Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

May 28 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
A True Path to Prosperity
Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan offers sobriety and hope.

By Deroy Murdock


About Author Archive Latest RSS Send
Text  

House Budget chairman Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) must have been one of those elementary-school kids who spent recess fine-tuning his homework while the other boys and girls climbed trees and yanked each other’s hair. Little has changed as many of those children won congressional seats. They are older, but hardly wiser.

“This plan would literally be a death trap for seniors,” shrieked Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D., Fla.), Pres. Barack Obama’s recently designated Democratic National Committee chairwoman. Ryan’s economic blueprint, “The Path to Prosperity,” calls for “waging war on American workers,” screeched Rep. Xavier Becerra (D., Calif.).

Advertisement

Washington Democrats totally controlled Congress and the White House last year. Nonetheless, they dodged their duty to adopt a Fiscal Year 2011 budget, thus triggering today’s stopgap spending bills and government-shutdown talk. Meanwhile, Ryan’s comprehensive proposal would tame the tsunami of red ink that could drown America. He does this while cutting taxes, fueling entrepreneurship, and spurring economic growth. Still, he somehow is the bad guy who murders Granny and hurls grenades at laborers.

The juvenile reaction to Ryan’s measure is especially frustrating because his plan offers such a mature approach to America’s fiscal predicament. Indeed, “The Path to Prosperity” goes far beyond charts and spreadsheets. The inspiring rhetoric and patriotic allusions of Ryan’s manifesto advance cherished national virtues:

This budget offers America a model of government guided by the timeless principles of the American Idea: free market democracy, open competition, a robust private sector bound by rules of honesty and fairness, a secure safety net, and equal opportunity for all under a limited constitutional government of popular consent.

How extreme — like a Fourth of July picnic.

● Ryan would cut spending over the next decade by $6.2 trillion from Obama’s budget. This would return Washington’s slice of the economy to its historical average, below 20 percent, rather than Obama’s 23 percent spending floor.

● Ryan would eliminate $2.3 trillion in tax hikes, including $800 billion avoided by repealing Obamacare.

● Ryan would combine hundreds of overlapping programs, scrap others, and reform some, such as Medicare. While leaving beneficiaries over age 55 untouched, Ryan’s plan would give future retirees funds to help them purchase their choice of health coverage, rather than one Washington-dictated plan. Similarly, instead of a single federal Medicaid model, governors and state legislators would use federal block grants to serve the diverse needs of poor people in, say, Arizona and Vermont.

“The U.S. government is not running sustained deficits because Americans are taxed too little. The government is running deficits because it spends too much,” Ryan’s plan continues. It adds, “Over the past 40 years, government revenue has averaged between 18 percent and 19 percent of GDP. This level has generally been compatible with prosperity, even though there is broad agreement that the structure of the tax code should be simplified and made more conducive to economic growth, high wages, and entrepreneurship.”

Hence, the Path closes deductions and loopholes and lowers top individual and corporate taxes to 25 percent. This outright tax relief would end America’s 35 percent business levy, the industrial world’s highest.

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST

Lowry: Unleash Biden!

Keune: 'Clean Coal' Means No Coal



COMMENTS   5

EXPAND  

   04/08/11 12:54

I think the previous Congress already has the title of, "the Congress that did nothing as the nation slouched toward a preventable debt crisis and irreversible decline".

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
SeanDMcG
   04/08/11 14:17

Unfortunately, rinfrel, they did far too much, but just didn't do what they should have done.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
F.D. O'Toole
   04/08/11 15:41

Murdock is so clear and logical!
A pleasure to read.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 LAD
   04/08/11 17:08
   04/09/11 00:47

For the record, the "history" of government spending as a percentage of GPD is this:

Before WWII, federal spending was below 7 percent of GDP. It was around 3 percent before WWI (when America was already a superpower, by any standard). It balloned during WWII to 24 percent but went back down to 15 percent in 1950.

It's about 26 percent now.

One question to ask is what all the social welfare spending bought us? Higher divorce rates, out-of-wedlock rates over 40 percent, and an epidemic of drug abuse and addiction.

Gee, I'd rather spend my own money, thank you.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact