Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

May 28 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Biden Rails On
He’s always been a buffoon. The new danger is that people start taking him seriously.

By Jonah Goldberg


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

What do Yasser Arafat, Jon Stewart, and Joe Biden have in common?

Well, let’s see. Yasser Arafat, the carbuncle who used to run the Palestinian Authority, had a gift for saying what Americans wanted to hear in English and what his own murderous constituents wanted to hear in Arabic. The Western press played along for the most part, pretending that translations weren’t available.

Advertisement

Jon Stewart, the talented and liberal host of the comedy news program The Daily Show, employs a slightly different tactic where he levels blistering and earnest political attacks and then insists no one should take him seriously because he’s just a comedian. As he famously put it in a 2004 CNN debate, “The show that leads into me is puppets making crank phone calls.” And yet, many of the liberal journalists atop the commanding heights of the media establishment see Stewart as their titular deity.

And then there’s Vice President Joe Biden. There’s the Joe Biden who belches boring, scripted platitudes familiar to anybody who follows politics.

And then there’s the other Joe. Crazy Joe. Wacky Joe. The Joe who punctuates his marathon-length run-on sentences with semaphore flashes of his enormous teeth, warning, “I can’t turn off my mouth!” This Joe is like the crazy relative at Thanksgiving who makes everyone feel unsafe by building a replica of Devils Tower with his mashed potatoes while loudly insisting that if only we had all switched to a macrobiotic lentil diet, the alphabet would have twice as many vowels.

Biden has outdone both Stewart and Arafat, because he never acknowledges the fact that there are (at least) two Joes. While Stewart often has to run across the border to Comedystan to defend himself, and Arafat had to speak in an entirely different tongue, Biden switches back and forth seamlessly between the two personalities.

This in and of itself is not a new observation. Biden has been the subject of gentle mockery for decades. The number of Bidenisms more suitable for a sitcom’s wacky-neighbor character is too big to count. Remember his response to the 9/11 terror attacks? While the towers were still smoldering, then-senator Biden turned to an emergency meeting of his staff and said, “Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran.”

The staff reportedly reacted like they wished he’d get back to the bit about the all-lentil diet.

Even President Obama, whose “first presidential decision” was tapping Biden to be his running mate (that should have been a red flag right there) has gotten in on the act. During his first address to Congress, Obama declared, “Nobody messes with Joe!” the same way jocks yell, “Nobody messes with the water boy!” All that was missing was a noogie from the commander-in-chief.

What’s different now is that the two Bidens seem not only to be merging, but to be gaining influence inside the White House.

Biden, like a lot of eccentrics, loves to play with trains. What makes him different is that he prefers real ones. As a senator, he famously rode Amtrak to get home to Delaware. And because he failed to understand that what worked for him might not work for everyone, he’s funneled billions of dollars to a passenger-rail system that cannot survive in the market. If he had the same response to a great plate of chicken wings, he’d want a subsidy for that too.

Biden’s real passion is high-speed rail, which wastes money at two to three times the speed of conventional passenger rail. Never mind that high-speed rail would destroy our freight-rail system, which is the best in the world (and quite green), or that it would crush state budgets with federally imposed white elephants. Biden has convinced the president that this is the only way to “win the future.” Obama made that case during his last State of the Union address. And just the other day, while campaigning in Florida, Biden told reporters that he and Sen. Bill Nelson (D., Fla.) and the president are “focused on literally — it sounds like a trite phrase — but literally winning the future.”

Thank goodness they’re not just figuratively focused on winning the future. They’re quite literal about it. Charlie Sheen talks about winning figuratively, but not our Joe — and not the president of the United States, apparently.

And that’s what’s so dismaying: People are taking Joe seriously. Don’t be surprised if after the next terrorist attack, the president proposes giving Iran a brand new high-speed rail system.

 Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. © 2011 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST

Lowry: Unleash Biden!

Keune: 'Clean Coal' Means No Coal



COMMENTS   20

EXPAND  

   03/25/11 08:54

"Biden has been the subject of gentle mockery for decades."

It is well past time that he become the subject of vitriolic mockery. I'm tired of the REAL Biden making even the liberal cariacture of GWB look intelligent. As I have said many times before I passed and flushed something far more intelligent then Joe Biden after dinner last night.

And if they are going to "win" the future, who is going to lose it? Either it's a one horse race, which means it doesn't matter what they do, or someone is going to lose. In the case of Obama/Biden, if they win, America, Americans, and the world all lose.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 09:41

But Biden has sold monorails to Brockway, Ogdenville and North Haverbrook! How can he be wrong?

"I swear it's Springfield's only choice... Monorail, Monorail, Monorail...."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Cherub
   03/25/11 09:54

Does anyone remember the sustained and vicious mockery that Dan Quail endured? Every time Quail spoke, the press was poised to construe his utterance in the most unflattering way. What fun we all had at Quail's expense. My point is that J. Danforth Quail's unguarded comments were nothing compared to the low-hanging comic fruit that Joe Biden offers almost daily. How easy it would be for the press to deflate that flatulent wind-bag and expose him as the master of inconsequence he is. Alas, to do so would damage the Annointed One, and so we must pretend that Biden's arguments are cogent, his observations trenchant and his policies potent.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 10:41

Sarcasm fails when spelling goes bye-bye.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
B. L. Oviate
   03/25/11 11:13

I can't stop laughing!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 11:35

"Biden, like a lot of eccentrics, loves to play with trains. What makes him different is that he prefers real ones."

Absolutely priceless line!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 12:08

Nothing wrong with lentils if there's lots of bacon in 'em.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 12:23

Joe Biden has said so many stupid things that there's an entire web site dedicated to recording them:

External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 13:15

"Even President Obama, whose “first presidential decision” was tapping Biden to be his running mate (that should have been a red flag right there) has gotten in on the act."

For many of us (Goldboig included), this wasn't the first, but the media sure was all over it like it was a good decision. Probably because he finally made a decision...what a relief.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 13:30

The American Socialist Republic should have high-speed trains just like the European socialist republics do.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mary Triola
   03/25/11 16:06

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if good ol Joe was picked to make bho look so smart. The man has been riding the government coat tails forever. It's a shame the people of Delaware are so STUPID. The man is a walking talking disaster.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/25/11 21:38

Every time I hear "win the future", I think about the X-Files phrase, "Fight the Future!"

I cannot understand the liberal defense of paying more for things on the basis of some perceived moral superiority. Moral judgments are personal and based on one's worldview, often tinged with religion. We don't all share the same quasi-religious values. I don't mind Biden and others believing that HSR is a great thing, but I object to paying (tax dollars) to support these beliefs I don't share. The math isn't working.

Even at that, if there were true believers that wanted to pay extra (e.g. people who believe iPhones etc. are actually more useful), I have no objection. Let the course of action support itself. This is supposed to be a business proposition. It works more like a bridge to nowhere.

Mass transportation has some serious flaws in this country. It is not convenient for most people. You have to go where it goes and when it goes. You may need to arrange transportation from a station where you board or debark to the actual location you start from or end at. It also makes you an easier victim of crime, especially if you ride during off hours. The criminal can time his crime as the train approaches a station so he can get off when he's done.

People in general do not want to ride trains, high-speed or otherwise. This does not mean the government has to fund it, it means it is a bad idea.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Old Bill
   03/26/11 09:08

Every time I hear "win the future", I think, "W T F ?!"

Too funny!

That's also what comes to mind whenever I hear Joe Bidden's name or "high speed rail".

What a farce!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/26/11 11:39

Unfortunately, increasing gas prices make these commuter choo-choo ideas more plausible in voters' minds. It's also a big shame because we seem to be going in that direction precisely at a moment when WHERE we do our work is becoming less and less important. As for ol' Joe, I'm still not over his Soviet radar goof or his roll in stabbing Robert Bork in the back when he was Chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/26/11 12:22

According to the Daily Rash, last summer Biden got rip roaring drunk at a White House picnic and was reprimanded by Obama! External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/26/11 12:31

J-Go:
"Biden, like a lot of eccentrics, loves to play with trains."

Absolutely money.

To paraphrase Niles Standish (one of those muppets that leads into John Stewart): Whatever NRO is paying you, they should DOUBLE it!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 MAFV
   03/26/11 14:42

Mr. Goldberg, thanks for the laugh. Go to joebidensaidthat.com - the "meatball" is priceless...

What Fun!!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/27/11 11:20

In the 2008 election cycle, Obama became the Dems presidential candidate; Obama selected Biden as his running mate; Delaware voted for Obama with 62% of the vote; Obama became president; Biden became the "former" senator from Delaware.

Coincidence? Hmmmmm.....

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/28/11 13:42

Speaking as another eccentric who likes to play with trains, HSR, like Joe Biden's opinions, is a complete waste on every dimension one can consider.

Fixed path transportation (i.e., roads and rail) are useful ONLY when the established infrastructure provides a robust network, one that hits all important destinations as well as a large number of secondary ones; Roads do that. Absent an investment much greater than the magnitude of the Interstate Highway System (which of course leveraged the state and local road networks), any passenger rail system, much less a HSR system, will simply never have the necessary network to be a productive investment.

So why does anyone want to build such a thing? IMO, shallow thinkers like Biden, who have enjoyed a rail commute, simply draw the conclusion that if they liked it, so will everyone else. Practical issues that require a minimum of thoughtful consideration, escape people like Biden and other devotees of HSR.

Chalk it up to more Federal spending nonsense spoken by nonsensical people.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Neal P
   03/28/11 19:03

I was hoping you'd point out the contrast with how the media treated Quayle versus how they treat Biden.

Or Biden's college grades with Bush's.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact