Tim Pawlenty may have been the featured speaker at the Tax Day rally held last week in Boston, but few in the assembled crowd considered themselves Pawlenty supporters.
When I asked around about Pawlenty, almost every person I talked to said the same thing: They didn’t know much about him.
“Pawlenty’s a good, strong conservative. I honestly don’t know enough about him to say he’s my guy. I’m very picky,” said one attendee named Maria, who like many of those I spoke to declined to give her last name. “He [Pawlenty] may not be tough enough,” worried another tea partier, Louis. “Whoever runs against Obama is going to have to be strong.”
Advertisement
Despite Pawlenty’s obvious overtures to tea partiers in recent months, including a video entitled “Tea Party: A New Birth of Freedom,” the tea partiers present talked about other candidates for 2012, such as Sarah Palin, Herman Cain, and Donald Trump. They spoke wistfully of a Chris Christie run, enthused over Michele Bachmann, and talked about freshman House member Allen West as a possible candidate.
Christen Varley, who chairs the Greater Boston Tea Party and organized the rally, spoke positively about Pawlenty’s record as Minnesota governor and his political beliefs.
“It’s all about jobs which create tax revenue,” said Varley, talking about what was needed for an economic recovery. “It’s not about raising taxes and causing jobs to be lost. It’s about creating more jobs, and that’s best done by the private sector. Pawlenty understands that.”
But there was also a convenience factor in Pawlenty’s invite: A friend of Varley’s had a mutual friend with Pawlenty, and was able to put Varley in touch with the campaign. “Tim Pawlenty was in New Hampshire this morning [for a speech],” said Varley. “So it was just really fortuitous that he was in the area. It’s hard to get presidential candidates to show up, because they want to be everywhere.”
One boon for Pawlenty is that his prospective candidacy drew little opposition from the tea partiers. That wasn’t the case for Mitt Romney, who elicited divided reactions among the Massachusetts crowd, some of whom praised his business acumen while others blasted Romneycare. (One reaction to Romney: “Romney? I’ll become Canadian. He ruined the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.”)
Donald Trump also generated mixed reactions, with some laughing off his candidacy and others saying they were fans. “If Donald Trump runs, I think I’m going to vote for him, because he’s telling it like it is,” a woman named Pat said.
Unlike Trump, Pawlenty has made it clear that he is serious about a presidential run in recent weeks, announcing an exploratory committee and a series of high-profile hires, including former Republican Governors Association director Nick Ayers as campaign manager, pollster Jon Lerner, and former John McCain adviser Jon Seaton as political director. He reported $160,000 in donations over the ten-day period after his committee launch, and is busily reaching out to more donors.
Yet many of the tea partiers still hold out hope for the emergence of a new candidate, one who holds Tea Party values, generates enthusiasm, and hasn’t been a politician so long that he or she appears to be a career or professional politician. Paul Ryan was mentioned, as was Christie. One man, undeterred by Christie’s refusal to run, hopefully spoke of a primary so divided that a surprise vote by the delegates at the GOP convention could make Christie the candidate.
Pawlenty’s brief speech, which balanced slams of Obama’s record with hopeful talk about a prosperous future that conservative polices could bring, was well-received, generating cheers and claps. But while Pawlenty himself was swarmed by fans and media after the speech, most of the crowd had dissipated less than ten minutes after he had spoken. There weren’t clusters buzzing with excitement over a Pawlenty run.
Pawlenty is the best of the lot so far in my opinion. He may not be as radical as some on certain things but he is conservative on all the right issues and when he expresses them they seem eminently reasonable. He won in blue state MN and I would think he would be able to attract independents too with his common sense, common man personal story and fiscal focus. Every candidate has flaws but he seems to have by far the best balance IMHO. I don't know where the boring thing came from either, because every time I have seen him speak he is sharp, to the point, energetic and decisive. He seems to know who he is and what he believes in. We need a Leader! and he is definitely a leader. America could do far, far worse than Tim Pawlenty, including re-electing the current occupant of the White House.
It's ok if the Tea Partiers aren't in love with Pawlenty, they aren't the key to winning the presidency. The key is that if Pawlenty can win the Republican nomination with only luke warm tea party support, he'll fare better than the other Tea party candidates with independents and democrats.
“Pawlenty’s a good, strong conservative. I honestly don’t know enough about him to say he’s my guy"
and
"he'll fare better than the other Tea party candidates with independents and democrats..."
Yes, this is how we should pick a nominee for the Republican Party. Someone who independents and liberals like, and who is not TOO conservative, even though we don't know much about him. Quick, someone start a draft McCain movement on NRO.
And can we please, PLEASE drop the cutesy nick names? The man was a governor, and wants to be president. Can't we at least refer to him, and all other candidates, by their adult names?
Unfortunately, I can't get Pawlenty's flirtation with global warming out of mt mind. Anyone obstensively conservative who even considers any of AGW as valid is suspect in my book.
"Yes, this is how we should pick a nominee for the Republican Party. Someone who independents and liberals like, and who is not TOO conservative, even though we don't know much about him. Quick, someone start a draft McCain movement on NRO."
I see your point but don't think that's The Point. I'm sure everyone wold like to have a through and through conservative in there. But the point is we need someone Electable. Trump has been right that no one could have beaten Obama the first time, no one. And unfortunately Obama is still personally appealable and may just have some sort of economic recovery and foreign policy stabilization/success at election time. Every single candidate has "weaknesses" and "suspect" positions they have taken in their life but it seems to me that Gov. Pawlenty has fewer of those than most, and is plenty conservative enough. I would dare say only he, Romney, Christie and Huckabee have real chances in the general. And Pawlenty is not a bad choice from that list, and certainly the best of the two running so far.
And, again...I just don't see the lack of chutzpah anymore.