Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Can Cain Do It?
He’s running a non-traditional campaign.

By Robert Costa


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

As Herman Cain rises in the polls, Beltway Republicans are wondering whether he is running a “serious” campaign, complete with bustling staffers, field organizers, and national money raisers. His recent bus tour around Tennessee and northern Virginia, hawking his latest hardcover, has only increased chatter about his efforts in early primary states, which appear lackadaisical.

But behind Cain’s bookstore stops, his political team is building — just not in usual frontrunner fashion. Instead of betting the campaign on Iowa, or another winter primary, his small team of advisers is attempting to play nationally, using Cain’s ubiquity, on the airwaves and the Internet, to boost his candidacy.

Advertisement

With 75 days until the Iowa caucuses, sustaining a top-tier candidacy with media attention, debate fireworks, and online donations is risky. But Cain’s operation is confident in its strategy. They say their deep experience in grassroots advocacy, often outside of party lines, will sustain the campaign.

Cain’s senior staff, to be sure, is more than a band of amateur enthusiasts. Most are veterans of Americans for Prosperity, an influential group with close ties to tea-party leaders and high-profile donors, such as Charles and David Koch. AFP, in many respects, launched Cain as a national conservative figure in 2005, when it tapped him as a spokesman — and he has benefited from the association.

As he traveled the country, championing AFP’s free-market principles, Cain developed relationships with strategists who lacked reputations in Washington but had extensive experience elsewhere, especially in Midwestern conservative circles. Mark Block, Cain’s campaign manager, was one such operative (and has been the brains behind Cain’s White House hopes). Another is Linda Hansen, Block’s deputy.

To top GOP consultants, the Cain-Block alliance has been astonishing to watch, not only because it has worked, but because of the differences between them. Cain, a charismatic African-American businessman, had eyed a presidential run for years but had few political prospects as a relatively unknown talk-radio host from Georgia with a failed Senate primary run under his belt.

Block, then directing AFP’s Wisconsin chapter, saw things differently. He told Cain last year that if they took an alternative route to the nomination — stoking buzz instead of buying it — they had a shot. Cain, in his mid-60s, a long business career finished, agreed. Sources inside the campaign say both men remain true believers in that mission.

Indeed, there is a bond there, sources say, more than employer-employee. Block, once a rising star, was looking for a professional comeback of sorts, a few years after he was fined for campaign violations in Wisconsin. Cain, for his part, was seeking to join the national conversation, not merely disappear into political history as the Man Who Once Challenged Bill Clinton. (Cain, then chief executive officer of Godfather’s Pizza, famously challenged Clinton during a health-care forum in 1994.)

But Cain’s crusade is about more than green rooms or final career laps. And his autumn rise, campaign insiders insist, has not been sudden, or a lucky side effect of Cain’s charisma. Sure, other candidates have risen and fallen, and the Georgian could easily do the same, but Cain confidants bet he can last, due to the way the campaign was built and continues to be run — with catchy policy proposals and guerrilla maneuvers.

All spring, for example, Block used AFP tactics to build Cain’s campaign, emphasizing name-identification and messaging first, and running field operations on a shoestring budget. By late May, days after Cain officially joined the race, the work paid off. Using social media, outreach to conservative media, and appearances at tea-party rallies, Cain began to gain. Gallup’s May survey of GOP voters showed him with the highest “positive intensity score” in the field.

Cain’s poll numbers have fluctuated since, but his campaign has doggedly stuck to its original strategy, shrugging off its thin staffing as it works to keep Cain visible. J. D. Gordon, the campaign’s spokesman, says that the campaign will not shift its main focus to Des Moines or Manchester. But do look for Cain to make more early-state stops, now that he’s attracting more nationwide support — and has wrapped up the book tour. “We already have field staff in twelve states,” Gordon says. “And we’re launching in more states soon. We’re looking to spend more time in Iowa and New Hampshire.”

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Will Fear Decide Texas Senate Race?

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST



COMMENTS   112

EXPAND  

sickofrinos
   10/20/11 06:46

If a rino like Scott Brown can raise the money he did. Mr. Cain has a prayer.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 07:52

The left bleats endlessly about exorcising the influence of money in politics to ostensibly bring clarity and cleanliness to the process. Herman Cain has the conviction and a clear message that connects with real Americans who recognize the nation is on the brink of "fundamental change". Mr. Cain is successful on a slim budget because real people committed to saving our country from Constitutional destruction will engage in this fight with someone they percieve truly belives in the Founding Principles. Meanwhile, Mary Matalin continues her "political hedging" business with partner James Carville and the NPR acolytes who ought to be championing a Herman Cain model instead show their Alinsky allegiance and fundraise for Obama.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
FL fan
   10/20/11 08:41

Right on! Herman is like a Founding Father who presents himself in the service of the Nation - not someone trying to make a career out of it. I admire him so much and will do what I can to promote him.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
rick3262@gmail.com
   10/20/11 07:54

Hermie doesn't have the experience. I admire the guy. If he won, I imagine Newt Gingrich would become his VP or vice versa. I'd love to see him debate Obama, but am afraid that the MSM would literally lynch him and blame the Tea Party.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 08:49

Great comments, Iron.

And, isn't it refreshing to see the message outshine the established "road" to the nomination? Cain's transparency and positive message resonates with voters, and the polls prove it. And his campaign machine demonstrates his abililty to run things efficiently and effectively. This man will make a GREAT executive.

After Gov Romney's childish (i.e. "un-presidential") antics and whining in Vegas, Cain will hopefully begin to build and cement a lead in the field.

Go Cain!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
HankRearden
   10/20/11 08:48

“Cain can bypass the traditional channels,” Plakon says. “And he’s doing it at a lot lower cost, having folks go from neighbor to neighbor. In the age of social networking, that’s invaluable.”

As the American taxpayer is saddled with a $15 trillion national debt and $1.5 trillion annual deficits, one might expect the conservative establishment to sit up and take notice of a leader who is building a winning campaign with a fraction of the amount of fundraising of his competitors.

Cain represents a return to bold, unabashed, unapologetic conservatism. Americans instinctively understand this, even if the Republican/conservative establishment does not.

Now R. Perry is said to unveil a flat tax. Can Romney be far behind?
GO HERMAN CAIN!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 mnjg
   10/20/11 08:57

Do not underestimate the CRAZIES who are always hungry for the RED MEAT rhetoric and Cain the TALKER gives them plenty of it. They do not care that he has no governing record to judge him with, they do not care that he was not tested in any elected office, they do not care that he has not enacted any public policy, they do not care that he not voted on any policy, they do not care that his 9-9-9 tax plan is insanity, they do not care that when he says something stupid (a daily occurrence) he either says that he was joking or he did not mean it or we misunderstood him or he misunderstood the question. All what they care about is that Cain the TALKER is giving them a lot of red meat bumper sticker rhetoric and they love him for this.
Yes the CRAZIES can give the nomination to Herman Cain.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 09:13

I wouldn't call myself or others like me a crazie. I just have faith in Conservative values and Conservative principles. And Cain has lived a lifetime of them.

To me, and it appears to at least 26% of other Republican voters, that matters more than how many elections or governemnt positions a person has held. If the Conservative values and principles are there, you can put that person in any position you want and you will see outstanding results.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Tom_S
   10/20/11 09:43

Adding to that, while Cain doesn't have experience in government he has plenty of experience as an executive in turn-around situations and to me that looks stronger than the records of either front-runner governor.

I support Cain because I think he's the one most likely to excel should he get the job.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 09:24

Respect and adherence to the Founding Principles over glitz and money from establishment stalwarts is neither crazy nor red meat. Mr. Cain has a genuine pedigree in problem solving while party favorites such as Mr. Romney have cushy backgrounds and creepy political baggage.

Perhaps you should check the functionality of your caps lock key. It appears to be sticking abnormally.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 09:32

Mr. Kettle, are you calling me a pot?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 11:17

I thought this article was about Herman Cain, not Obama.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 11:56

I guess that's why we're called Cainiacs.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/20/11 09:05

999 will be his undoing. Too many people (rightly and wrongly) will decide that this plan will raise their taxes.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Confounded Scoiety
   10/20/11 14:04

Based on what? Herman Cain now has 4 weeks to explain 999 to the people in more than just 30 seconds. Everyone who calculates the taxes themselves will see that they will pay less under 999. Every critic of the plan so far has been discredited within days.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
kenberthia
   10/20/11 09:14

Cain's 999 is so flawed and he refuses to say anything other than "read my plan, it's on my website".

Specifically, labor costs are no longer deductible which RAISES the after tax cost of labor considerably. IE if you company pays you 100K now, their CASH COST is 65% of 107.5K or 70K. Under Cain's plan it would be 100K. He actually says that the company would give you back their 7.5K FICA contribution too. Why would they do that?

So if companies after tax cost of labor rises 50%, why would you think prices would decrease? And wouldn't you think they'd rather buy a finished good from overseas (which is 100% deductible) rather than have labor non-deductible here?

This won't be addressed by Cain or the cainiacs. Somehow in the general this will be raised and it will finish him off. They'd be lucky to get 40% with him.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Marty Lund
   10/20/11 13:23

More of the same regurgitated lies sponsored by people who want to preserve this horrible tax code they exploit.

Currently the government takes a little over 22% of every dollar you pay for the final price of a good or service in Embedded Taxes. 9-9-9's business tax set-up reduces that number to 9% or less. 9% (or less) Embedded Taxes + 9% sales tax is 18%. 18 is less than 22.

Labor costs aren't deductible under 9-9-9 and they ~shouldn't~ be. 9-9-9 eliminates the Payroll Tax (7.65%) that the Employer used to pay on labor. Something has to replace it. Instead of a Payroll Tax that encourages outsourcing and a 35% tax on profits that businesses dodge by creating fake "labor" and "I.P. licensing" fees to subsidiaries (see "Google"), they pay a 9% tax on all the mark-up on a good and service, less capital investments - the mark-up that covers labor, overhead, and profits.

9-9-9 kills the stupid "double Irish" tax dodges and other tax-avoidance measures taken by companies like GE and Google and instead frames an alternate to our existing system that punishes businesses from buying U.S. goods, employing U.S. workers, or making capital investments in their company.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
LukeS
   10/21/11 08:14

Finished goods from overseas ARE NOT 100% tax deductible. Also, all imports are subject to the same taxes as American goods. For businesses, US made materials going into their product are tax deductible, but once again imports are not deductible. Also, US exports are NOT taxed. What all of this means is that there will be increased demand for American made products. US companies will want them for the tax deduction and the same goes for foreign buyers Seinfeld our exports will be cheaper without the taxes. This increased demand for "Made in the USA" products will result in more jobs to keep up with the demand.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
foreman
   10/20/11 09:24

I love that he is a political outsider. Cain is real. People can see it. They can feel it down to their toes. He's the funny, optimistic, encouraging leader we all want.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
MSP
   10/20/11 09:30

Here's how not to connect with potential supporters.

Cain was supposed to be on a Club for Growth conference call yesterday. He joined the call 45 minutes late, didn't apologize, took 3 questions and then had to go.

It's a novel way to run a campaign, but I doubt it will be successful.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact