Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Obama’s Declaration of Dependence
The self-reliant citizenry is history.

By Mark Steyn


About Author Archive Latest RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

Dozens of countries have “Independence Days.” November 25th, for example: Independence Day in Suriname. In that instance as in most others, the designation signifies nothing more than transfer of de jure sovereignty and de facto operational control from a distant European capital to a more local regime. 1975 in Suriname’s case. They had the first military coup seven years later.

But in America “Independence” seemed as much a statement about the character of a people as a designation of jurisdictional status. The first Americans were British subjects who had outgrown a British king as benign and enlightened as any ruler on the planet. They demanded “independence” not from foreign rulers of another ethnicity but from their own compatriots with whom they had a disagreement about the nature of government. Long before the Revolutionary War, small New England townships governed themselves to a degree no old England towns did. “Independence” is not about the replacement of a king in London with a president in Washington but about the republican virtues of a self-reliant citizenry free to exploit its own potential.

Advertisement

Please, no snickering. The self-reliant citizen? In the damning formulation of contemporary American vernacular, he’s history — as in over and done with, fuhgeddabouttim. What’s left of that founding vision on this less than Glorious Fourth of July 2011 in the Brokest Nation in History? “You go talk to your constituents,” President Obama taunted Republicans on Wednesday, “and ask them, are they willing to compromise their kids’ safety so that some corporate-jet owner continues to get a tax break?”

In the Republic of Brokistan, that’s the choice, is it? Give me safe kids or give me corporate jets! No corporate aviation without safe kiddification! In his bizarre press conference on Wednesday, Obama made no fewer than six references to corporate-jet owners. Just for the record, the tax break for corporate jets was part of the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009” — i.e., the stimulus. The Obama stimulus. The Obama-Pelosi-Reid stimulus. The Obama-Pelosi-Reid-Democratic-party stimulus that every single Republican House member and all but three Republican senators voted against. The Obama–Corporate Jet stimulus that some guy called Obama ostentatiously signed into law in Denver after jetting in to host an “economic forum.”

Charles Krauthammer did the math. If you eliminate the Obama-Pelosi-Reid Corporate Jet Tax Break, you would save so much dough that, after 5,000 years, you would have clawed back enough money to cover one year of Obama’s debt. Five thousand years is the year 7011. Boy, our kids’ll really be safe by then. I see some leftie at MSNBC has just been suspended for characterizing the president’s performance on Wednesday as that of a demotic synonym for the male reproductive organ. So I shall be more circumspect and say only that even being a hollow unprincipled demagogue requires a certain lightness of touch Obama can’t seem to find.

Speaking of corporate jets, did the president fly commercial to Denver? Oh, but that’s different! He’s in “public service.” A couple of weeks before he flew Air Force One to Denver, he flew Air Force One to Williamsburg, Va. From the White House (well, via Andrews Air Force Base). That’s 150 miles, a 30-minute flight. He took a 747, a wide-bodied jet designed to carry 500 people to the other side of the planet, for a puddle-jump across the Potomac.

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Will Fear Decide Texas Senate Race?

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST



COMMENTS   69

EXPAND  

Eileen Bellacosa
   07/02/11 08:06

"The self-reliant citizen? In the damning formulation of contemporary American vernacular, he’s history — as in over and done with, fuhgeddabouttim."

Come on Mark. What about us Tea Party people?
It ain't over yet. Not with us around. That is what we are all about...the self-reliant citizenry that wants limited government and believes in the first principles of this republic. We are here and we are watching.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/02/11 08:12

If even the lefties on MSNBC are growing weary of Obama's straw man rhetoric and campaign speechifying masquarading as leadership, I can see the fat lady is in full makeup and is moving toward the stage.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Lamprey Wrangler
   07/02/11 08:45

But will she be singing for the "O",...or for us?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Don't Diggit
   07/02/11 11:58

Let's hope the fat lady is singing "Street Fightin' Man."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Kevin B
   07/03/11 08:53

I give Obama about five and a half more years as President, tops.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Traveller
   07/02/11 09:22

We are not a constituent. We are highly displeased with Barry, Our servant. We will not renew his contract.

Ask yourselves first: who is the sovereign from whom all authority comes? We are, by the grace of the Creator.

Signed and Sealed by Our Hand,

THE PEOPLE of the United States

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/02/11 09:25

Part of the stimulus?
Now that is funny!

That statement along with the admission that those shovel ready jobs weren't as shovel ready as we thought may be as close to an acknowledgement that the stimulus failed.

I truly hope one of our contenders for the 2012 nominee (McCotter maybe?) brings these types of discrepencies to the debate. Bring the discussion back to the Liberal spending on the stimulus, QE2, and ObamaCare; counter the Left's attack on Republican ideas immediately and discuss foreign policy failures.
Silence on these topics only implies agreement.

Lazy America needs to know what ObamaCare, the current LAW of the land, does to senior's Medicare. What cessation of funding ObamaCare and the redirection of those funds to reduce our debt would mean for sustaining our Senior's Social Security that Obama treacherously states will stop should we not allow our borrowing to continue.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/02/11 09:42

Speaking of cartoon physics, I remember another cartoon in which, as the noon whistle blew, characters falling from a height were able to stop in mid-descent, take out their lunchboxes and eat as they sat on thin air. Don't remember if they worked for the Acme Company.

Priceless zingers as usual, Mark. Thanks for making my day.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/02/11 09:47

Happy 4th of July to Americans in all 57 states... Be thankful, Obama wants to preserve the dream of a fine American education where your kids have the opportunity to go to Harvard, home of the ground-breaking study that determined, in statistical minutiae, the dangers of 4th of July celebrations turning your children into right-wingers.... Yes, as we cling to our guns and religion, we should feel very proud that this vanguard of intellectually-superior nabobs toils tirelessly to dismantle every last vestige of restrained governance enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. I can hardly contain my optimism about America's future.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DOOM161
   07/02/11 10:03

Speaking of debt: How's his progress on reigning in the runaway Bush deficit?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Thomas_L......
   07/02/11 11:30

Well, Doomy, he's adding to it as fast as humanly possible. If making things even worse is your agenda, Yes We Can.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
chuck s
   07/02/11 11:38

Don't you know by now that it's TRIPLE DOWN WITH OBAMA?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   07/02/11 12:27

He can't tell and neither can we - Obama has run so far past it so fast we cannot even see it anymore.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   07/02/11 12:29

He can't tell and neither can we - Obama has run so far past it so fast we cannot even see it anymore.

(I apologize for the doule post, but I was trying to reply here not up above.)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   07/02/11 12:31
steve bennett
   07/02/11 17:27

God I hope for the sake of the republic you are not serious.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/04/11 16:17

Well, didn't you know? He's tripled it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/02/11 10:07

obama is becoming a cartoon character for Patriotic Americans who love this Country. But the narcissist in chief really still believes he doing a great job....you know "Afganistan, Greece, doin Bin Laden".

After reading Mark's excellent article that could be a cartoon script and make you giggle during more steady times, I have a sinking feeling in my gut.

If the cartoonish president gets re-elected, like Bugs Bunny....yibidy, yibidy, yibidy, yibidy - that's all folks!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   07/02/11 10:11

Yeah, what Mark said goes double for me (both Steyn and Halperin)!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
CASpike
   07/02/11 10:36

Thanks Mark. Made my day!

Spike

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact