As he stepped into a Capitol elevator late Thursday, bundled up in preparation for the winter winds, Sen. Mitch McConnell cracked a thin smile. For the low-key leader of Senate Republicans, good spirits were certainly in order. Minutes before, his cross-aisle counterpart, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, had sounded a death knell for the much-maligned $1.1 trillion omnibus spending package — the pork-packed keystone of the Democratic lame-duck agenda.
McConnell, in an interview with National Review Online, called it a “victory for the country.” It was also a victory for his caucus, which has battled all month to maintain a united front. Indeed, to halt Reid’s spending spree, McConnell had to spend the week tethered to the phone, twisting the arms of Republican appropriators.
Advertisement
Retiring GOP senators like Kit Bond (Mo.), George Voinovich (Ohio), and Robert Bennett (Utah) were considered by numerous Senate aides to be, at varying points, susceptible to Reid’s machinations. Other Republicans rumored to be mulling a “yea” vote on the omnibus included Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Sen. Thad Cochran (Miss.), who alone requested more than $500 million worth of earmarks in the bill.
McConnell’s challenge was to softly cajole pork-friendly Republicans, many of whom hold senior status in the upper chamber, to abandon their home-state projects. At one point in the deliberations, Reid mentioned nine Republicans (though not by name) who had signaled their support. Senior GOP aides dispute that number, but either way, the bill appears to have come dangerously close to passing. It took McConnell’s flurry of phone calls, the zealous efforts of Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.), and threats from Sens. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) and Jim DeMint (R., S.C.) to force a reading of the bill to ultimately crash the omnibus.
With his vote-count dwindling, a “sorry and disappointed” Reid took to the Senate floor to announce that he would pull his spending bill, caving to McConnell’s push to pass a simple, one-page resolution to continue government funding over the holiday recess. For full effect, in a move reminiscent of the health-care debates earlier this year, Republicans had hauled the entire 1,924-page cinder block of a bill onto the Senate floor. They’d come prepared for a showdown.
“I’m proud of our team for holding together,” McConnell said. “I’m proud of the appropriations-committee members who decided that this is not the way to do it.” Instead of following Reid’s demands, “we decided that we’re not going to pass a 2,000-page bill that nobody has seen since yesterday. That’s not the way to operate and that’s not the message from the November elections. We decided not to do it. Unified Republican opposition is what got it done.”
Democrats had mixed feelings about how Reid handled the omnibus at the eleventh hour. In an interview outside the Senate chamber, NRO asked Sen. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa) about whether he thinks Reid caved. “How about that caving,” Harkin said, as he turned to an aide. “I told you — that’s the way it’s going to be printed. That’s the way it’s going to be written.”
“I felt that we should have brought it up and made them vote on it,” Harkin said. “We have things in there on defense, homeland security, education, health, energy, and infrastructure that won’t be in the [continuing resolution]. At least I’d make them vote on it. Now they can say, ‘Well, I didn’t vote for it.’ We never had a vote. I’m very disappointed. We should have had a vote on it.”
But the numbers, it seems, never came together for Reid, who had to fight a public-relations battle for the bill as he counted noses. The rhetoric between camps was heated. McCain, who spent the week railing against the omnibus, was beside himself. He had called the bill a “monstrosity” and “the most outrageous repudiation of the voter I’ve seen since I’ve been in the United States Senate,” and warned Republican colleagues who would dare support it.
On Thursday, after Reid’s announcement, McCain took to the floor to call the bill’s defeat a “seminal moment” in Senate history. “For the first time since I’ve been here, we stood up and said ‘enough,’” he said. He lamented, half-jokingly, that he would never again have the opportunity to chastise pork-addicted colleagues.
I think we can live with Sen. Mark Kirk's "rookie mistake" given that this time last year we were forced to witness the brazenly proud celebration of the vain and indulgent Nancy Pelosi after having rammed the Obamacare bill down the throats of the unwilling American citizenry.
After all, this time our public servants were exercising restraint instead of indulgence and when we are trillions of dollars in the hole, restraint is the only sane response.
Mercy, no more of this no labels nonsense, please.
I am glad this one failed. And I wish in January we could see more stand alone bills and less of these 2000 page monstrosities.
From what I understand the earmarks that the dems brag were in there from Republicans were from a while ago and packed into this in an effort to embarrass our side.
Any rep who would vote for this is an enemy of our country. How I wish that Alaska didn't write in for Murkowski. How I wish that she could lose in that election.
Now we must fight the Dream Act. This lame duck session must see no wins, must get to pass no more legislation.
I don't believe Harry Reid really had his heart in this bill. Every sane individual in this country understands debt and budgeting. Every politician needs to rethink their role in the governing process. Let the states keep their money at home and compete with other states. The Federal Government's role should be redefined. Defense, securing the borders, transportation and the other obvious duties that only a national force can provide. Get out of energy, education, housing, and yes....ear marks.
Kirk didn't say anything that many Americans didn't think when they heard this bill was pulled. I have to agree with DianeinWA. After watching the disgusting display of ego, hubris and in-your-face laughter, Pelosi and her band of merry travelers held after shoving ObamaCare down our throats, it is more than a bit hypocritical for the Dems to complain about any celebratory language coming from any Republican. Pelosi marching through Americans who in the millions protested ObamaCare, carrying her over-sized gavel, will go down in history as a moment when the Dems began their road to self-destruction. "Did we just win?" asked by a freshman Senator won't even be an afterthought.
Now, if we can only get the GOP to hold strong against the rest of Reid's lame-duck on steroids plans - America will really win.
So let's review:
The Republicans ask "Did we just win?" and that's overboard.
The Democrats say the GOP is holding the American people 'hostage' over and over and that's ok.
So calling GOP kidnappers is ok.
GOP acknowledging facts is not ok.
Fantasy and lies: OK.
Truth: not OK.
The reason we have an 'omnibus" bill is so that our representatives can hide most of the objectionable spending along with the necessary spending. It also allows them to have so huge of a bill that no one can possibly scrutinize the details. Its also more convenient to have one bill with thousands of earmarks and just take the criticism one time than if they produced smaller allocation bills multiple times.
I would hope that the republican majority in the house next year will break the appropriations into bite sized pieces so that the process will be more transparent and controllable. Maybe we can get the tea partiers to insist on that approach.
Claire McCaskill is the real hypocrite. The so-called GOP earmarks are from February, when the omnibus bill drafting process first commenced, well before GOP senators swore off earmarks. And as TamiB said above, the disgusting display of Democrats flaunting their cram down of ObamaCare upon an unwilling public forever bars them, in my opinion, from making criticisms of GOP reactions to small victories like this one.
One success I see is that the Republicans not only won, they are also getting a continuing resolution, so no "Gin-grinch-ian" government "shut down," so no real down-side. Victory with no pain! When was the last time they won on a trillion dollar issue? Which means it might be a little easier to round up the troops next time, and if they establish a habit of winning... well, let's not get carried away.
Asking if we won is fine, when what we defeated was another last-minute nobody-can-read-this bill, which really did repudiate what the voters had done barely a month earlier.
The shame is that the Reid/Pelosi tactics are so common that having a bill read aloud is unthinkable, while passing unread bills in the dead of night is just fine.
When those voting on a bill are not permitted to seriously review it, there is no democracy, merely a show.
I hope we'll get a few thumbs up for Sen. McCain after this one. I have been getting a little fed up with some of the criticisms of him, both before and after the 2008 presidential campaign.
Is anyone else tired of the "this billion is only a small amount of the entire bill" besides me? What is that old saying - a billion here, a billion there and pretty soon you are talking real money.
There would have been no better Christmas present than a government shutdown. The idea that we can't live without a fully funded bloated bureaucracy for even a few days would be funny if it wasn't so sad. The whole govt shutdown talk is a joke; they could always fund noncritical parts (you know the parts included in the constitution) and shut down say The National Portrait Gallery and the Dept of Ed. But no we have to raise the spector of wicked Newt and the cold hearted politicians who want granny to starve through winter. Like I said funny were not it sad.
Annual budget bill for the following fiscal year: typically written in the spring, debated in the summer, and passed before the start of the fiscal year (October).
This time, nothing introduced until mid-December, then its over 1900 pages.