The Undefeated is the story of Sarah Palin’s life in politics, refracted through the prism of Joseph Campbell’s “hero’s journey.”
The documentary film’s closing image is Palin at an April 17 Tea Party rally in Wisconsin, declaring, “President Obama, game on!” The film is tentatively scheduled to have its first releases in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada, all key primary states. Obviously, a Palin presidential campaign is official only when word comes from Palin herself. But this stirring, surprisingly artistic, and narrative-driven film will seem strangely incomplete without one.
Advertisement
Shortly after the 2010 midterms, Rebecca Mansour and Tim Crawford of SarahPAC approached Stephen Bannon, creator of the documentary Fire in the Heartland, about doing a 30-minute short about Palin. He replied that the proposed concept and format didn’t interest him, but that he did have his own vision for a full-length documentary film, one he was willing to finance himself. His only request for Palin’s PAC was help in getting access to some key figures from the early days of her career in Alaska. Palin herself had no editorial control of the film, and in fact first watched a cut only two weeks ago. Last week, on Greta Van Susteren’s show, Palin declared she was “blown away” by the film.
Before the screening, Bannon mentioned that I and other political reporters were about to watch the “X-rated version,” as opposed to a “XXX-rated version” that he envisions being released on DVD someday. Within the first four minutes, the reason for that cryptic remark was clear, and the X rating is well deserved: The worst sneers, insults, and furious denunciations from Palin’s enemies are presented in their original language, sans any bleeps. (A version in theaters is likely to bleep out the worst ones.) The F word and the C word make multiple appearances. What’s remarkable is that the acidic comments from comedians such as David Letterman, Joan Rivers, Rosie O’Donnell, and Tracey Morgan aren’t really jokes. There’s no punch line per se; calling Palin “slutty” or a “whore,” or offering some other (usually sexual) insult, apparently is supposed to be the punch line.
“I believe you have to grab the audience in the beginning,” Bannon says. Perhaps he’s understated his grab.
The Undefeated skips through most of Palin’s early life with a series of family photos and home movies. Using Palin’s voice from the audiobook version of Going Rogue, Bannon begins his narrative with the Exxon Valdez disaster, and we note that in the late 1980s, Palin was a mom-to-be working on her husband’s commercial-fishing vessel, witnessing the carnage of unemployment, foreclosures, alcoholism, divorces, and suicides unleashed by the catastrophe and its aftermath. It is as difficult to picture young Palin as a future national political leader as to imagine an awkward, biracial teen in Punahou School in Honolulu the late 1970s winning the presidency.
By far, the most eye-opening part of the film — and no doubt, most useful to the presidential hopes of Palin — is the second act, detailing Palin’s time as Alaska’s governor. Oil companies are the relentless villain of Alaskan politics; in retrospect it seems bizarre that the woman most hated by modern liberals spent so much of her career fighting tooth and nail with oil-company executives. During this whole stretch, there isn’t a partisan note. Alaskan politics is painted as a rigged game benefiting the politically powerful and influential with the citizenry getting the short end of the stick, time and again — until Palin appears on the scene.
“I’ve had people tell me it’s too long, you’ve got to shorten it and dumb it down, but I believe that if you expect more of your audience, they’ll rise to the material,” Bannon says. “It’s like a Harvard Business School case study. I would put her accomplishments in those most important 18 months up against the most productive 18 months of any other governor of the 20th century or 21st century. And even though I never mention it in the film, in the middle of all that, she had a baby.”
Bannon’s style is characterized by rapid editing; he notes that the film includes three times as many images and cuts as would a comparable PBS documentary. His illustrative choices are comical (while an Alaskan official discusses intense legal fights with the oil companies, we see two men in suits, one concealing a knife behind his back, the other a gun), vivid (war footage), and sometimes unnerving (when talking about how the Left sought to drive Palin out of public life, we see sand being shoveled on a corpse).
Mr. Geraghty, thanks for what seems to be a straight up critique of the film. Other reviews have varied from a bad case of cheerleading to worse case of envy from liberals.
One word of caution: Watch your back around Katrina Trinko. ;-)
Well I am not convinced to vote for Palin in the primaries assuming she is running but you have convinced me to see the film sounds very interesting. Thanks for the review.
The Republican presidential nomnation belongs to Sarah Palin, if and when she wants it. Every potential candidate needs to factor that into their thinking.
Can she win? Nixon didn't in 1960. Reagan didn't in 1968 and 1976. Bush the Elder didn't in 1980. Dole and McCain didn't on multiple attempts.
Where exactly Palin fits in here will be up to history.
Now if the conservative pundits can just get out of the way and allow this woman to sink or swim on her own and stop saying she is unelectable, that would be a treat.
So far Palin grabs the biggest crowds everywhere and Obama is sometimes reduced to papering the house when he speaks.
She may choose not to run. If that's is her decision, fine.
But if she runs, for once I hope the right is quiet if they can't say anything nice. Let the left go ballistic. It would be fun to have her run just to watch their apoplexy.
The best kind of review, one that makes you impatient to see the film.
Perhaps the film will change my mind, but I think Palin would better serve as chairman of the Republican National Committee. If she could clean out the Republican oligarchs the way she cleaned out the Alaskan Good Ol' Boy network...
The important question is will this change anyone's mind? I doubt it. Like most things that Former Half-Term Governor Palin does, the SarahCult will celebrate endlessly. They pronounce it the greatest political documentary of all time, a stunning vindication of Palin's political career, and a paean to her many accomplishments as governor. Those of us who don't like it, will be called elitist, establishment RINOs, and worse.
I suspect the rest of us will yawn. We've heard it all before. But I do remember fondly when Palin mocked Obama for those faux Greek columns at his 2008 convention speech. I liked her more back then. I'm just sad that her entire schtick these days is just her own version of those big foam columns.
I don't think that's fair re. Palin. I'm not a huge fan of hers for the GOP nomination right now (I am pretty enthused about Herman Cain) BUT - Obama signed off on those Greek columns. Palin didn't make or edit this movie. And she actually DOES have a record of accomplishment.
Somewhere between 2008 and 2011 I jumped off the Palin bandwagon. It probably had to do with her increasingly cult-like followers. If she somehow manages to get the nomination in 2012, I will still have to hold my nose while voting for her.
Jim your review is very good. However, I have to admit I'm waiting for some one not in love and adoration of Palin to tell me if they like the documentary. Tell me if they think it is worth one's time and money to see.
So far the reviews I read from outside fandom have been very factual, but not very helpful. I want one of those cheesy thumbs up or thumbs down, or one out of four stars kind of reviews.
I guess I will have to wait until it is released and lazy film critics get a hold of it. They will cut to the chase.
@hrh I do follow reviews, but in the end it does not matter that much for what I see. I don't have a lot of time or money. I think I've only gone to one movie since my kids were born. I took my DD to see Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel.
I did write that I liked Jim's review, but I'm hoping for one of those lazy reviews. I don't have a lot of time, but hey kids really don't stay young that long.
Of course, with Palin I don't expect unbiased, I was hoping for neutral. Like it is worth your time and money.
When it comes to reviewers I've found if you find one who matches your tastes, it saves you both time and money. Certainly there are more movies made then I will ever be willing to go out and see, so why not help sort by looking at the opinions of someone paid to wade through noise.
In case your wondering how I could possibly have an informed opinion on this matter, I used to go to lots of movies pre-motherhood. Now I love my Netflix.
On the otherhand as a parent and an Aunt I live by reviews, I like to know what to expect before exposing kiddos to films, I hate to be blindsided. In this culture you have to live your own values. My kids, my friends kids, and my nephews are going to be exposed to many things in life that I disapprove of but they will not be exposed to them by me.
Pretty long winded, but bottom line I think of reviews as a tool, and I like to read them about books, movies, and products.
@ Dave in Georgia. I don't think that republicans have mass suicide tendencies. There is a lot at stake this time to choose somebody that will never win the national election. This is not Nevada or Delaware, it is the national election.
MikeB, you mean when she paid her own way through college and took semesters off to earn more money and entered beauty pageants for the scholarship money and persevered to get her BS in Journalism with a minor in Political Science?
You mean that part of the story?
Perhaps you prefer Prez Obama's affirmative action, foreign scholarship, don't-pay-a-cent-for-your-own-education version of getting a degree?