Alea iacta est. That’s what Julius Caesar proclaimed as he crossed the Rubicon River in 49 B.C. It means, “The die is cast.” By crossing the Rubicon with his army — against Roman law — Caesar guaranteed a head-on conflict with the overconfident Roman ruler Pompey. Outnumbered, Caesar was presented with the choice: win or die.
The recent special election in the 26th congressional district of New York was a political Rubicon. The Democrat, Kathy Hochul, ran against the Republican budget, specifically Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan to save Medicare by turning it into a voucher program starting 10 years from now (excluding all current beneficiaries).
Advertisement
The Republican, Jane Corwin, said she supported the plan and then spent much of the campaign defending it with all of the verbal dexterity of a contestant in a cracker-eating competition.
It’s difficult to exaggerate the gloating and glee from Democrats about their triumph. Their takeaway: Democrats can win if they demonize the Ryan plan and run ads (or allow third-party groups to run them) showing old ladies being flung from cliffs like Spartan infants.
There is certainly good reason to believe that Hochul’s so-called “Medi-scare” tactics made the difference. It was the top issue for nearly a quarter of voters. And while most of them may well have voted Democratic anyway, the simple fact is that Hochul won a single-issue campaign in a district that shouldn’t have elected a Democrat at all.
Republicans console themselves by noting that she won with only 47 percent of the vote, and a Democratic gadfly who bought the Tea Party label garnered 9 percent of the vote. Meanwhile, Corwin simply wasn’t a very strong candidate. Karl Rove points out in the Wall Street Journal that Hochul received merely one more percentage point than Barack Obama did when he lost the district in 2008.
Even Paul Ryan says that aside from the Democrats’ lies and distortions about his plan, Hochul’s victory “shows that a Democrat running as a Tea Party candidate dumping a couple million dollars in the race is going to have an effect.”
Fine, fine. For the sake of argument, let’s stipulate that’s all true. So what?
The simple fact is that the Democrats have their battle plan. It’s going to be Medi-scare every day in every way for the next 17 months. They are on autopilot. They are committed. Their die is cast. They have crossed their Rubicon. They have no desire to defend Obamacare, high gas prices, high unemployment, and a third Middle East war. They want — no, need — to be on offense because they have so much they cannot defend.
The question now is, “What are Republicans going to do about it?” Are they going to play the role of Pompey, the dissolute leader who didn’t want to fight? Or will they don Caesarian robes and join the battle head-on because they know they have nowhere to retreat? That is the political choice for the GOP: Win or die.
There’s an entirely plausible case to be made that the GOP bravely blundered in passing the Ryan budget. I don’t agree with that argument. But again, so what?
A surefire way for that claim to be proven true is for Republicans to start hemming and hawing and apologizing for what they’ve done. Look, the House of Representatives passed it with a near-unanimous vote among Republicans. Forty Senate Republicans voted for it as well. Republicans can’t run from that, so they shouldn’t try.
The one advantage the outnumbered Caesar had was that he and his battle-tested forces understood that there was only one solution to their plight: victory.
The battle-tested Republicans have the same suite of options. And they are battle-tested. Last November, they won sweeping victories in the midterm elections. How? By focusing first and foremost on the Democrats’ failures.
For instance, the Democrats have a plan too. It’s the Status Quo-Plus. It involves letting Medicare continue to spiral out of control, consuming our budget until it becomes necessary for an unelected chamber of health-care bureaucrats to impose draconian cuts. Actually, Democrats have two plans. That was the Obama plan. There’s also the Harry Reid plan, which involves lawlessly refusing to pass a budget for close to 800 days.
The GOP does need to be more optimistic and pro-growth. It can’t just sell reality-based pain when the opposition is selling the cheap lies of deceit.
But more than anything, Republicans need to realize that the die has been cast. All that is left for them is to decide whether they will play the role of Pompey or of Caesar.
— Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. You can write to him by e-mail at JonahsColumn@aol.com, or via Twitter @JonahNRO. (C) 2011 Tribune Media Services, Inc.
I prefer the alternate reading of Caesar's famous line: "Let the dice fly." I believe it was a reference to Menander. It portrays Caesar not as a fatalist, but as a gambler, rolling the dice on the future of Rome and liking his chances.
Compare "Carthago delenda est," or Carthage [must be] destroyed. "est" as an emphasis.
Any articulate Conservative that can speak on the differences & the American dream and just laugh at their opponents lies and call them out on them will win going away. Give the Leftist a good scare...Organize a march against the UN and see how many people show up!
GOP candidates have the tools to win both the Senate and the White House if they have the courage to do what it takes: explain their positions vigorously. If they choose the McCain path, accepting the media's preferred method of campaigning and debating, they will lose.
Conservatives have an admirable weakness in a desire to answer questions as completely, directly and factually as possible. In a media environment that is hostile, the premise of the questions about Ryan's plan presuppose failings, willfully make false statements and bend facts.
We know we exist in this reality, so we need a deliberate communication strategy that recognizes that.
In accepting the premise and responding to such questions, two things happen. The respondent must try to explain why the question is wrong, as well as defend the plan and explain what is right about it. This is impossible in a 15 second spot, and we've seen the results.
I'm tired of my elected spokespeople continually falling into this trap. We need to control the narrative and reject the false premise.
Where are all the high paid communications experts? Why is this such an easy strategy for the Democrats?
This is incredible. Two NRO columns in 24 hours on Republicans' need to learn to use this orifice under their nose for something more than hemming and hawing and articulating what great friends they consider Democrats to be. Keep it up and don't let up until they start doing it. They fate of a nation depends on their doing it.
Joe Cor--ya think?? There should be two columns on NRO every day touching on this subject and two dozen comments with suggestions. Today I will merely repeat: Who was Paul Ryan's speechwriter for his comments on March 31, 2010 in Oklahoma?
The GOP needs to find its inner "Lee Atwater". Boehnner, Ryan, McConnel need to use every legal method both moral and immoral to fight the Dems at thier own game.
And for that reason I have lost all hope. And look for the likes of Dick Lugar to play to role of Brutus.
Agreed. Trouble is, the GOP dies. The fight will not be about the best way to manage the costs (a step down in the first place from how much should government share responsibility for our health care), but about why that picture of Grandma going off the cliff in her wheelchair is a fair depiction of the GOP plan. The Dems have defined the question in a way that there is no downside for them. And, to top it all off, all of the GOP has crackers in their mouth.
As a conservative, I spend half my time doing the facepalm whenever a Republican politician is speaking. We're not called the Stupid Party for nothing.
We need more media savvy people. And people who can play the Democrat's game.
That insurance companies have no interest in providing decent health care to sick 80-year olds was proven years ago. That's why Medicare came into existence. It's also why no other civilized country in the world, despite having budgetary problems as serious as ours, has a conservative political party advocating anything like the Republican proposal. (At least, I don't think so. Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
You must be watching too much MSNBC and CNN...please stop calling it a "voucher program". That's the lazy left's way of describing it. It is not, strictly speaking, a voucher program.
A voucher program is where the government would hand you a coupon and tell you, "ok son, now go out there and git yo'self some insurance!"
Ryan's premium support plan would present you a choice of pre-screened insurance options with total annual costs clearly defined and tell you what the government is willing to pay on your behalf. It is then up to your to pick a plan and an out-of-pocket cost that fits your needs/finances/etc. Mechanism would be in place to assist you if you were poor.
The two are technically different and, in this case, semantics does matter. I'm not aware of any polling (although I'm sure the DNC ran focus groups on this), but I bet if you get a bunch of people together and ask them if they like a "voucher" system or a premium support system, I'm sure "voucher" is a big loser...
Republicans need to take a look at Ryan. After the vote in NY-26 he was all over the place (YouTube, that budget symposium with Clinton, Special Report, Morning Joe, etc) and he was hitting it out of the park where ever he went.
He has the right offensive plan which is to show that he is LEADING by putting ideas on the table while Harry and Barack dither and do nothing. The GOP needs to continue to hammer away at the Democrats lack of leadership and idea. Jeff Sessions did the right thing by withholding unanimous consent on the decision to adjourn leaving Harry Reid no option but to hold pro-forma legislative sessions next week so he wouldn't have to vote himself a vacation.
The GOP needs to double-down on that strategy and force the Dems to give a pint of blood (oops, that's not a "nice" analogy!!) for everything they want to vote on until they start to lead. Refuse unanimous consent until they put forth a budget, etc...this will expose the Democrats for what they are.
If the GOP does not present the case that Medicare and SSI are going broke, that the Treasury's borrowing courts fiscal disaster, that both entitlement programs are intergenerational Ponzi schemes stealing from our children and grandchildren, and that if something radical is not done our government will collapse. If they continue on with verbal dexterity of cracker eaters, they deserve every "throw Grandma off a cliff" ad they can expect to see. Heck, even Bill Clinton acknowledges the Dems have no plan beyond the scare tactics and the untenable status quo.
But as others have said, when your leaders coonsist of "split the difference" imbeciles like Lindsey Graham and Dick Lugar, we're probably screwed. These idiots look at Paul Ryan and Rand Paul and worry they'll never get another free steak at the Palm.Thse old dogs are an embarrassment who stand for nothing principled, nor nothing beyond themselves.
That's all well and good - perhaps she lost 2-5 percentage points due to the mediscare tactics. And yes, Republicans should develop some strategy to deal with that. That is no surprise.
A much bigger problem exists. The Dems are chortling about the unpopularity of the Republican's stance on Medicare. What they are taking note of is what happens when you get a fake tea party candidate involved. I am much more worried about this aspect of that race.
Davis knew he wasn't going to win. More importantly he was not exactly a Liberal democrat. He's got some populist positions on trade that can find themselves at home within the tea party movement. This could be an achilles heel within the tea party. Measures should be taken where possible to avoid deceptive candidates under the tea party label. Grass roots are fine but they can be corrupted rather easily because they have no leader (see Facebook revolution in Egypt).