republicans qua Republicans.
They also need a person acceptable to the Republican establishment that was so happy with the Kennebunkport Kulturney, the Romney Ravagers, the McCain Conundrums, and the Huckabee Hucksters.