Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Obama’s Costly Gulf Moratorium
His energy policy is doing serious harm.

By Jim Adams


Archive Latest RSS Send
Text  

Just as America marked the first anniversary of President Obama’s blanket moratorium on all deepwater oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico, we learned exactly how his administration manipulated its regulators to keep oil drilling idle for more than a year.

For months, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar used the Deepwater Horizon tragedy as the single excuse for his agency’s failure to issue permits for new oil exploration in the Gulf. But a new House Oversight and Government Reform Committee report tells a different story: It’s all about political will.

Advertisement

Ignoring key evidence and input from hundreds of energy-exploration experts, Salazar suspended drilling on 33 deepwater wells and banned new drilling plans in the Gulf of Mexico. He claimed that the moratorium had the backing of a panel of experts that the Obama administration had put together — but the House committee’s report points to an “important White House official [who] changed the safety report [and] created the misleading appearance of scientific peer review.”

The committee’s report also noted the administration’s reckless disregard for the 400,000 Gulf Coast workers either directly or indirectly employed by the oil and gas industry. Under Secretary of Commerce Rebecca Blank testified that the administration never once studied the economic impact the moratorium would have on the Gulf Coast economy and on oil production.

Are we really expected to believe that the administration’s ongoing de facto moratorium on oil exploration in the Gulf is owing entirely to one drilling-rig accident — one out of 42,000 drill-rig operations in the last 60 years? Of course not. Prohibiting all drilling and exploratory activities is akin to banning all airplanes because of one crash.

Clearly, the president hopes that banning oil exploration in the Gulf will decrease America’s energy demand by making gas more expensive. But it’s not working out that way.

The administration’s de facto moratorium on oil exploration in the Gulf has resulted in a complete reversal from where we were one year ago: Domestic production was then at an all-time high for the sixth year in a row; U.S. reliance on the Middle East was decreasing as oil imports from the region declined to less than 18 percent; and Americans were paying $2.86 per gallon.

The Obama-Salazar “let them drive hybrids” mentality is indicative of the disconnect between the White House and the public. There are 250 million cars in this country that don’t run on electricity from solar or wind; they run on oil. And because this president won’t let us drill for oil in the Gulf, there’s less of it — and American drivers are paying the price at the pump.

Safety is no longer an issue. Oil-rig operators have already demonstrated that they can contain a BP-sized blowout. Yet the administration has issued just one permit to drill in the Gulf of Mexico in the last 12 months. And one year later, the Interior Department is still mulling applications to resume previously approved, previously permitted, and previously drilled wells.

As gas prices skyrocketed, the president feigned concessions by reopening Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserves (NPR-A) to lease sales . . . that no one wants. The Bureau of Land Management offered 1.8 million acres last year and received bids on just 28,444 acres.

As if that weren’t enough, the president then said he would create a new team to expedite permits for approved drilling plans in the NPR-A — not the Gulf of Mexico, not for today’s Gulf lease holders, and not for last year’s previously approved and permitted wells.

If the president truly wants to cut our dependence on foreign oil, reduce gas prices, and create jobs, he could direct Interior Secretary Salazar to clear the backlog of oil-exploration permit applications in the Gulf and expedite plans going forward.

But the president doesn’t want that. And that’s the point.

— Jim Adams is president and CEO of the Offshore Marine Service Association, which represents the owners and operators of U.S.-flag offshore-service vessels and the shipyards and other businesses that support that industry.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST

Lowry: Unleash Biden!



COMMENTS   3

EXPAND  

Jeremiah
   06/08/11 12:31

I am in the midst of a walking pilgrimage across America right now. For the last month and a half I have been in Southern Louisiana, the heart of the Gulf Oil region. Every town I go through I meet good people who made a good living doing the hard work of producing oil for this country. They know very well that it is not market forces that have put them out of work - or forced them to get 'burger-flipping' jobs when gas is at $4 a gallon and rising. It is their own government which has crushed their livelihoods, increased the price of gas for everyone, and set the entire economy on a crash course with a reality that is not the least deceived by the moonbeams and fairy dust of "green" jobs. Our national government has become the sworn enemy of ordinary people - and the people know it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   06/08/11 17:37

Spent $55 at ARCO - it was noon and it was a zoo. Looking around, I noted most vehicles required far more gas than my little pickup.

I know where the fuel is flowing into ... but where is the money flowing out to?

That 40% is going to OPEC while we've got our own supply is total insanity!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Consumer
   06/19/11 22:02

What reason would Obama have for demanding the increase of energy cost other than to wreak our economy? The left says he is sooo smart, so he must be doing it on purpose. Creating a manufactured shortage is inexcusable and un-American. We need to find candidates that will make energy their platform! Look around you right now. Everything you see uses energy or takes some form of energy to get from point a to b. Even with the large field of candidates the GOP has, I'm still not hearing enough about energy independence, a serious plan!!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact