Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
The Faith of Joe Lieberman
Politicians, he reminds us, do not lose their First Amendment rights.

By Robert Costa


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

As we discuss his new book, The Gift of Rest, in his Capitol Hill office, Sen. Joe Lieberman mentions his longtime friendship with National Review’s late founder, William F. Buckley Jr. Over 20 years ago, in 1988, Buckley famously endorsed Lieberman, who was challenging moderate Republican incumbent Lowell Weicker. The pair, both with ties to Stamford, Conn. — Lieberman a native, Buckley a resident — remained close following Lieberman’s surprise victory. They exchanged letters and phone calls, and mused about politics and family.

“He teased me that year, to please not indulge in the fantasy that he would ever again vote for me,” Lieberman chuckles. Nonetheless, Buckley, he says, became a “major force in my life.” The political gap between Lieberman, a devout Orthodox Jew and Democrat, and Buckley, a devout Catholic and conservative, may have been steep, but the respect for each other’s intellectual and spiritual pursuits was constant. “It is my view, and I think Bill’s view as well, that faith precedes everything else,” Lieberman says.

Advertisement

Those discussions on faith — with Buckley, with family, with rabbis — have been on Lieberman’s mind this year. Now 69 years old, he has decided not to run for reelection in 2012. Instead of writing a tell-all memoir, or a polemic, he decided to publish a book about his religious life, a love letter to the Sabbath, which he observes, beginning every Friday at sundown, when he turns off the BlackBerry and hangs up the car keys.

In the style of Buckley’s own meditation on faith, Nearer, My God, Lieberman, in The Gift of Rest, encourages readers to mull their own religious practices, placing an emphasis on the value of tradition and commitment. He takes great joy in describing, in vivid detail, the sights and smells of the Jewish Sabbath, from the aroma of baked challah bread and kugel, a sweet noodle dish, to prayers with his children.

Lieberman also acknowledges his struggle, at times, with keeping the Sabbath. Obstacles, he says, have always appeared, from his stressful undergraduate years at Yale to his hectic Senate schedule, which often includes Friday evening or Saturday votes. “I’ve never really talked a lot about it, about why I do it and what we do,” he says. But as his time in Washington winds down, “I thought it’d be wonderful to invite the reader to come to a Sabbath,” he says. “It’s a millennia-old institution, more relevant than ever.”

Lieberman, who in 2000 accepted the Democratic nomination for vice president, is known as a feisty, independent politician. In 2006, he lost his primary battle against liberal Democrat Ned Lamont, only to come back and win the general as an independent. In 2008, he endorsed his friend, Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.), for the presidency. He assures me that he remains liberal, but when he leaves the Senate, he wants to be remembered for more than his politics.

As the first Jewish politician to land on a major-party ticket, Lieberman, of course, is already in the history books. More important to him, however, is that readers understand that being a leader in Washington — Democrat or Republican — does not mean that a person has to lighten his commitment to his faith or publicly temper his devotion. “Particularly, as I end this chapter in my life,” Lieberman says, he wants to underscore how important it is for “public people, elected officials to speak about faith,” even if such talk is pooh-poohed by politicos.

Lieberman respects Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, two Republican presidential contenders who have spoken up about their faith on the trail. “I know this got controversial recently, with Governor Perry and Congresswoman Bachmann. But they didn’t give up their First Amendment right to free expression and freedom of religion when they decided to run for president,” he says. “I like it when a candidate, if they feel comfortable, talks about their faith. It’s very interesting to me; it tells me more about the candidate, giving me one more factor to evaluate about what kind of president they would be.”

“Others may be turned off by it, even by the very fact that you’re talking about it, or the way you’re articulating it,” Lieberman says. “That’s the risk you take.” But he emphasizes that while some may find Perry’s public prayers troubling, or Bachmann’s Christian declarations strange, many Americans find such words “reassuring.” In this sense, he urges all politicians, if they are so inclined, to speak up, even if they are not religious experts, in order to make politics more hospitable to religious discussions.

“This is classic America,” Lieberman says. “The Constitution promises freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The whole history of the country is intertwined with religion. The founding documents are premised on a world view, actually a very creationist world view.” Since then, “We have found a way to invite religion into the public square without pushing all but one religion out. It’s remarkable.”

In the private backrooms of the Capitol, behind the Senate chamber, Lieberman often shares these thoughts with his colleagues, many of whom are Christian. There is a sense, he says, that below the partisan bickering, and all the crosstalk, is a common appreciation of what the United States is, as an idea, and the values that sustain it.

With his new book, Lieberman reflects on these issues, to be sure, but his words, more broadly, serve as a rallying cry for tradition, be it the “gift” of the Sabbath, a tight-knit family, national service, or personal responsibility. It is not a lament, but a reminder that the old ways can bring modern joy, if only embraced. Looking back at his childhood, he remembers: “In those days, those ancient days, we still had the ‘blue laws,’ where a lot of businesses were closed, people didn’t have to go to work, and most of my friends were expected to go to church on Sunday.”

“I grew up in a very Catholic neighborhood, a lot of my friends were Catholic in Stamford,” he says. “When I talk to them about this, they miss it. And I agree. I think the whole society is missing something.” To fill in that void, he says the Jewish Sabbath, regardless of one’s religion, is worth reviewing — especially if it can motivate someone, if only for a moment, to turn off the BlackBerry or unplug the laptop. If a senator can, he laughs, so can you.

Robert Costa is a political reporter for National Review.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Will Fear Decide Texas Senate Race?

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST



COMMENTS   28

EXPAND  

John Walker
   09/16/11 07:08

Joe is a pearl of great price. The Christian Bible is a little bit thicker than the Hebrew Scriptures. The N.T. can be viewed as volume 2. Can't understand the second part without reading the first part. Same God. The Christians are the spiritual chidren of Abraham. The Hebrews are his genetic children.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 08:05

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (writing in First Things): "...there are important truths about the human condition that cannot be accounted for in terms of work or economics. And, on the Sabbath: "the Sabbath is one of those phenomena - incomprehensible from the outside - that you have to live in order to understand. For countless generations of Jews, it was the still point in the turning world, the moment ... during which we live the truth that the world is not wholly ours to bend to our will but something given to us in trust to conserve for future generations, and in which the inequalities of a market economy are counterbalanced by a world in which money does not count, in which we are all equal citizens."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
True Choice
   09/19/11 13:44

Truly the Sabbath provides us an opportunity to truly trust "the Almighty". Even when I don't honor the day as I ought, I know that it is a reminder that there is One greater than me and my pursuits. This is what makes the back and forth about abortion so distressing. We all know that it's morally wrong to murder the innocent, but we place greater value on deflecting our responsibility by supporting someone else's right to chhose. It's a false argument. The Eternal One has given us the right to choose but has also given us a clue by telling us to "Choose Life, that it may go well with us and our descendants."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bulldog 82
   09/16/11 09:33

When I went to college (1978) they required all freshmen to attend Church the first 2 weekends. They didn't care where you went but you had to go. They understood the pressures that would be on us and the sanctuary you find in God.

The Military has always understood the importance of worship. When you walk into a place of worship on a military base everyone is the same. The only seniority that matters is thet The Almighty is almighty and we are lowly privates.

I was always impressed when Joe refused to work on the Sabbath. We should probably not have any debates on the weekends.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 10:01

Until Senator Lieberman stops supporting abortion on demand for any and every reason, including partial birth abortion, his book and "blah blah blah" are one and the same.

He truly strains at a gnat and swallows a camel, like the Pharisees of old.

Pray for Joe Lieberman.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Steven Gerrard
   09/16/11 10:12

I'm not familiar with orthodox Judaism and its views on abortion, birth control and sexuality in general, but perhaps they view this issue differently than fundamentalist Christians? It's like him saying, "Until Dean from Ohio stops eating pork, then his comments are blah, blah, blah." You are aware that DIFFERENT religions look at issues in DIFFERENT ways?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 12:01

How can eating pork be the same as sucking out a live, late-term, pre-born baby's brains and crushing its skull, which Joe Lieberman voted to keep legal in the U.S.? Honestly, you talk like a 90-pound weakling, morally speaking.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/17/11 03:25

Until you acknowledge that your view is not the only one that even devout people espouse, you'll make no progress in your battle to end to procedure in question. The bible actually does address the issue of the worth of a fetus, in questions about various forms of restitution--someone who causes a miscarriage pays a fine, as opposed to someone who commits a murder, which is treated quite differently.

As it happens, I agree with Mother Teresa--but you cannot conduct an argument if you utterly refuse to deal with your opponent's actual beliefs as opposed the beliefs you think he ought to have.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
straggler
   09/18/11 06:48

Jews believe that abortion is killing.

However, it's permissible to save the life of the mother (as if you were being pursued by an attacker) - and even morally justified. I don't know much about Senator Lieberman's abortion views, but I would presume he supports the option to allow for those abortions.

Personally, I think our abortion laws are far too liberal. I don't automatically ascribe moral obtuseness to those who disagree.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
MamaMia
   09/16/11 10:26

You have completely missed the point. He is a humanist and an incredible human being. On a personal level, he may not be for abortion but he upholds a woman's right to choose. If Republicans will continue to harp on abortion, they will lose most of the presidential elections, and in 2012 there is too much at stake to loose.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 11:44

Since WWII the Republicans have held the office of President for more years than the Democrats, in spite of 'harping' on the abortion issue. I would also hazard a guess that President Truman, a Democrat, would have been pro-abortion, as no one was at that time. The Republicans need to 'harp' on lots of things besides abortion in order to rid ourselves of President Obama, but moral values still have to matter.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 11:58

Mother Teresa famously said, "If abortion is not wrong, nothing is wrong." Sucking a live, late-term pre-born baby's brains out and crushing its skull, all without anesthesia mind you, is barbaric no matter what religion you do or don't adhere to. That is the point.

Pretending that doesn't matter reveals a hardened heart, as Naomi Wolf (also famously) said.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 12:42

This is one of the better articles I have read on this web site where most of the opinion is antagonistic hostile rhetoric like we get from Dean from Ohio. To be conservative, it is important to realize that you have more in common with people that have different political philosophies, than differences. We need to focus more on our own personal faith and moral values and less on others'.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 14:55

If Senator Lieberman would abstain from votes on partial birth abortion instead of supporting them, it would be easier to focus more on my own faith.

Sorry, but standing up for the weak and defenseless is non-negotiable. This is the hill to die on, so to speak. Plenty of pre-born children already have.

Please note I said to die on, not kill for. I'm not advocating violence here; the violent ones are the abortionists, who commit gruesome acts daily, and their supporters. Ironic that I'm the one that has to include a disclaimer like this, don't you think?

Additionally, I'll not self-censor my own religious views in the formation of public policy, nor should I. Neither should you.

Finally, abortion is a topic entirely befitting an expression of antagonism. Pointing out moral blind spots is a job of intellectuals, but where are they here? Where are they now? In 2004, a conservative intellectual named William F. Buckley--you may have heard of him--stated this about partial birth abortion: "A political event is needed to affirm that a democratic society is free to react against uncivilized practices, athwart abstractions of the judiciary." - External Link 

As someone has written, when the great fall, the lesser must lead. I see precious little of that leadership here, judging from the comments on this thread.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bob in Va
   09/16/11 21:30

I agree with you Dean. Th Senator follows the "law" but not the "commandment" I could agree to disagree on most of what he advocates....but he looses religious credibility with his horrific pro abortion, pro partial birth abortion voting record.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bob in Va
   09/16/11 21:33

I agree with you Dean. Th Senator follows the "law" but not the "commandment" I could agree to disagree on most of what he advocates....but he looses religious credibility with his horrific pro abortion, pro partial birth abortion voting record.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bob in Va
   09/16/11 21:40

I agree with you Dean. Th Senator follows the "law" but not the "commandment" I could agree to disagree on most of what he advocates....but he looses religious credibility with his horrific pro abortion, pro partial birth abortion voting record.

I note to that the subtitle of the article reminds us of our right of religious liberty...how strange when liberty interest, of which life is central, had no bearing in his abortion voting record.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/16/11 13:07

I did not know that there was any politician in the D.C. area that honors a holy "day of rest". Learning this about Sen. Lieberman deepens my respect for a man for which I already have a lot of respect.

On the side issue of abortion, I believe that there are conflicting views within the Jewish community on when the results of a pregnancy are filled with a soul.

I'm not sure ... but I believe that the common view for Judaism is when the baby draws its first breath outside the womb. But I bow to those more familiar with that religion than I on whether that's correct or not.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Miriam
   09/16/11 17:59

The sould enters the embryo on the 41st day after conception. Menachos 99b.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   09/17/11 12:29

Any Jew that holds any regard for the Torah or the writings should have qualms about abortion when s/he reads the following:
"I was cast upon thee from the womb; thou art my *God from my mother’s belly." Psalm 22:10
"Lo, children are an inheritance from YHWH, and the fruit of the womb a reward." Psalm 127:3
"And their bows shall dash the young men to pieces, and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb: their eye shall not spare children." Isiah 13:8

There are many more but the point is not easily missed for any reader of the Old Testament -- Jew or Christian.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact