Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

March 5 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Battling Big Abortion
The truth about the debate over defunding Planned Parenthood

By Rep. Mike Pence


Archive Latest RSS Send

On Feb. 18, 2011, with bipartisan support, the House of Representatives passed the Pence Amendment, which would end taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood. In response, Planned Parenthood used its vast resources to launch slick Madison Avenue television ads portraying the group — the nation’s largest abortion provider — as an altruistic organization that provides health-care services to the poor and has only an incidental interest in abortion.

Despite efforts to suggest otherwise, the Pence Amendment does not reduce funding for cancer screenings or eliminate one dime of funding for other important health services to women; the money that does not go to Planned Parenthood as a result of the Pence Amendment will go to other organizations that provide these services. If the Pence Amendment becomes law, thousands of women’s health centers, clinics, and hospitals will still provide assistance to low-income families and women. The Pence Amendment would simply deny any and all federal funding to Planned Parenthood.

Advertisement
Planned Parenthood clinics focus mainly on abortion — and because money is fungible, there is no way to fund the useful services without freeing up money for the organization to spend on abortion. In 2009, the group made only 977 adoption referrals and cared for only 7,021 prenatal clients, but performed a record 332,278 abortions. In other words, a pregnant woman entering a Planned Parenthood clinic was 42 times more likely to have an abortion than to either receive prenatal care or be referred for adoption. Planned Parenthood recently made plain the centrality of abortion to its mission by mandating that every one of its affiliates have at least one clinic that performs abortions within the next two years.

Advocates for the abortion industry have sought to portray efforts to defund Planned Parenthood as a “War on Women,” but the issue is big business, and that business is abortion. This legislative battle is about Big Abortion vs. American taxpayers. As Abby Johnson, a former Planned Parenthood director, recently said, “Planned Parenthood’s mission, on paper, is to give women quality and affordable health care and to protect women’s rights. In reality, their mission is to increase their abortion numbers and in turn increase their revenue.”

According to its most recent annual report, the organization raked in $1.1 billion in total revenue. Of that amount, $363.2 million came from taxpayers in the form of government grants and contracts. While current law prohibits Planned Parenthood from directly using tax dollars on abortions, taxpayers subsidize its overall operation, freeing up funds that can be diverted to direct spending on abortion.

And for all the talk about how poor women would be harmed if taxpayers stopped subsidizing Big Abortion, it is telling to see how Planned Parenthood is spending its money. According to a June 2008 story in the Wall Street Journal, Planned Parenthood was flush with cash and using its profits to rebrand itself. The effort was designed to build the business by targeting wealthy consumers to complement their existing customer base of poor and minority populations. While taxpayers underwrite its operations, Planned Parenthood is building luxury health centers in shopping centers and malls, designed by marketing experts with touches such as hardwood floors, muted lighting, and large waiting rooms.

And Big Abortion routinely puts profits over women’s health and safety. When women testify in favor of tightening safety standards at clinics, Planned Parenthood fights them. And despite the fact that 88 percent of Americans favor informed-consent laws that provide information about the risks of, and alternatives to, abortion for women, Planned Parenthood opposes these efforts and works to keep women in the dark. And tragically, in some instances, Planned Parenthood has refused to cooperate when law-enforcement officials have sought information to help girls they believed to be victims of child rape or molestation.

The nation’s largest abortion provider also offers some helpful services, but that should not translate into Americans’ being forced to fund them. Many organizations that provide charitable services, such as the Salvation Army, do not expect to be underwritten by American taxpayers. Why should Big Abortion be the exception?

As Abby Johnson has said, “There are better uses of our money. Planned Parenthood provides shabby, limited health care.” If supporters of Planned Parenthood wish to support the organization, they have every right to do so, but they should not expect everyone else to sign the check.

The time has come to deny any and all federal funding to Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

— Rep. Mike Pence is a Republican congressman from Indiana.

You Might Also Like...

Nordlinger: One Mo’ Time

Symposium: The Mesa Debate

Trinko: Santorum in Arizona



COMMENTS   63

EXPAND  

Jodie Pessolano
   03/31/11 06:00

Thank you, Congressman Pence. Our nation is 14 trillion in debt with over 100 trillion in unfunded obligations. If we can't say no to purveyors of abortion and enablers of child molesters, we won't be able to say no to anything. If ever there's a hill worth dying on, this is it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
thebardofmurdock
   03/31/11 06:57

Planned Parenthood
With apologies to Joyce Kilmer, author of Trees

I thought that I would never see
A program sacred as P.P.

