Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
How to Balance the Budget and Create Long-Term Growth
My plan to solve our debt crisis.

By Sen. Pat Toomey


Archive Latest RSS Send
Text  

As I traveled across Pennsylvania last year, I promised Pennsylvanians that I would dedicate myself to two key priorities in the United States Senate: restoring economic growth and private-sector job creation, and putting our federal government on a sustainable fiscal path.

These two goals are inextricably connected. We cannot maximize economic growth without getting our government’s finances in order. And we can’t get our finances in order if we don’t have the courage to make serious and tough choices right now.

Today, we are barreling toward a fiscal crisis like a downhill freight train. A few weeks ago, Standard & Poor’s essentially threatened to downgrade the United States’ AAA credit rating unless policymakers reduce our budget deficits. This announcement stunned the political and financial world, but after years of reckless spending it should not have come as a surprise.

Advertisement

In only the past decade — since 2000 — total federal spending has doubled. Last year’s level reached 24 percent of our nation’s economy — a post-WWII record and far higher than recent years have averaged. This spending surge has resulted in massive, record-breaking deficits. As recently as 2007, our deficit was only 1.2 percent of our gross domestic product. This year it is over 9 percent, or $1.4 trillion. Our government is borrowing about 40 cents of every dollar it spends.

The recent, huge deficits have, inevitably, created a mountain of debt. Over the past 20 years, our debt had remained fairly constant as a percentage of our national output, averaging about 41 percent of GDP. Today it’s 64 percent. It’s going to be 69 percent of GDP by October. This trajectory is clearly unsustainable.

President Obama and congressional Democrats have refused to show the leadership our country needs. The president’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2012 includes massive tax increases that will strangle job creation when our country is still struggling with an unacceptably high unemployment rate. His budget only exacerbates our fiscal crisis, adding $9.5 trillion to our national debt over the next ten years. And the president’s budget is silent on the major entitlement programs that are driving our medium-term deficits.

But at least the president proposed a budget, however inadequate. That is more than can be said for the Democratic-controlled Senate, which appears poised to go a second consecutive year without passing any budget at all.

This is an abdication of leadership that has to end. We need real spending cuts now, along with programmatic entitlement reforms and pro-growth tax policies. Together, they will put our government on a sustainable fiscal path and our economy in a strong growth mode. Congress needs to demonstrate the ability and the will to balance the federal budget within a reasonable time frame.

That is why I am introducing, along with a number of my Senate Republican colleagues, a responsible and commonsense budget for fiscal year 2012 that balances the budget in nine years.

My budget reaches a $50 billion surplus in 2021. It does so by gradually reducing spending to 18.5 percent of GDP and recognizing the strong economic growth that would accompany restored fiscal discipline and pro-growth tax policy. It reduces our publicly held debt from this year’s 69 percent of GDP to 52 percent by 2021. In short, it demonstrates that it is possible to balance our budget without job-crushing tax increases.

While Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid all require structural reforms soon, it is neither necessary nor politically feasible to take them all on at once. Focusing on just the current ten-year budget window, my budget makes no changes to Social Security. Changes to Medicare are limited to restoring the fictitious and unspecified cuts projected in the president’s budget. For Medicaid, we adopt an approach similar to that of the House budget — block-granting Medicaid funding to the states at reduced levels, while giving the states flexibility to devise their own systems for providing health care to the poor.

For defense spending, my budget adopts an approach similar to the one in the House-passed budget and the president’s budget. My budget, however, gradually phases out funding for the wars in Iraq in Afghanistan by 2018. Non-defense discretionary spending is reduced to 2006 levels and frozen for the subsequent six years. Mandatory spending apart from the big three entitlement programs is gradually reduced to slightly above 2007 levels by 2014, and then allowed to grow at the rate of consumer prices, with certain particularly misguided programs such as farm subsidies taking bigger cuts.

Reducing our deficit is just one part of the plan to get our economy moving again. Like the House-passed budget, my budget calls for job-creating, across-the-board tax reform that will enable us to dramatically accelerate economic growth.

I propose to dramatically simplify the tax code by eliminating special-interest tax credits and carve-outs for politically chosen winners. My budget would consolidate the current six individual-income-tax brackets into three, cut the top individual- and corporate-tax rates to 25 percent, and index the Alternative Minimum Tax for inflation. It would also move us to a territorial tax system so that we would no longer hinder economic growth by subjecting overseas profits of American corporate subsidiaries to double taxation. 

I am not aware of any country that has ever dramatically grown its government, spent well beyond its means, run massive deficits, accumulated huge debts, monetized large portions of them, and then lived happily ever after. We won’t be the first. We will either stay on our current path and suffer the inevitable consequences of fiscal crisis and economic stagnation, at best; or we will change course and adopt the fiscal discipline and pro-growth reforms that will allow another American century.

The time to choose is now. And time is running out.

— Pat Toomey represents Pennsylvania in the United States Senate.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST

Lowry: Unleash Biden!

Keune: 'Clean Coal' Means No Coal



COMMENTS   18

EXPAND  

   05/11/11 09:09

So glad we elected this guy.

Although, I'm sure Arlen Specter would have had similar things to say.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 10:05

This is a sales pitch ABOUT a budget proposal. So, where is the proposed budget? Even the "details" on Toomey's web site are just more ABOUT his proposal, not the proposed budget itself. This is just more hot air.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
kennybbb
   05/11/11 11:14

Why consolidate tax brackets? What doest that do other than give the super rich an extra few million dollars a year? Which of course they deserve as they are so much better than everyone else.

cut corporate taxes to 25%? Why? They should pay a lower marginal rate than me? Yeah, that's fair.

Don't forget no taxes on dividends or estates. Always got to shill for the super rich.

Index the AMT? How about instituting an AMT for coporations so they can no longer dodge the taxes (which you want to cut anyway).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Retired Coastie
   05/11/11 11:42

Pat Toomey has done an excellent job of leading on the national issues that democrats are too scared to touch. His plan to continue debt payments in the event a debt ceiling limit is not reached was brilliant. The budget proposal is a step in the right direction. This budget along with Paul Ryans show that conservatives are leading & bringing ideas for solutions to these problems. All democrats bring are whining & tax increases.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Clinton Lovell
   05/11/11 12:50

Ten years to balance the budget? That's responsible? Huh?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 13:22

Republicans won't even get the oil companies off the federal dole. Don't hold your breath waiting for them to end "carve-outs". That would be a job killing tax increase, which is forbidden by Lord Norquist.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
cicero
   05/11/11 14:20

Why not balance the budget NOW, and pay off the national debt in 10 years? Stop the insane spending.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 14:23

Without monetary reform there will be no balanced budget - EVER! Balancing the budget with our debt-based currency will kill the money supply and swirly into a massive depression. Try getting re-elected with that on your resume!

Money as Debt 2 Promises Unleashed: External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 14:43

I see no revenues in this proposal whatever. And the only spending discipline I see is the proposal to revert discretionary spending to 2006 levels and freeze it there for 6 years. These are very weak measures.

The rest is just hope and mirrors. Pretending that growth will be stronger and peace will break out and medicaid will cost less on somebody else's plate.

Not leadership, very unimpressive.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 14:51

Dumb question: How much money does the US government actually have on hand?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 16:54

A budget plan that does not mention opening domestic drilling is incomplete. We need the revenue and the supply will help fight inflation. We get a national security boost as well. Win-win-win...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Amdoni
   05/11/11 17:11

A budget is a projected outline and sets up parameters to work within. Toomey did a great job at that! The point is an effort is being made. And the facts are Harry Reid and his minions have produced absolutely nothing in terms of a budget proposal!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/11/11 17:16

Nice try Pat but you are still trying to tiptoe your way to your definition of fiscal responsibility. Doesn't anyone in DC have a backbone anymore? Know what a respectable percentage of deficit to GDP would be? How about zero percent? That's what it should be and we wouldn't be beholden to any other foreign nation that is currently financing our debt. Sounds sensible to me. Back to you Pat.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
David Starke
   05/11/11 19:09

Beware tea party members - the republican party is not your friend. The majority of the deficit spending occured while they controlled the White House. Boehner and their ilk are just the conservative wing of the demopublican party that wants to spend your money. And Toomey is apparently one of them.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
tk
   05/12/11 08:11

And yet, this will not do anything. The problem is structure as currency is created and circulated through loans. Without loans, everything falls apart and as long as people are indebted and the population grows older, the economy will continue to shrink. The US has not had prosperity for a long time, just the illusion of it brought to you by easy credit. And the same can be said about foreign nations as they have been printing money too. In fact, since the government is printing money and bailing out banks, why have taxes at all? Why should there be any social security default? If you want prosperity, you are going to have to change the currency, eliminate all taxes, get rid of most government agencies and programs, and bring the troops home. If this is not done, the Us will ether default or print the money. Ether way everything will change and progressives are not going to like it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/13/11 12:10

This is not a serious budget proposal.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/13/11 17:31

c'mon.
Start with historical spend @20% GDP. Realize this spend was not paying for SS and MediCare(MC). Add baby-boomers and realize no way 20% will balance spend.
Reform tax codes to generate 21-22% while lowering rates. Lower rates necessary for economic growth which should be #1 objective of political class. Agree block fund medicaid.
Stop referring to SS and MC as entitlements. these programs exist because we are wealthiest country in world and want to look after our own. SS and MC are safety nets for those who don't make it in this land of opportunity - therefore means test these payments. And tax every taxable dollar, and I mean every taxable income dollar, at whatever rate necessary to fund SS and MC. Establish a commission with a term to identify and cut MC waste. Have surtax to pay for all military costs ex USA ie korea, nato, iraq..
problems solved!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   05/15/11 22:07

He had me going until he whiffed on entitlements.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact