Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
More Jackson Hole Shock-and-Awe?
We’ve seen this Bernanke movie before.

By Larry Kudlow


About Author Archive Latest RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

Ben Bernanke’s shocking FOMC announcement on Tuesday — that its zero-interest-rate target would be extended for two more years through the middle of 2013 — drove Dow stocks up over 400 points. But this new policy had no stock market carry-over on Wednesday, when the Dow plunged over 500 points.

But we have not heard the last from Ben Bernanke — not by a long shot.

Buried in the last paragraph of this week’s surprise FOMC announcement was this huge statement: “The Committee discussed the range of policy tools available to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.”

This is a brand-new statement. And in all likelihood it was purposefully open-ended. A Fed source suggests that this sort of stuff is usually left out of sight and buried in Fed committee minutes, released well after the FOMC meeting, and not put boldly in the actual policy statement. So clearly, it’s very important.

What might it mean?

When Bernanke speaks at the Fed’s Jackson Hole, Wyoming, meeting on August 26, he could conceivably launch a real shock-and-awe stimulus program. If you go back a year, when Bernanke first announced QE2 at Jackson Hole, sources tell me that the original debate over the quantity of bond purchases had a $2 trillion balance-sheet expansion on the table. Inflation hawks beat that number back to $600 billion. But now the rest of that $2 trillion — or $1.4 trillion — could conceivably be on the table for a new QE3 announcement by the Fed.

A new round of Fed bond purchases would likely be aimed at pinning long-term interest rates down as much as possible. In other words, the Fed will be buying 10-year paper and maybe even 30-year paper to get those yields down even more (10-years are currently around 2 percent). The idea would be to reduce the attractiveness of government bonds and get investors into riskier assets like stocks, or perhaps even new-business and venture-capital start-ups where potential yields look even more attractive. There may even be some job-creation in all this.

Plus, the Fed’s potential Jackson Hole shock-and-awe program could include the removal of the 25-basis-point Fed payment on the $1.6 trillion excess bank reserve now on deposit at the central bank. If the banks no longer earn a safe 25 basis points, they might conceivably lend more.

And if long-term rates come down as per Bernanke’s target bond purchases, mortgage rates might come down even more to the benefit of future and current homeowners.

Politically, inside the Fed, three regional bank presidents dissented from the unprecedented Fed decision to keep its target rate down for two more years. But the inner circle of Fed power — Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and William Dudley — has enough votes from other Fed board governors and reserve-bank presidents to jam through almost any shock-an-awe it wants. All this could be announced formally at the next Fed meeting on September 20, but Bernanke himself is likely to let the cat out of the bag in Jackson Hole toward the end of this month.  

The trouble with all this is that it didn’t work the last time with QE2, and it will have no permanent effect on the slumping economy. Targeting bond yields and printing more money simply distorts asset prices throughout the financial markets. We’ve seen this movie before. And it didn’t play well. The Fed’s shock-and-awe risks another round of dollar depreciation. It’s part of the message of skyrocketing gold prices right now.

Unleashing dormant animal spirits in this economy can only come from the fiscal side, with low-tax and regulatory reforms to provide new economic-growth incentives and lower the cost of doing business. A pro-growth package from Washington is what we really need. It should be part of the next round of budget cuts, included in the work of the super committee during phase two of the debt deal.

Without those new incentives for growth, the Fed can print all the new money in the world and the federal government can spend itself into oblivion, and none of it will resurrect the economy.

– Larry Kudlow, NRO’s economics editor, is host of CNBC’s The Kudlow Report and author of the daily web log, Kudlow’s Money Politic$.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Will Fear Decide Texas Senate Race?

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST



COMMENTS   12

EXPAND  

   08/10/11 18:50

Larry,
your not only cute, but you hit the nail on the head.
You should look into Austrian Economics. It is a good fit for you

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/10/11 19:40

The central banker's ability to print money and buy bonds creates the situation where there is too much money chasing too few good investments. 10 year bonds at 2%? No, thank you. Risky Internet start-ups? No, thank you. Gold and cash? You bet.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/10/11 20:38

A Fed move to keep money out of notes and bonds is the right move. It will tend to make capital move towards investment in firms. It will also improve US exports via the exchange rate. The effect may not be large, but the flight to bonds has to be stopped. Money in bonds is not productive.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
locke1
   08/10/11 22:28

Bernanke has fired every arrow in his quiver to no real positive effect. Now we should be enthralled to believe that AN even larger printing of money might be beneficial? If that is the case why do we ever turn off those wonderful printing machines, why we could just literally produce mountains of more money. Oh, let me turn my sarcasm off.

Larry, you know that this is little more than taxation without even having a legislated right to do so. Inflation is the most pernicious of all governmental actions.

Today I am left pondering why it is that we allow the economy to suffer for what is good for the government, less valuable dollars means the value of the government's debt is smaller, and ignores what that means for Mr and Mrs. Smith trying to buy milk, groceries and gasoline.

The Road to Slavery is paved with all forms of platitudes and quotable kindnesses.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 JEM
   08/10/11 22:58

How in the world would Ben believe that idea when he reads the regional fed reports which show the problem isn't interest rates - employers aren't hiring because of the president and his policies.

Is he that delusional?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
JayGeis
   08/11/11 02:05

I am in the middle of refinancing my mortage. Should I wait a few more weeks for better rates?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
DAvid134243
   08/11/11 04:24

Is this the same guy who was all in favor of the cash for car-clunkers program? I agree that even more Fed-fabricated cash shouldn't be tossed at the clunker of an economy, but there is inconsistency here. I second the reader who suggested that Kudlow study Austrian economics. Start with Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson, continue with Rothbard's Man, Economy and State and Mises's Human Action. And visit mises.org.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Larmeau
   08/11/11 11:23
joe1234
   08/11/11 09:59

Larry, the fed will spend US into oblivion...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Perplexed
   08/11/11 11:44

I like Larry and always watch his show. He is a savy businessman and big supporter of capitalism. However, I think that he is reserved because of his affiliation with CNBC. Too bad!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Brad Nygren
   08/11/11 11:58

If the idea behind QE is to discourage banks from chasing easy money in treasuries and force them to invest in the economy, why not raise the discount rate closer to the treasury yield instead of going to all this trouble to lower yields by destroying the currency and with it, the net worth of the middle class? How can the Fed think that a few decimal points on the interest rate is the barrier to investment in this economy - how about the regulatory minefield, associated legal costs and high corporate tax rate?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   08/11/11 12:23

Good piece.

"The trouble with all this is that it didn’t work the last time with QE2, and it will have no permanent effect on the slumping economy."

Can someone tell me what version of QE is going to prime the pump? QE5? QE10?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact