Team Obama is out and about mourning a “double-dip recession,” while Fed head Ben Bernanke is warning of a faltering economy. I have described the current economic environment as the front end of a recession.
But Obama’s populist, class-warfare attack on millionaires and billionaires, his new war on bank profits, his linking arms with the protesters occupying Wall Street, and his big-government stimulus plan will surely not solve this crisis.
The September jobs report underscores the economic alarm. The unemployment rate stayed at 9.1 percent. But the rate of marginally unemployed (U6) jumped from 16.2 percent to 16.5 percent. Nonfarm payrolls rose by 103,000 while private payrolls gained by 137,000, small-enough increases to dodge a recession bullet right now. But nearly half those job gains came from the return of 45,000 striking Verizon workers.
Advertisement
And while the small-business household survey showed an encouraging jump of 398,000, it turns out that an even larger 444,000 are only working part-time. So household employment — excluding the part timers — actually fell by 46,000. That’s a discouraging sign. At the same time, worker earnings are rising less than the inflation rate. That’s a consumer drag on the economy.
Were it not for the business investment of highly profitable companies, we’d be in the recession soup right now. But that doesn’t stop President Obama from attacking these corporations, especially the oil and gas firms that if left alone could save the entire economy.
When their first stimulus bill passed in 2009, the White House projected the jobless rate would be close to 6 percent today, not 9.1 percent. But that’s not the main reason for Team Obama’s double-dip economic panic. They’re trying to sell their faux jobs package, with its $200 billion in higher spending and $250 billion in temporary tax cuts.
People are not stupid. They know the spending won’t work. And they also know they cannot spend or invest a temporary tax cut, which goes away in a year.
President Bush tried this rebate idea and it failed. President Obama has already tried it once, and it failed too.
Here’s the real silliness of all this. The Obama plan would permanently raise tax rates in order to pay for a temporary tax cut. In other words, taxes are going up, not down, as far as the eye can see under Obama’s program.
And here’s more silliness. The White House and Senate Democrats want a 5.6 percent surtax on millionaires, which is supposed to pay for the entire stimulus package. And don’t forget: The Obama budget would raise the Bush tax rates for people making over $200,000, while the Obamacare budget would substantially increase payroll taxes that apply to investors. On top of that, the Obama budget would lower the value of numerous personal deductions.
So the top personal tax rate would move to nearly 50 percent under the Obama plan. Now do the incentive math. At a 50 percent tax rate, successful earners, investors, and small-business owners would keep only 50 cents on the extra dollar earned. Under current law, however, at the 35 percent top income-tax rate, they would keep 65 cents. So if the plan goes through, it would mean a 23 percent reduction in marginal incentives. This in a stalled economy where job creation doesn’t keep up with a rising population and is less than half the necessary level to shrink the unemployment rate.
Of course, the individuals and families who would suffer the greatest tax-penalty increases are the ones who are most likely to invest and run small businesses. In fact, Treasury data show that over 80 percent of millionaire tax filers reflect small-business income. Why demonize them? This is what Gov. Chris Christie meant when he said President Obama is sending a “demoralizing” message.
This tax attack is the latest assault from a White House that is making a sharp populist shift to the left. It coincides with a president who trashed the Bank of America for raising debit-card fees in response to a Dodd-Frank price-control edict, and who suggests that banks do not have an inherent right to profit. It’s in league with a president who is throwing in with the Wall Street protesters. And it’s a sorry sign that the White House doesn’t understand that anti-capitalist nostrums will not solve our economic problems.
How about unleashing a wave of free-market capitalism, which has proven to be the best path to prosperity?
If the enviro's didn't practice all the dogmas of their "religion", then it's true that the oil and gas industry could single-handlely save this country, help reduce the debt, and create thousands and thousands of jobs. But they want "green" jobs no matter the cost....maybe even our country.
"But they want 'green' jobs no matter the cost....maybe even our country."
