Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

May 28 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
From Yale to the NFL
Are we still the home of the brave?

By Dennis Prager


Archive Latest RSS Send
Text  

Last week, the National Football League called off a game because it was going to snow in Philadelphia. This has not happened before. American football is played under all weather conditions. That is part of its appeal. Snow, rain, freezing temperatures — nothing stops an NFL game.

But last Sunday, the NFL and Philadelphia city officials called off the Eagles–Vikings game because of an imminent snowstorm — in order to protect fans from having to drive at that time.

Gov. Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania, a Democrat, wrote a scathing column for the Washington Times indicting those who called off the game. He described it as an example of the “wussification” of America.

He was right.

Sadly, this risk-averse/avoid-pain mindset is overtaking America. Anything that entails risk is to be avoided and, when possible, banned. The breast-cancer drug Avastin has just been banned by the FDA because of a side-effect risk. Yet terminally ill breast cancer patients who understand the risks have begged to be allowed to take the drug (even Europe allows it). Peanuts and peanut butter, particularly good sources of protein for kids (because kids actually like and therefore eat peanuts and peanut butter), are banned in more and more schools because of the risk (which is far less than that of being killed by lightning) that peanut-allergic students may die in schools that do not ban peanuts. Desperately needed nuclear power plants are shelved because of the infinitesimally small risk of nuclear-waste-radiation leakage. And now an NFL game is canceled because of the risk that some fans might get into auto accidents in a snowstorm.

Americans are becoming increasingly risk-averse.

Though Governor Rendell is a Democrat, this risk aversion comes from the Left, which has made it its mission to protect people from risk. Risk may lead to pain, and the Left dreams of a pain-free life.

The most left-wing institutions in America, our universities, are therefore the most pain- and risk-averse. That is the reason for speech codes on campuses: No student should have his or her feelings hurt or ever feel “offended.” Likewise, no Christmas trees are allowed lest a non-Christian student feel not included.

That is why Yale University Press last year decided at the last minute to cancel inclusion of the Danish cartoons of Muhammad in the book it was about to publish about the Danish Muhammad cartoons! Too risky. The liberal university now stands for avoiding pain much more than for freedom of speech.

I have a sad confession to make. Whenever I hear or sing the National Anthem, I no longer fully believe its ending — “o’er the land of the free and the home of the brave.” We have many freedom loving and brave Americans — just think of those in the armed forces. But overall, risk has been banned as Americans seek to be immunized against pain.

Needless to say, the liberal Philadelphia Inquirer supported the decision to cancel the football game. And so did some of my callers who think of themselves as conservative. But all those self-identified conservative callers who supported the decision were, I noted on air, under the age of 40.

I explained to them that they have grown up in a different America than I did. The idea of telling an American that a pro-football game is canceled because he might drive in bad weather strikes a conservative over 40 as demeaning. But the young have been raised without monkey bars, dodgeball, or see-saws lest they fall and hurt themselves, and without “Merry Christmas” lest it offend; protected by parents and schools from experiencing the pain of a loss in sports; told they are wonderful when they are not; and otherwise weakened to the point where it seems perfectly natural to cancel a football game because fans may drive in bad weather.

A listener who disagreed with me sent me an e-mail asking how I would feel if my father drove to that game and died in an accident because emergency vehicles could not reach him in time. I responded by giving my correspondent my father’s e-mail address. I told him that I suspected that my father, who is a healthy 92 and fought for three years in World War II, would probably respond that he doesn’t recognize the America of today as the one he fought for 65 years ago.

That’s why the cancellations by the NFL and Yale University are important. Once the home of the brave, America is becoming the home of the risk-averse and the pain-avoiders. And when you are risk-averse you are not only less brave, you are less free. With freedom comes pain, a price more and more Americans don’t want to pay.

— Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. He may be contacted through his website, dennisprager.com.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST

Lowry: Unleash Biden!

Charen: Obama’s Education Hypocrisy -- Again



COMMENTS   21

EXPAND  

Cherub
   01/04/11 07:07

Just so Mr. Prager, the Stoic ideals of the previous generation are incomprehensible to younger Americans. Ideas have consequences, and we have raised a generation to be highly attuned to considerations of safety. This is a gift bestowed upon us by lawyers. We have an astonishing amount of regulations in our schools and workplaces that are designed to reduce risk. We put them in place in order to avoid the potential of lawsuits. We have become so innured to the restrictions that we enforce them upon ourselves even without the specter of a lawyer breathing down our backs. Mr. Prager is justified to wonder if there is any room for greatness in such a cowering and cringing citizenry. Ah, yet another example of the myriad ways in which our lives are improved by lawyers. How did we ever get along without so many of them?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 09:31

Durn it. I thought I was going to read a column about Calvin Hill.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 10:08

Use some common sense, the Eagles game was cancelled due to M-O-N-E-Y! Think of the lost dollars in concessions if they had the game in a blizzard! The NFL is all about money, they couldn't care less about the fan or his safety, as long as his wallet is present it's OK.

Why don't you look into Jeff Lurie's wind power plans and see how much he is going to get in kick-backs from the government?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 10:29

My issue with Fast Eddie's comments was that in the same breath that he disparaged Americans, he wistfully praised how they do things in China.

I get your point, Mr. Prager, but I do wish you'd addressed the entirety of Gov Rendell's asinine comments.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 10:37

MikeB - Or Kenny Hill.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 10:46

And the best part...? Now EVERY NFL team will have to consider fan safety when bad weather threatens, because Philly just opened the door to lawsuits for those teams who knowingly place their fans in harms way by playing in the snow, or rain, or overly-bright sunshine.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 10:48

I have een working on my computer to much this last few days, so my thought process went something like this after reading the above article.
norisk/children/dependent/pets/dogs/safety/outdoors/fence/"Don't Fence Me In."

Oh, give me land, lots of land under starry skies above,
Don't fence me in.
Let me ride through the wide open country that I love,
Don't fence me in.
Let me be by myself in the evenin' breeze,
And listen to the murmur of the cottonwood trees,
Send me off forever but I ask you please,
Don't fence me in.

Just turn me loose, let me straddle my old saddle
Underneath the western skies.
On my Cayuse, let me wander over yonder
Till I see the mountains rise.

I want to ride to the ridge where the west commences
And gaze at the moon till I lose my senses
And I can't look at hovels and I can't stand fences
Don't fence me in.

Oh, give me land, lots of land under starry skies,
Don't fence me in.
Let me ride through the wide open country that I love,
Don't fence me in.
Let me be by myself in the evenin' breeze
And listen to the murmur of the cottonwood trees
Send me off forever but I ask you please,
Don't fence me in

Just turn me loose, let me straddle my old saddle
Underneath the western skies
On my Cayuse, let me wander over yonder
Till I see the mountains rise.
Ba boo ba ba boo.

I want to ride to the ridge where the west commences
And gaze at the moon till I lose my senses
And I can't look at hobbles and I can't stand fences
Don't fence me in.
No.
Poppa, don't you fence me in

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 11:12

"With freedom comes pain, a price more and more Americans don’t want to pay"

*****************************

I see. If want to truly exercise freedom, I should get in my car, drive down a snowy road, and wrap it and myself around an oak tree.

Got it.

Or maybe these things should be judged by an evolving standard. For example, if the historical period in question is a time when a horrific world war is being waged by two powerful and dangerous tyrannies, then that may be a moment that calls for a more risk-prone mind-set in the populace, relative to the current time period. I'm sure we will find that fortitude again if we are called upon to do so.

But does mean we should never evaluate the need to take risks?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Anthony Leone
   01/04/11 11:36

As a huge Eagles fan, when I saw that the long range forecast was calling for snow I was really excited at the prospects of an Eagles – Vikings game played in the elements. It would have been an exciting thing to see. But when the scope of the storm became evident, canceling it was the only sensible decision. We’re not talking about a couple of inches of snow here. Anyone stuck outside in the height of that storm, which coincided with game time, which was flexed back to that time by NBC, would literally be stuck in a life and death situation. That storm was absolutely brutal. Traffic conditions around Lincoln Financial Field on a bright, sunny game day are a nightmare at best. Telling 60,000 people, sure come on down to the game, while the state had declared a state of emergency would have been incredibly irresponsible and would have put lives at risk. This wasn’t about evolving standards of how brave we are or are not. It was about common sense.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 Bugg
   01/04/11 11:52

As a season ticketholder of the Jets, seems most of the people who
are up in arms about this have never had to drive to a real NFL game in bad winter weather. I have; it's no fun, and it's also dangerous. Mr. Prager, he of the manly art of going to football games in blizzards, lives in Los Angeles, a town which failed to support 2 NFL teams despite good weather year round. Supect he hasn't shoveled out his car or salted his sidewalk in some time, if ever.

I think Philadephia and the NFL made a sensible decision. it would have been dangerous to have 70,000 fans and their cars careening around in a blizzard on icy highways. And I hope that the Super Bowl of 2014 in the awful new stadium I go to 8 times a year is not subject to those snowy conditions.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 13:15

"With freedom comes pain, a price more and more Americans don’t want to pay"

Reminds me of something one of our drill instructor sergeants said, during the Close Combat Course at Parris Island - in his unique, but remarkably profound way.

"After pain, dere's only deaf, and deaf don' hurt."

Although the point he was making, that when one finds oneself in a combat situation - especially in the extremely personal type of combat that is the hand-to-hand variety, no matter how badly hurt one might be, no matter how much pain one might be in, to survive, one must never give up.

If this latest dustup over the canceled football game is any indication, the warrior ethos to which this succinct marine sergeant was referring, which has, in the past, made us the "land of the free, and the home of the brave" is sadly, and increasingly, becoming a thing of the past.

God help us.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 13:27

Tommysr1 -- or Gary Fencik. My class.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 14:22

Whatever happened to letting the ticket holders make the decision as to whether to weather the weather or not? Indeed, it might have been such a bad storm on the way that staying home was prudent for some. But others not only are well prepared to drive in such conditions, they love the idea of watching a football game being played in the snow.

We are becoming sheep (a wether, actually) who must have authorities tells us when or if we can schedule our lives due to weather. Pathetic.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 14:56

TommySR1 - I don't know for sure, but I would imagine the costs involved with rescheduling an NFL football game would vastly outweigh the potential concession stand losses.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Alan J
   01/04/11 14:56

@Brad...the problem with letting fans decide not to go to the game is that a fairly high number would make just that decision. And not only would they keep themselves at home, but also the money that they would have spent on parking and concessions. That's an awful lot of money for an NFL owner to pass up.

This is not cowardice; this is business.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 15:09

A cancelled game was nothing compared to what the Safety Police are doing to the game of football itself. The fines, penalties and obbrobrium being dished out for perfectly good hits is sucking the life out of defenses. Tackling this year has been pathetic. Linebackers, safeties, and corners are more concerned with being fined than putting the ball carrier on the ground.

Keeping players off the field (e.g. Rodgers) because they had a mild concussion weeks prior is similarly absurd. No, head injuries aren't to be ignored, but this is ridiculous. I took so many shots to the head as a kid I thought nausea, dizziness, and a headache were normal. I turned out fine. Let them play the game already!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 15:34

MAZim - How much of the rescheduling costs are the NFL's responsibility? How much are the team's?

Being a season ticket holder for the Giants for over 37 years I have been to some extreme weather conditioned games. The worst was several years ago against the Eagles, it was huricane like. No one was there, the roads were God awful. Ice storms, snow storms etc. that's the way football is.

BTW - the new stadium is horrible, I concur with Bugg.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 15:45

Tommysr1 -- then you saw one of the most ironic and unique moments in Giants history.

It was a Monday night in the fall of 1986, and the Giants were playing the R*dsk*ns (I don't think NR allows profanity in posts). At the same time, the Mets were playing the Red Sox in the World Series. Every other fan at Giants Stadium seemed to be holding a Sony Watchman. There was a moment when, simultaneously, Keith Hernandez hit an RBI single while a R*dsk*n (It could have been Art Monk) caught a long bomb and was tackled at the Giants' 2. At that moment, the stadium erupted in cheers!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/04/11 17:54

Of course a politician, Democrat or Republican, will never pass up a chance to score some points with the voters. It looks macho to stand up for never canceling a game.

Is it so clear that this was not a business decision? I mean if only half the seats are full and the restaurants and bars are empty.

I am not from that part of the country so I did not follow this story but it sounds like a decision about money not safety. Safety was the excuse...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Adam
   01/05/11 06:32

Mr Prager does not seem to understand the concept of risk.

Risk can be a good thing––when you get a return from it. For example I invest in the stock market, which is of course risky. Mr Prager seems to think that my willingness to accept risk is laudable, but in truth I do it not because I am brave, but because I expect a higher long term rate of return to compensate me for the volatility and occasional losses. No sensible person would enter into a situation where they could lose half their money in a few weeks if they didn’t get something concrete for doing so.

However many risks don't entail any possible return, and it is laudible to reduce or eliminate risk in these situations. This is exactly what the officials in Philadelphia did with regard to the football game. Nothing substantial would have been gained from holding the game on Sunday versus pushing it back two days––except perhaps for the NFL’s reputation for being willing to play games in a blizzard, which is of no concrete value to anyone. Indeed far more people probably came to see the game due to its postphonement, a net benefit which alone would have justified putting the game off. But in addition to this by pushing the game back by two days officials probably kept several thousand football fans from driving in dangerious conditions and potentially being trapped by a blizzard. Risk is reduced at no real cost to society. This is a good thing, and the officials who made the decision are to be congratulated for their common sense.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact