Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Iran’s Military-Industrial-Terrorist-Political Complex
The Islamic Revolutionary Guards soon could have nuclear weapons.

By Clifford D. May


Archive Latest RSS Send
Text  

In 1979, journalists and diplomats reported from Iran on a revolution against the shah. They were mistaken. The Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his followers were thinking bigger. Their goal was a global revolution — a revolution against the United States and other “oppressor” powers.

The ayatollah famously called America the Great Satan. This, too, was misunderstood. His intention was less to insult than to describe: He knew that freedom, the rule of (man-made) law, peace, and equal rights for both the servants and enemies of Allah are seductive ideas that could subvert the truths and laws revealed by the Prophet as interpreted by him. Promoting such ideas is what makes America Satanic.

Advertisement

With this in mind, Khomeini moved quickly to establish a militia, the Sepah-e Pasdaran-e Enqelab-e Eslami, the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution, also known as the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps  (IRGC). It was designed to be the clerical regime’s “sword and shield against domestic opposition forces,” writes Emanuele Ottolenghi, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (the policy institute I head) in his timely new book, The Pasdaran: Inside Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Owing allegiance only to Khomeini — who assumed the title of Supreme Leader, “God’s shadow on earth” — the IRGC grew into “a vital instrument of Iranian foreign policy,” promoting Islamic Revolution beyond Iran’s borders. The Quds Force, its “special branch dedicated to operations abroad,” became the point of the spear — organizing the assassination of the regime’s enemies; financing, training, and sponsoring terrorist groups including Hezbollah, its Lebanon-based proxy, Shiite militias in Iraq, and Hamas in Gaza; and providing assistance to both the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

The Guards and their subsidiaries, Ottolenghi notes, are “directly involved in all phases of the oil supply chain.” They run legitimate businesses and front companies that enable the regime “to gain access to foreign technology that Iran cannot yet produce indigenously.” They are involved in international drug trafficking, particularly out of Afghanistan, and they collaborate with organized crime, not least in Latin America.

Increasingly, former IRGC commanders have moved into powerful political positions within Iran. Most ominously, this military-industrial-terrorist-criminal-political complex now supervises Iran’s nuclear-weapons development and ballistic-missile programs.

Last week, the Revolutionary Guards were implicated in a terrorist plot targeting the Saudi ambassador and anyone else who happened to be in or near a posh Washington, D.C., restaurant that was to be bombed while he was dining. Among the key characters involved are Mansour Arbabsiyar, an Iran-born American citizen, his cousin, senior Quds commander Abdul Reza Shahlai, his deputy, Col. Gholam Shakuri, and a Mexican drug trafficker who, it turned out, was working undercover for U.S. authorities.

Had the plan succeeded, it would have appeared to be the work of a Mexican drug cartel — though Iran’s rulers, their friends, and some of their enemies, would have known better.

Instead, the operation failed and, as Iran’s terrorist masters undoubtedly expected, many experts have been quick to voice skepticism about whether the Quds Force could be behind such “recklessness,” and to suggest that perhaps this was a “rogue operation” lacking approval from Khomeini’s successor, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Ottolenghi considers that nonsense, emphasizing that the Guards “respond to the leader’s orders, and do not take such daring initiatives to undermine him.”

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Will Fear Decide Texas Senate Race?

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST



COMMENTS   5

EXPAND  

   10/20/11 08:05

His advisers must be biting their tongues?? His two closest advisers are Valerie Jarret and Susan Power. It was those two chuckle heads that talked him into the Libyan adventure using the, Responsibility to Protect Doctrine nonsense. Otherwise, a very enlightening piece.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 10:12

Radical Islam is an existential threat to the United States and the West in general. I did not come up with that idea. Some think tank did not come up with that idea. Radical Islam came up with that idea and has published it repeatedly in various books, manifestos, blogs, etc. They have shown through their violent actions that they are not just blustering.

Carter should have crushed Iran during the hostage crisis but did not. And I do mean crush. Full, all out war on them. Would have saved that world a lot of pain over the last 30 years. Would have saved Iran a lot of pain as well I think but quite frankly that is a secondary consideration.

That war with Iran will come. The terms of how it comes will be the variable.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
complete curmudgeon
   10/20/11 10:25

Timidity has brought us to these dire straits. Just as it did in the 1930's. An unwillingness to do something effective even if it was ugly.

but here we are. It seems to me that the biggest mistake America has made is the insistence on following Europe's lead when dealing with these rogues. "Soft power" as peddled by the likes of Javier-Solana is a joke, an oxymoron.

Power, as people viscerally understand it, is the ability to do whatever, with impunity.

Sadly, the evidence that our government(s) have failed us dramatically continues to mount.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 12:06

I really wonder how this administration defines "rogue?" Especially when there are so many incidents/actors joined by the common thread of radical Islam? But somehow, to the left, there is no collective roguishness; just individual rogues and solitary actors. Of course, it cannot be that radical Islam, which inspires them all, is a murderous and roguish ideology....

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
David E. M. Thompson
   10/21/11 22:06

Mr. May is correct.
The first four comments here are all correct.
I'm sad that there are only four of them (at 9 PM, 21 Oct). Articles on the budget and the Presidential election attract a hundred or more.
Can we HOPE that Obama will connect with his inner warrior and send a fleet of Predators to negotiate with Iran's leaders? That would be CHANGE I'd believe in.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact