“We don’t allow faster-than-light neutrinos in here,” says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
— Joke circulating on the Internet
The world as we know it is on the brink of disintegration, on the verge of dissolution. No, I’m not talking about the collapse of the euro, of international finance, of the Western economies, of the democratic future, of the unipolar moment, of the American dream, of French banks, of Greece as a going concern, of Europe as an idea, of Pax Americana.
Advertisement
I am talking about something far more important. Which is why it made only the back pages of your newspaper, if it made it at all. Scientists at CERN (the European high-energy physics consortium) have announced the discovery of a particle that can travel faster than light.
Neutrinos fired 454 miles from a supercollider outside Geneva to an underground laboratory in Gran Sasso, Italy, took less time (60 nanoseconds less) than light to get there. Or so the physicists think. Or so they measured. Or so they have concluded after checking for every possible artifact and experimental error.
The implications of such a discovery are so mind boggling, however, that these same scientists immediately requested that other labs around the world try to replicate the experiment. Something must have been wrong to account for a result that, if we know anything about the universe, is impossible.
And that’s the problem. It has to be impossible because, if not, everything we know about the universe is wrong.
The fundamental axiom of Einstein’s theory of relativity is the absolute prohibition on speed faster than light. Einstein’s predictions about how time slows and mass increases as one approaches the speed of light have been verified by a mountain of experimental evidence. As velocity increases, mass approaches infinity and time slows to zero, making it progressively and, ultimately, infinitely difficult to achieve light speed. Which is why nothing does. And nothing ever has.
Until two weeks ago Thursday.
That’s when the results were announced. To oversimplify grossly: If the Gran Sasso scientists had a plate to record the arrival of the neutrinos and a super-powerful telescope to peer (through the Alps!) directly into the lab in Geneva from which they were being fired, the Gran Sasso guys would have “heard” the neutrinos clanging against the plate before they observed the Geneva guys squeeze the trigger on the neutrino gun.
Sixty nanoseconds before, to be precise. Wrap your mind around that one.
It’s as if someone told you that yesterday at drive time Topeka was released from Earth’s gravity. These things don’t happen. Natural laws don’t just expire between shifts at McDonald’s.
Not that there aren’t already mysteries in physics. Neutrinos themselves are ghostly particles that travel through nearly everything unimpeded. (Thousands are traversing your body as you read this.) But that is simplicity itself compared to quantum mechanics, whose random arbitrariness so offended Einstein that he famously objected that God does not play dice with the universe.
Aphorisms don’t trump reality, however. They are but a frail, poignant protest against a Nature that disdains the most cherished human notions of order and elegance, truth and beauty.
But if quantum mechanics was a challenge to human sensibilities, this pesky Swiss-Italian neutrino is their undoing. It means that Einstein’s relativity — a theory of uncommon beauty upon which all of physics has been built for 100 years — is wrong. Not just inaccurate. Not just flawed. But deeply, fundamentally, indescribably wrong.
It means that the “standard model” of subatomic particles that stands at the center of all modern physics is wrong.
Nor does it stop there. This will not just overthrow physics. Astronomy and cosmology measure time and distance in the universe on the assumption of light speed as the cosmic limit. Their foundations will shake as well.
It cannot be. Yet, this is not a couple of guys in a garage peddling cold fusion. This is no crank wheeling a perpetual-motion machine into the patent office. These are the best researchers in the world using the finest measuring instruments, having subjected their data to the highest levels of scrutiny, including six months of cross-checking by 160 scientists from eleven countries.
But there must be some error. Because otherwise everything changes. We shall need a new physics. A new cosmology. New understandings of past and future, of cause and effect. Then shortly and surely, new theologies.
Why? Because you can’t have neutrinos getting kicked out of taverns they have not yet entered.
A fascinating article, but it has arrived before it is written.
The scientists have indeed been checking these results for error and have, so far, found none. Yet they have not announced this result as they remain skeptical for precisely the reasons written here.
Neutrinos are thought to have mass altho a very very tiny one and it may vary with the species of which there are at least three. Special relativity can be saved if photons also have a tiny mass which is greater than the muon neutrino mass. Call it Special Relativity 2.0!
If Einsteins Theory is wrong then what credence can be placed on any other scientific theory like Darwin's and Global Warming? Something fundamentally wrong here with scientific methodology? Took a thousand years for Leonardo to disprove Aristotle and Copernicus 1,000 years to dispprove the earth as center of all things. Einstein appaently lasted only 110 years.
When the most sacrosanct of scientific theories is in question what is next?
Scientific theories are just theories. This is good science - a theory holds until it is proved false.
If a theory becomes 'sacrosanct', this is bad science, as the job of science is to continuously question, continually test, and continually reevaluate.
Sacrosanct theories get dubbed laws. For example Newton's laws of motion and are theories that have stood for so long it is pretty much inconceivable they are wrong.
However, the larger point is well taken and agreed to. It even becomes harder for the AGW crowd (and economists) because it is dang hard to set up realistic (and in some cases, morally acceptable ones) and controllable experiments on the climate (economic systems). Evolutionists have similar obstacles, they can observe but not experiment.
@mframn
Can I remind you that Einstein proved Newtonian physics was not absolute.
Newton's 'laws' are useful tools with practical applications but they most certainly are not absolute predictors of how the universe works and thus it is not only conceivable that they are wrong, they are wrong.
You just proved my point by using the 'test of time' model to make Newton’s laws sacrosanct when they shouldn’t be. No theory (or physical ‘law’) should be.
Such doings weaken scientific validity and make the charlatans of AGW and the like more influential among the non-scientifically trained electorate.
Good point. Somewhere along the line, the very meaning of the word "theory" seems to have gotten lost. You would think the routine "discovery" of supposedly-extinct or previously unknown species the world over would give folks pause as to what we REALLY know... even about our own habitat, much less the universe at large.
All that is needed is a lot of scientists to state that the consensus of opinion is that the speed of light is the speed limit in the universe and all will be put back in order. Works for AGW.
A fundamental flaw in Stephen Hawkings' latest "M" Theory, or the theory of multiple universes - in the convoluted attempts by Hawkings and other scientists to avoid the obvious answer that God exists - is the failure to address the ultimate question of Who or What created the laws of physics in the first place.
Could this be an attempt to provide that "answer?"
Will be interesting to see what the famed British physicist's take is on this one.
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools."
God must be laughing at all these wanna-be atheist scientists groping in the dark for the theory of everything when we really understand nothing. Hawking is Exhibit 'A', trapped in a mind so smart it won't let him admit the obvious - his mind is a random act of nature that can no more think logically that a sea bass (according to his god).
Piltdown Man was the tip of the iceberg of the scam that is modern 'science', where theories turn into facts magically based on how much science actually negates the theory.
Amen. There is no common sense or finality when it comes to physics and astronomy. It takes a peculiar arrogance to think that science is going to power on and ultimately answer all questions. I predict mankind will be humbled -- again and again and again.
All you doomsayers out there: put THAT in your global warming/impending Ice Age/world hunger/Population Bomb/peak oil/nuclear winter bongs and smoke it.