‘There are always going to be bumps on the road to recovery,’’ President Obama said at a Jeep plant in Toledo the other day. “We’re going to pass through some rough terrain that even a Wrangler would have a tough time with.’’ His audience booed. They’re un-fire-able union members with lavish benefits, and even they weary of the glib lines from his twelve-year-old speechwriters.
We’re not on the road to recovery. You can’t get there from here, as they say. Obama was in Toledo to “celebrate” the sale of the government’s remaining stake in Chrysler to Fiat. That’s “Fiat” as in the Italian car manufacturer rather than “an authoritative or arbitrary decree (from the Latin ‘let it be done’),” which would be almost too perfect a name for an Obamafied automobile. The Treasury crowed that Fiat had agreed to pay a whopping $560 million for the government’s Chrysler shares.
Advertisement
Wow! 560 million smackeroos! If you laid them out end to end, they’re equivalent to what the federal government borrows every three hours. That’s some windfall! In the time it takes to fly Obama to Toledo to boast about it, he’d already blown through the Italians’ check. But who knows? If every business in the U.S. were to be nationalized and sold to foreigners to cover another three hours’ worth of debt, this summer’s “Recovery Summer” would be going even more gangbusters. I’d ask one of Obama’s egghead economists to explain it to you simpletons, but unfortunately they’ve all resigned and returned to cozy sinecures in academia. The latest is chief economic adviser Austan Goolsbee, the genius who in 2007, just before the subprime hit the fan, wrote in the New York Times that this exciting new form of home “ownership” was an “innovation” that had “opened doors to the excluded” and was part of an “incredible flowering of new types of home loans.”
Where have all the flowers gone? Not to worry. By now, some organization of which you’re a member has already booked Professor Goolsbee to give an after-dinner speech at your annual meeting where you’ll be privileged to get a glimpse of his boundless expertise for a mere six-figure speaking fee.
“I’m not concerned about a double-dip recession,” Obama said last week. Nor would I be if I had government housing, a car and driver, and a social secretary for the missus. But I wonder if it’s such a smart idea to let one’s breezy insouciance out of the bag when you’re giving a press conference. In May the U.S. economy added just 54,000 jobs. For the purposes of comparison, that same month over 100,000 new immigrants arrived in America.
So what kind of jobs were those 54,000? Economics professorships at the University of Berkeley? Non-executive directorships at Goldman Sachs? That sort of thing? No, according to an analysis by Morgan Stanley, half the new jobs created were at McDonald’s. That’s amazing. Not the Mickey D supersized hiring spree, but the fact that there’s fellows at Morgan Stanley making a bazillion dollars a year analyzing fluctuations in minimal-skill fast-food service-job hiring trends. What a great country! For as long as it lasts. Which is probably until some new regulatory agency starts enforcing Michelle Obama’s dietary admonitions.
Until then, relax. That bump in the road is just a quarter-pounder with cheese that fell off the counter on the drive-thru lane to recovery. Like every other blessing, we owe the Big MacConomy to the wisdom of Good King Barack. “This plant indirectly supports hundreds of other jobs right here in Toledo,” Obama told the workers at Chrysler. “After all, without you, who’d eat at Chet’s or Inky’s or Rudy’s? . . . Manufacturers from Michigan to Massachusetts are looking for new engineers to build advanced batteries for American-made electric cars. And obviously, Chet’s and Inky’s and Zinger’s, they’ll all have your business for some time to come.”
A couple of days later, Chet’s announced it was closing after nine decades. “It was the economy and the smoking ban that hurt us more than anything,” said the owner. But maybe he can retrain and re-open it as a community-organizer grantwriting-application center. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the median period of unemployment is now nine months — the longest it’s been since they’ve been tracking the numbers. Long-term unemployment is worse than in the Depression. Life goes slowly waiting for a fast-food job to open up.
This is Main Street, Obamaville: All bumps, no road. But shimmering on the distant horizon, beyond the shuttered diner and the foreclosed homes, is a state-of-the-art electric car, the new Fiat Mirage, that should be wheeling into town in a half-decade or so provided it can find somewhere to charge. “We will be able to look back and tell our children,” declared King Barack the Modest of his own candidacy in 2008, “this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow.” Great news for the oceans! Meanwhile, back on dry land, a quarter of American mortgages are “underwater” — that’s to say, the home “owners” owe more than the joint is worth. In Harry Reid’s Nevada, it’s 63 percent. Perhaps Obama’s Aquatic Bodies Water-Level Regulatory Authority, no doubt headed by Jamie Gorelick or Franklin Raines or some other Democrat worthy, could have its jurisdiction extended to the Nevada desert.
