There was a headline last week: “Obama’s ratings plummet in Arab World.” (Article here.) Obama’s ratings are below those of George W. Bush, when that much maligned president left office.
I couldn’t help thinking of something that Obama said during the ’08 campaign: “I truly believe that the day I’m inaugurated . . . not only does the country look at itself differently, but the world looks at America differently.” The candidate went on, “The world will have confidence that I am listening to them, and that our future and our security is tied up with our ability to work with other countries in the world.”
Was Obama an egomaniac or a fool? The thing about egomania, it tends to make one look foolish, among other things.
Advertisement
An Associated Press report about Syria bears attention. Tens of thousands marched through Damascus shouting “We want freedom!” You know what I think these Arabs mean when they shout “We want freedom!”? Oddly enough, I think they mean “We want freedom!”
Haitham al-Maleh said something rather moving. He is an 80-year-old lawyer and dissident, who has spent time in Syrian jails. He recently left his country “out of fear for his life,” as the AP says.
Anyway, Maleh was in Turkey, attending a conference. And he said, “The regime” — meaning the Assad dictatorship — has “kidnapped the entire state, and we want it back.” He also called the dictatorship a “fascist regime.”
Which is exactly what it is.
Let me do some quoting of that report:
Saturday’s opposition conference in Turkey — called the National Salvation Conference — was attended by some 400 dissidents looking to form a unified opposition to Assad, whose family has ruled Syria for more than 40 years.
Some more:
Organizers had planned to hold a conference in Damascus in tandem with the Turkey meeting, but it was canceled after Friday’s bloodshed. The Local Coordination Committees said at least 14 people were killed near a hall where the conference was to be held.
Think of the bravery — the reckless, nearly mad bravery — of those people for getting anywhere near that hall.
One more excerpt, please:
Opposition figure Mashaal Tammo, addressing the conference by phone from Damascus, said Assad had lost his legitimacy to rule and called on him to step down.
In an emotional speech, he said the “the existence of the regime was no longer justified,” and called for a peaceful transition to a civil, pluralistic and democratic state.
These people are really not much different from you and me, in their desires and hopes. People will spend all their time — using their very last breath — to tell you it isn’t so. That these Arabs belong to a different species, really. You don’t have to believe them.
And, if you can — go discover for yourselves. Not Syria, just now. But the Middle East in general.
Ron Prosor was Israel’s ambassador to Britain for four years. Last month, on leaving, he published an article in the Telegraph. Here is part of what he said:
In Syria, Bashar al-Assad, the London-educated ophthalmologist with a blind spot for terror, is crushing the vision of unarmed protesters. Yet on the streets and campuses of Britain, Assad will never receive the level of vitriolic condemnation for slaughtering his citizens that Israel receives for defending ours.
You got that right, baby.
Frankly, I’m not really sure what “blind spot for terror” means. It seems to me that Assad relishes terror, eyes wide open. I imagine I just have a blind spot when it comes to Ambassador Prosor’s wording.
Oh, hang on, I get it — must be some joke with “ophthalmologist.” Still . . .
As President Obama shuffles the Dalai Lama in and out of the White House, with no media permitted, I think back to Obama’s predecessor, glorious in so many ways. Here was a president who had the spine to appear with the Tibetan leader in public. In fact, he traveled to the Capitol Rotunda, to see the Dalai Lama receive the Congressional Gold Medal.
Want to see W. and the lama grinning together, enjoying life together? Check it out.
Since I moved into my house 13 years ago, I've changed the lightbulb in the laundryroom twice. In order to "realize the energy savings" of the expensive new-fangled bulbs, I'llhave to live to be 162 years old.
And why is it that gay marriage is the only issue on which liberals even remember states' rights?
Utah is the only state that was hacked out of a larger territory called Deseret. The "marriage" issue then was one man, one woman plus. Practicing Polygamy got em wacked down to size. Why would the liberals want be the champion of gay mariage and advocate tax increases at the same time? If gay marriages are recognized as "legal" then they will be able to file jointly on the tax returns. If you want to legalize gay marriage use the interstate commerce clause to justify it.
‘Republican Party would be well advised to get the heck out of people’s bedrooms and let these things get decided by states.’
People were always talking about the money others “needed,” or didn’t need. “
So, libs desperately want us to be out of their bedrooms (I never wanted to be in there!), yet they feel perfectly at home in other peoples' finances. Such, I suppose, is their concept of freedom and individual liberty.
The situation in Syria places in stark relief the utter confusion among Obama and his foreign policy team. We march into Libya to PREEMPT a "humanitarian crisis", but yet the administration remains almost MUTE as to the actual crisis in Syria.
With what's at stake in Syria -- with what the fall of the Alawite regime would mean for the entire region (Lebanon's democracy, Tehran's hegemony, Hezbollah's terror) -- it is plum dumb that Obama will willingly forgo such a golden opportunity to advance our interests there.
But Libya? Where we have MAYBE a fraction of a percent of interest? Well, the US and NATO must "do something".
As irony twists, our failure in Libya to oust Quaddafi (which isn't even the mission) bolsters the likes of Assad.
So, two blown opportunities for the price of one. Perhaps Obama is a model of frugality, after all.
Obama suffers incurably from the grave misconception that Syria is "indispensable" to Middle East peace negotiations, even as it slaughters its own citizens.
An incurable naivete infects the judgment of his whole national security team.
Why, for example, are they not attempting to recruit Ankara toward Assad's ouster?
I envision Turkish "buffer zones" on the Syrian side of the border, much as Ankara set up in Kurdish Iraq under the pretext of avoiding a refugee crisis. This would hasten Assad's demise.
Obama envisions handshakes in the Rose Garden that will never blossom.
Re: libs remembering states' rights only for gay marriage, give it a little time and a couple more states, and I'm sure they'll forget. I don't think they like any part of DOMA.
But I think a quote from the quintessential conservative philosopher is apropos.
"The effect of liberty to individuals is that they may do what they please: we ought to see what it will please them to do, before we risk congratulations."
The dumbest thing about what Giuliani says is that he apparently *does* want the states to be the heck in people's bedrooms -- just not the Republican Party.
Actually, I feel safe in speaking for all here in saying we're more than happy to remain the heck far away from other people's bedrooms.
As usual, Jay, your comments are both palate-cleansing and additive. Liberals, for the 6+ decades I've been conscious of their views,have always used terms such as "obscene wealth", "more money than one needs" and "additional income" to cover their own lust for "obscene power", "more extra-constitutional power" and "newly invented government powers" over the individual. Yet as Mr. Clinton's reported income indicates, today's government "power" is related to tomorrow's "obscene wealth".