Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin recently said something both profound and essential. As she was nearing her decision not to launch a presidential campaign — appearing to discern what role she could best play in national affairs, and perhaps preparing to let her most ardent supporters down easy — she asked Fox News host Greta Van Susteren, “Is a title worth it? Does a title shackle a person?” She continued: “Does a title take away my freedom to call it like I see it and to affect positive change that we need in this country? That’s the biggest contemplation piece in my process.”
Such questions could be interpreted as indicative of a dismaying attitude toward public service. But they may also demonstrate an admirable self-awareness, and a keen appreciation of the different ways one might play a role in public life.
Advertisement
We all have our roles. There are expressly political roles; there are roles that are a mix of political rallying, education, and entertainment; there is purse service — donation and stewardship. Some are more focused on using creative talent, and some seek full-on cultural engagement. And we are not all destined for C-SPAN or ABC, for a podium, or for the silver screen. But all of us have a call — a desire that we may recognize as having been put in our heart as a gift, as a mission.
Just ask Bill Simon.
A funny thing happened when I was on the phone with him this summer. In the heat of the debt-ceiling debate, I had called to ask him about the debate, about how Washington was handling things. Simon was polite, sharing his opinion, sharing his concern for the need for fundamental reform. But it was impossible not to notice that, while he was happy to help a writer in need, he had much more important things on his mind, things of a much more fundamental and enduring nature.
Simon is known as a successful businessman, a philanthropist, briefly a politician (he ran for governor of California in 2002), and the son of a former U.S. Treasury secretary. He was raised in a big Catholic family but had subsequently fallen away. He writes in his new book, Living the Call: An Introduction to the Lay Vocation (coauthored with Michael Novak), that he had had fleeting moments of piety, as he “yearned for greater spiritual engagement, but that feeling would usually disappear amid the busyness of life.”
Then, he explains, “about a dozen years ago, with some significant professional and material success under my belt, I began to feel that something was missing, that maybe these things in my life — my family, my faith, and my career — shouldn’t be separate. And maybe the balance among the three wasn’t quite right.”
And so, as he is happy to tell you, he started to pray. He started to encounter the richness of his Catholic faith. He started to read St. Francis de Sales, for the first time. “The Catholic Church has had 2,000 years of thinkers and traditions that are every bit as relevant today as they ever were,” he tells me — something that, about a dozen years ago, “a cradle Catholic was discovering for the first time.”
He is now 59, and he now realizes that there is a role in his Church for the laity, that God calls us all to play a role in our families, in our places of business, in our communities.
“I don’t feel like I should devote the bulk of the rest of my life to getting a greater return on my financial investments,” he says. “I want to make a positive difference in people’s lives. I have found a calling.” He is utterly convinced that his work now is to get people to focus on eternal business. The book he has written isn’t about his story — it’s about the various ways in which lay people that you may pass on the street today live out what they believe. We won’t all go to Calcutta, but there are real opportunities to serve our brothers and sisters all around us, doing small things with great love close to home, and answering more sweeping calls.
There is a sense out there that we have lost focus. In their own ways, both the Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street movement are expressions of this concern, one that goes beyond mere policy. What needs to occupy our minds and our souls is what Simon wishes he had known all along: that we all have our roles — in church, in the culture, and in our homes as much as in politics. And our roles need to be rooted in and headed toward something beyond the next business deal or the next election. Real moral courage and leadership runs deep, inspired by something beyond ourselves.
Simon now talks enthusiastically about The Imitation of Christ, a treasure trove of practical spiritual pointers, and a book he wishes he had known about much earlier. Bill Simon now has a very different role from any he had previously played or sought. He is not shackled by titles. He is responding to a call, and nourished by the wisdom of the ages. It’s beyond the headlines, with the power to make new ones.
— Kathryn Jean Lopez is editor-at-large ofNational Review Online. This column is available exclusively through United Media.
I also was a lapsed Catholic fortunate enough to discover by marital crisis the importance of a power greater than myself.
I still don't know what produces that moment of surrender and discovery for others, but maybe Paul's example of being knocked off a high horse serves as a generalizable allegory.
Not everyone can go to Calcutta, true. But it is also true that sitting in a garage does not make one a car. Matthew 25 shows how one incarnates Jesus. The practice of welcoming the stranger, visiting the prisoner, feeding the hungry, etc. is a way to experience Jesus, just as he promised. And to learn that we only really understand by experience.
It's bothersome when NRO writers don't bother t o research the subject matter before writing an easy article that implies more about them than the subject.
This is not a sudden realization that one has, at age 47, determined her role in life. Upon better examination, the writer would have discover the truth.
Governor Palin described her priorities as being in order, God, family, and country. It so happens the Governor Palin described in a recent radio interview that two of four children wanted her to run for president now while two others did not. One of her daughters in soon approaching high school graduation. It's not hard to deduce that she would like finish school with the rest of her classmates.
Governor Palin is still young in terms of a future run. In the interim, she will play a decisive role in helping conservatives win 2012 elections.
No, this is not sudden decision as to what Governor Palin should do in life, but a recognition of the needs of family members at a tender age.
One might take your comment seriously if you weren't so intent on bashing Palin instead of knowing the facts. Contributors of SarahPAC are aware that those funds can not be used for a POTUS campaign. Yes, the letter said she was on the verge of a decision, and it was asking for funds to further its ability to support other candidates, and yes, for her to promote conservative issues.
With all respect Kathryn, but the tortured self-questioning which you ascribe to Mrs Palin in your first couple paragraphs is only political calculation.
And thank goodness intelligent people will not have to endure - for the immediate future at least - this lady's public and embarrassing indulgence of self.
Perhaps Ms. Palin is not the best person to ruminate about the shackles of titles (after all, she was not exactly "shackled" by her obligation to serve out her term of office as governor.).
Howev, the point is excellent. There are other pursuits as deep and as meaningful as pursuing public office.
Kathryn Jean Lopez writes that Bill Simon began to "encounter the richness of his Catholic faith" about a dozen years ago. If that's the case, how did Bill Simon manage to miss the Church's teaching on the sanctity of life?
Bill Simon supported, promoted and, if I'm not mistaken, helped launch Rudy Giuliani's campaign for the presidency back in the 2008 election. Giuliani is a pro-abortion Catholic politician, a fact about which he makes no apologies. Bill Simon is a Catholic who supported him, a fact for which he made no apologies. I don't get why such a person warrants the fuss that KJL makes over him in this rambling article.