Last week, following the murder of six people and the attempted murder of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona, the American people were given a vivid display of the single most important tactic of the Left: libeling opponents.
Most Americans have been naively and blissfully unaware of this aspect of the Left’s arsenal against the Right. But now, just as more Americans than ever before understand the Left’s limitless appetite for political power in an ever-expanding state, more Americans than ever before understand that a key to the Left’s success is defaming the Right.
Advertisement
I do not recall any major American daily attacking another major American daily the way the Wall Street Journal attacked the New York Times last week under the heading “The New York Times has crossed a moral line.” I do not recall Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer ever expressing contempt toward a colleague the way he did against New York Times columnist Paul Krugman last week. Krauthammer ended his column “Massacre, Followed by Libel,” with this sentence: “The origins of Loughner’s delusions are clear: mental illness. What are the origins of Krugman’s?”
People are awakening to the crucial fact of left-wing success: The only way the Left can succeed in America is by libeling the Right. Only 20 percent of Americans label themselves liberal, let alone leftist. How, then, do leftists get elected? And why don’t more Americans call themselves conservative, when, in fact, so many share conservatives’ values?
The answer to both questions is that, through its dominance of the news media, entertainment media, and educational institutions, the Left has been able to successfully demonize the Right for at least half a century.
The Left rarely convinces Americans to adopt its views. What it does is create a fear of the Right that influences many Americans to align themselves with the Left.
For example, most Americans want to retain the man-woman definition of marriage. Even most voters in liberal Californians want to. The Left has not been able to convince even Californians to redefine marriage to include members of the same sex. So what the Left did was to declare as “haters” all those who wanted California to retain the definition of marriage as uniting a man and a woman. Prop 8 became “Prop Hate.”
But the Left’s modus operandi was never as apparent as it was this past week when it took a tragic mass killing of innocents by a violent, mentally ill individual and transformed it — within hours — into an attack on the decency of the Right — specifically Sarah Palin, the Tea Party, FoxNews, and talk radio.
The same Left, led by the New York Times, that warned against making any quick assumptions that Islam had played any role in Maj. Nidal Hassan’s murder of 13 people and wounding of 30 others at Fort Hood, immediately declared that the Arizona murders were largely a result of a “climate of hate” induced by Sarah Palin and other conservatives.
It wasn’t true. They knew it wasn’t true. And, yes, it was a libel.
But when you control all the major news media, Hollywood, much of rest of the culture, and most of the high schools and colleges, how are most people supposed to realize that?
What makes last week different is this: The Left, for the first time, does not have the same monopoly over mass information and the Republican Party is no longer emasculated. There is talk radio, there is the internet, there is FoxNews, and there is a vigorous, conservative Republican Party. So, when the Left unleashed its libel against the Right, claiming that it was responsible for a “climate of hate” that produced Jared Loughner, to its shock, America did not lie down and believe it. Many millions did, as usual. But for those with eyes to see, it was a false accusation, and for many, for the first time, it provided a clear view into how the Left operates.
As it becomes ever more obvious that Loughner’s crimes had nothing — absolutely nothing — to do with conservatives, the Left will do three things: change the subject by criticizing Sarah Palin’s use of the term “blood libel” (a term whose use by Palin was honorably defended by Prof. Alan Dershowitz, a prominent Jewish liberal); deny it ever really blamed the Right for the Loughner’s crimes (hoping, with good reason, that Americans have a short memory); and continue to blame the Right for creating the “climate of hate” that the Left itself has created.
That is why it is important for conservatives and honorable liberals not to allow Americans to forget what the Left did last week. It is the key to giving conservatives the good name they deserve. And it is the key to giving the Left the name it deserves.
— Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. He may be contacted through his website, dennisprager.com.
I think the Conservatives missed a good counterpoint. Instead of defending themselves aqgainst the libelous charges, they should have first went along with the Left, and second, should have called for the "reform" of Hollywood television and movie content, banning of violent video games, as well as the liberal hate speech that's promoted in many college classrooms. Go for the clean sweep...if political speech can be dangerous and spur someone to commit an act of violence, surely everything else should be fair game as well. Then we'd see how the Left would respond to such a proposal.
Why don't we call the "Left" Liberals any longer? It certainly has a more accurate connotation.
"The Left". Yep, nice and bland. Can't tell a thing about their motivations or beliefs from that.
In answer to a question asked by a commenter in the NYT… What is it about Sara Palin that causes the Media both left and right to focus so intently on her?
Could it be that she is a Christian? Not just any Christian but a traditional pro-life, scripture is the Word of God Christian un-ashamed of her beliefs. But in the politically correct environment of today criticism or even discussion of one religious beliefs is strictly taboo. So she is ridiculed relentlessly about EVERYTHING regardless of the merit. Could it be that her attackers are nothing more that talented but intolerant closet bigots hiding behind a veil of eloquence . Lets add CHRISTOPHOBIA to the growing list of real and imagined fears.
Could it be that she is a God loving, pro-life, traditional marriage supporting, God fearing, Bible believing Christian?
I don't think so. If their hate were that simplistic - they would have attacked Christine O'Donnell as well...:)
The episode followed algal bloom dynamics:
(1) Cravenly push a once-successful gambit;
(2) Repeat with increasing audacity to the point of ludicrousness;
(3) Collapse in a discredited heap.
Two points I have been trying to validate -- (some quick research results from Pew Research Center below.)
1) Does the MSM give themselves too much credit for impact on viewers & listeners ? It appears far more people don't watch any news
2) Even if you think it is important to account for those who do watch and listen it looks like conservative outlets' viewers and listeners are dwarfed in numbers (by about 10 to 1) compared to mainstream outlets we know are progressive-biased.
So who's messages and rhetoric are most likely to be heard ??
Here's my crude findings (no surprises to most of us but thought absolute numbers were relevant)
Radio :
Rush "20 mil" figure supposedly overstated -- MediaMatters estimates 1.4 to 2 mil listeners (External Link)
Compare to NPR - 26 mil (who seems to attract more "rich guys" -- 53% are men and 44% make over $75K versus Rush at 60% men but 34% making more than $75K) [http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1795}
Network TV: 22 mil viewers
Cable: Fox News about 2 mil, CNN and MSNBC combines about 1.2 mil viewers (External Link)
News Magazines -- top 7 (Atlantic, New Yorker, Economist, The Week, Time, Newsweek, US NEws and World Report) about 10 mil in circulation -- see any conservative rag in this list ? (External Link)
MSM fearmongering and narrative control predominate.
Violence is rarely based purely on ideas. To get people to kill for political reasons, the killer has to see it as a religious quest (Islam, naturalism (communism/socialism/liberalism)) or become convinced that they are utterly powerless to effect change in any other way.
There's little we can do about the crazies. But we can try to keep people from feeling powerless by crushing utterly every attempt to stifle political speech. That's the surest path to violence - tell people to shut up.
The Left would respond to such proposals the same way they always do-by screaming their first amendment rights are being "threatened"- notice I said "their"rights, because it should be obvious to everyone by now that the Left thinks that only they are entitled to free speech.
The Left would respond to such proposals the same way they always do-by screaming their first amendment rights are being "threatened"- notice I said "their"rights, because it should be obvious to everyone by now that the Left thinks that only they are entitled to free speech.
Mr. Prager - I agree with you entirely. The only thing you missed was how the Left views itself - as being pure of all evil - only the Right is evil (no matter what the Right says or does).
Geoph - I think it is a good thing they stopped being called Liberals. There is nothing liberal about the so-called liberals, except how liberal they are with other people's money.
Enigma - Great point. I wish I had thought of it. Maybe Loughner saw one too many Friday the 13th movies.
Perhaps if conservatives ignored the ridiculous claims made by the left and focused the energy used to defend "The Right" on what really needs doing, the country would be in a better place.
In other words, if you believe you are right, and you DO what you believe to be right, what results will prove to all that you ARE right. Pointing fingers and trying to prove who is wrong in theory has gotten us no where. I'm looking for leaders who can, and will, DO what is best for America.
Start back at the beginning. What sparked the beginning of the end of the America that the "Greatest Generation" fought for with pride and commitment? Do what it takes to give us back THAT America and you won't need the media to defend your beliefs.