Genius. Pure unadulterated genius.
Here's how a liberal, Rachel Maddow, say, would respond to it:
"The usual acerbic Mark Steyn with his large hyperbolic language does more to confuse than reveal the truth. This is what passes for cleverness. Talk big, use funny metaphors and believe that you are clearing things up when instead you are doing the opposite. That's right folks. All Mark Steyn can do is be funny. Now if he could only make sense."
There would be no rebuttal, no arguing with the facts or logic here. Just a put down and then smug satisfaction. That's all the left has now. They are not witty. They just say dangerous things and smirk and think they are witty.
Mark Steyn, I would say save us and run for President, but then there would be no more great columns like this. Mr. Steyn, are a genius.
Thank you for this column.
The worst part is that the administration and the Democratic Party behind it have no intention of changing course, much less reversing course. I think people are as outraged as Steyn says they should be. Are their representatives in the opposition?
Only Mr Steyn can absorb the absurdity of our every day news and present it back to us in such a witty way that you don't know whether to laugh or cry. Great column again.
Sometimes the obvious is just too painfully obvious. An adjunct president with a fierce following is a national Jim Jones with a larger batch of Kool-Aid.
(@freedom, the hypothetical Maddow exactly describes Obama's teleprompter.)
The American Dream, 2011: You pay four bucks a gallon to commute between your McJob and your underwater housing to prop up a spendaholic, grabafeelic, paramilitarized bureaucracy-without-end bankrupting your future at the rate of a fifth of a billion dollars every hour.
That's what we hammer home from now. And watch Obama's weakness reveal his true personality in the debates.
I was heading out to the office and now I'm more ready than ever and smiling. That was the best, most entertaining summary of the situation I have ever heard. Let's make it our goal to spread the message. This guy has nothing, knows nothing, does nothing (good) While King Barry is at Camp David I'm at work but, later I'll be working to get him out
Thanks Mark!
""I’m not concerned about a double-dip recession," Obama said last week. Nor would I be if I had government housing, a car and driver, and a social secretary for the missus."
And don't forget the guaranteed lifetime pension paid for by those who's lives he's also obviously "not concerned about".
Longplay,
Not to mention that he gets to go to England with a party of 500 people, clothing, transportation, several private physicians, etc, and we get to pay for all of that.
Why exactly is an Italian company going to locate unionized jobs in the US? And why are they going to build a product that will be too expensive for most and have no market demand?Nothing The One has said that would allow any foreign or American company to choose to lose money. More proof Obama has no idea how business nor the economy work.
Only a non-American citizen like brilliant Mark Steyn can really describe the Obamanation that we're in, creating much laughter, remorse, and, of course, tears. Every Obama voter should be compelled to read this column before stepping into a voting booth again!
Top line - Barack H. Obama
Second Line - Stokely Carmichael
President Obama has been focused like a laser on jobs since Recovery Spring 2009 - Green Shoots ring a bell.
Recovery Summer is tan, rested and ready to be renewed as Recovery Summer 2011 - Keep up the good work Joe - Beware of Joe.
You know, if the Department of Education did something useful--like, say, working on getting American kids up to speed on some subject other than "self-esteem building"--I'd be all for it. But as our education has gone downhill in all the years we've had a DoE, I can't see how it justifies itself.
On the other hand, that would be a whole lot of people joining the unemployment lines, which are already pretty swollen.
Were there any competing offers for the shares sold to Fiat?
Bah. I've had enough Eeyorism, and it's only early morning. What do we propose doing--ourselves, not through the government--to fix this? I don't have money, but I'm willing to roll up my sleeves if someone has a good plan.
Your writing is one of the highlights of my week.
You consistently mix humor, wit, message, and passion (without being glib).
"Scout, stand up. Your father's passing."
I'm standing. Well done, sir.
I suspect Comrade Obama's intention is to "drown" America.
Consider the words of the man Comrade Obama hired as his top adviser on science and technology, John P. Holdren:
“A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to DE-DEVELOP the United States. . . . Resources and energy must be diverted from frivolous and wasteful uses in overdeveloped countries to filling the genuine needs of underdeveloped countries. This effort must be largely political.”
This is what Comrade Obama meant when he mentioned "redistribution of wealth".