Based on the empirical evidence, the operational definition of a 'green job' is open-ended unemployment benefits plus food stamps. This is offered to you by the same fine folks who spin gauzy pieties about "sustainability".
I agree, and it's the only part of Larry's comment that I disagreed with. This is not a shift. Obama has been anti-business since day 1. Look at his healthcare plan, bank regulation, political payoff "stimulus" plan, NLRB, etc etc ect. He has been consistently divisive, and has never made any attempt to work with Republicans. Making proposals that you know in advance are intolerable to the other side, and then blaming the other side for not working with you, has been his strategy all along. Nothing new here.
You lie!!!!! The Bush evil is responsible for all the misery in the economy and the world. Obama is RIGHT to question the morals of the banking industry that HE saved. People -- get behind the president and the protest!
Fear not, Gerri,
America will "get behind" the president alright--the way the president has been "getting" America's "behind" since his inauguration.
The date is November 6, 2012.
Common on, Larry, the Government is not nearly big enough.
We need far more arrogant and lazy bureaucrats dreaming up longer and more complex forms for us to fill out. We can't possibly reduce such job killing endeavors. I mean, would you rather have a new car or more bureaucratic committee meetings?
And we're not taxed nearly enough. There is still not a tax on talking (unless you talk on the phone or over the air). And just because it increases prices, you can't really consider printing money a tax. The fact is, we work for the government and we should consider ourselves lucky they give us anything.
Instead of a jobs bill, how about a "Start New American Businesses" bill? Train people how to start businesses. There are resources available already but most people don't know how to access them, and others think that they could never start a business. Teach them how.
Also, do the Fed Reserve banks offer private individual checking accounts and free debit card use? No? (i suspect no accounts at all. But I don't know.)
"Forty-seven percent of South Carolina Republican and Republican-leaning voters surveyed said they did not think it was possible to balance the budget without a tax increase, while 45 percent said a tax increase is not necessary.
Seven percent said they were not sure.
'That is surprising, simply because it goes against the echo chambers and punditry who are constantly saying, "No Republicans believe in any tax (hikes)," ' said Scott Huffmon, a political science professor at Winthrop University and the director of The Winthrop Poll."
The president is following the Greek model. Hire more govt employees, borrow money, hire more, tax more. Demonize the rich while hiring more govt employees. Look how well it has worked in California. The Democrats will never be voted out of office and the budget will never balance.
"How about unleashing a wave of free-market capitalism, which has proven to be the best path to prosperity?"
How about understanding that BHO has little or no interest in restoring American prosperity, but great interest in turning this country into a copy of the Soviet Union in the 1960s. That is the bottom line in every action he takes, every policy he pursues, every appointment he announces.
It's pretty clear that the facade has fallen from the Great Oz's face and we're seeing the only things he believes in - socialism. The wealthy, the investors, have been demonized from day one in the Barry Administration, and since Barry has nothing to lose but all the independents that carried him in 2008, he's going all-in. He's going to stomp on the stupid accelerator as a means to buy votes, again, and it will work, as it always does, with certain segments of the population that either receive re-distributed wealth, or believe that re-distributed wealth achieves the amorphous "fairness" goal so long touted by deceased, genocidal maniacs.
How many lives have been damaged by Barry? How many people aren't able to live their dreams and prosper, because an avowed Socialist with a micron-deep resume' was thrown into his dream job by blathering dolts who think that somebody, somewhere, is going to pay for everything they feel they deserve?
America was tricked into electing this socialist/facist obama. The guilt trip was played on them to proved they were not racists in 2008. Now we have the worst president in U.S. history actually destroying the country.
In 2008 you voted to prove you were not a racist...
In 2012 vote out obama to prove you are not an idiot.
America was tricked into electing this socialist/facist obama. The guilt trip was played on them to prove they were not racists in 2008. Now we have the worst president in U.S. history actually destroying the country.
In 2008 you voted to prove you were not a racist...
In 2012 vote out obama to prove you are not an idiot.