A program that Barack will back
Against the GOP attack.

A program Biden will defend
Against the budget cutting trend.

A program for which Nancy fights
Beneath the flag of women's rights.

A program for which Harry Reid
Would shutter government indeed.

When deficits begin to squeeze
We see their true priorities.

While other programs come and go
This sacred cow must stay just so.

thebardofmurdock.com

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 08:57

Pro-lifers are asking the wrong question.

The right one is,

"In your opinion, can a nation whose laws allow the taking of innocent human life remain civilized?"

And the person answering may define the terms anyway he likes.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Matthew Basiletti
   03/31/11 09:05

Yes, yes, yes! Gut "Planned Parenthood"- yes expose them for what they are- planned infanticide dealers whose agenda is working to ruin our society; whose wonton machinations have snuffed the innocent lives of millions. Their blood cries out from the dirt.

Why would even a cent that I've earned ever be forfeit to this movement? Thank you Mr. Pence, and please keep up this fight.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 09:39

Women have the right to an abortion. Planned Parenthood should be protected as virtually all other independent abortion providers have been terrorized, intimidated, and in some case murdered, out of existence.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 09:42

Representative Pence, you are absolutely correct. Please stand firm in this important battle to defund a blatantly racist organization which only serves its own profit margin.

Anyone who has ever read what founder Margaret Sanger actually wrote and believed should be ashamed of supporting Planned Parenthood. She was a firm eugenicist whom Hitler admired and emulated.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Shaeri
   03/31/11 09:58

Smithers, you're right. By law women have a right to have an abortion. However, I have a right NOT to fund them. You, however, since you care so much about their financial stability, are free to support them with your own money.

I think there have been three (3) murders of abortion providers in over 20 years. According to this article, Planned Parenthood aborted (in my mind murdered) 332,728 babies last year. How many in 20 years?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:09

Thank you, Rep. Pence,for standing up for the unborn who have no voice other than those who are pro-life. All life is precious in God's eyes, as He is the creator of all. I hope and pray that your amendment will pass and Planned Parenthood will be defunded from all taxpayer dollars!!!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:11

Amen. I should have the right and the choice to withhold my tax dollars from going into the pot of genocide. Pay for your own abortions and birth control.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:11

No, you don't have a "right" not to fund them. You have a right to vote for congressmen who support your position. Planned Parenthood provides a vital service, especially in otherwise underserved communities, and the American public has supported Planned Parenthood for years and I expect they will continue to do so. The Democrats will not pass or sign a bill that ends funding.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:16

PJ O Rourke said it best," the message from the left on abortion to the people with brown skin that don't speak very good english is 'there is just enough of me and way too much of you' "

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:22

SmithersJones: As usual, you assume the conclusion. First off, it is not universally recognized that women have an absolute, unlimited right to an abortion.

Secondly, even if women did have a right to an abortion, that doesn't mean they have a right to have someone else pay for that abortion. (Does the 2nd ammendment mean that the govt has to buy me a gun?)

Thirdly, this so called terrorism against abortion providers exists for the most part in your own mind and no where else. Yes, there have been acts of violence against abortion providers, one or two cases over 20 to 30 years.

The vast majority of people who have refused to provide such services do so because they find them to be morally objectionable.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:23

Like most liberals, SmithersJones won't put any money where his mouth is, he wants everyone else to pay instead.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:24

Smither - And, we have the RIGHT to vote those Deemocrats out of office.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:27

I love the SJ just declares that the people have no rights, and that govt has no limits on its powers.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:35

Smithersjones just proved that the left is not pro choice rather pro abortion.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
SCC
   03/31/11 10:44

I love how the left never discusses this issue in terms of religious dissent. It is perfectly fine to be a "conscientious objector" when it comes to an unpopular war, but you cannot withhold your tax dollars for abortion, even though you have deep religious objections to the practice. You are simply branded a racist.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:48

A view from the left: I forcefully steal from you to pay for me to murder a baby, you have no right to object. That is what they call pro choice.

My version of pro choice is choosing not to fund these bratty college girls. Pay for your own murders. You are not my responsibility.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/31/11 10:49

The sad irony of this is that the government is spending the tax dollars of yet-to-be-conceived babies to abort said babies' aunts and uncles.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact