Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Breaking the cycle, &c.

Impromptus by Jay Nordlinger


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send
Text  

Someone in the Arab world has to break the cycle. Here I borrow a page from my colleague, friend, and hero David Pryce-Jones. Somebody’s got to break the cycle. What cycle is that? You know: The ruler comes in by murder and he goes out by murder. He gains power by murdering and he loses power by being murdered.

We have seen it a lot in the Arab world, and we’ve just seen Qaddafi cut down in the street. I’m glad the gaudy old monster is gone. I’m especially glad he isn’t ruling over anyone anymore. But we could have used a bit of Nuremberg: What about those thousand or so prisoners you murdered in the courtyard, Moammar? What about Lockerbie? Etc.

Rotation — orderly, bloodless, humdrum rotation — in office. One of the many gifts we perhaps take for granted.

For DP-J’s superb note on Qaddafi’s demise, go here.

Advertisement

I’ve quoted to you before what Jimmy Carter said in 2009 on receiving an award from the PLO: “I have been in love with the Palestinian people for many years.” He has been far less in love, of course, with the Israeli people, and with Jewish people in general.

Most of us fall in love with individuals. I believe it’s true that Carter fell in love with Palestinians as a class. I think his love is not pure, however, because I think it comes from, or at least is fed by, his hatred of the Israelis.

I thought of Carter’s love when I observed the Palestinians’ celebration of the return of their 1,027 terrorists in exchange for the soldier Shalit. Of all the peoples in the world, the Palestinians can be very hard to love.

Of course, we also must recognize that they have been lied to, by their leaders and propagandists, their entire lives. They have been betrayed by their politicians, capos, and intellectuals — Edward Said, for one (a big one).

I have a memory from the contra-aid debate, many years ago. Polls showed that a majority opposed contra aid. Sen. Charles Grassley, the Iowa Republican, said something like, “If all I knew about Nicaragua came from the mainstream media, I’d oppose contra aid too.” I loved him for that.

Back to Professor Said for a minute: I have once or twice quoted Paul Johnson, who called him a “malevolent liar and propagandist, who has been responsible for more harm than any other intellectual of his generation.”

Nice goin’, Ed.

There are two sides to Joe Biden — at least two sides. One is the jovial pol who’s a little bit goofy. Then there’s the nasty piece of work who says that, if you don’t pass the Obama administration’s latest stimulus, you’ll have rape and murder on your hands.

Which Joe is the “real Joe”? I have always thought Biden was nastier than most people gave him “credit” for. Of course, I watched the Bork hearings. The job they did on Bork was one of the most disgusting things I have ever seen in my entire life.

And the judge is one of the more impressive people you’ll ever meet. Great sense of humor, for one thing.

The presidential election next year ought to be a field day for Republican ad makers. The material is so rich. Let’s have a statement from Biden: “In my wildest dreams, I never thought it would work this well.” He was talking about the 2009 stimulus that poured so much of our money down a rat hole.

Another ad? I noted this in a Thomas Sowell column the other day: “Like so many people, in so many countries, who started out to ‘spread the wealth,’ Barack Obama has ended up spreading poverty.” Yes, statists and collectivists are pretty good poverty-spreaders.

Maybe “Joe the Plumber” should appear in an ad? He’s the commoner whom Candidate Obama — soon to be King Barack — rebuked in 2008. Remember what he said? He said, in essence, he was going to “spread the wealth around.” How has that worked out for the country (not to mention Joe)?

Last time out, Oprah Winfrey proclaimed Obama, rather dramatically, “the one” (I’m not sure whether that “o” should be capitalized). Let’s have that clip in an ad, followed by “I don’t think so” or some such remark. Louis Farrakhan proclaimed Obama the Messiah, as in, “When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.” Again, I don’t think so.

The minister is not too high on Obama now, given the NATO war against Farrakhan’s friend Moammar Qaddafi (someone admired by the president’s ex-pastor, Jeremiah Wright, too). Still, Farrakhan in an ad, hailing Obama as the Messiah, would be great.

Hang on, got one more, for now: Susan Sarandon. The timelessly beautiful actress said of Obama, “He is a community organizer like Jesus was, and now we’re a community and he can organize us.”

How’s that workin’ out, y’all?

I was reading a dispatch from Tom Gross yesterday, and pondered this paragraph:

Following a previous earthquake in Turkey, an Israeli rescue team pulled a 10-year-old girl from the rubble after she had been trapped for nearly 100 hours. The Israelis rescued 11 other people alive and recovered 140 bodies. But now Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan refused an Israeli offer of help following yesterday’s devastating earthquake in Turkey.

Allow me to quote from an Impromptus in January 2010:

As you may have read, Israel has played a big role in relieving Haiti, following the hugely destructive earthquake. Unfortunately, the Israelis have a lot of experience in digging people out of rubble, etc. They are a people who have faced bombings over and over. At the end of 2003, there was a major earthquake in Bam, Iran. (Yeah, I know: “Bam,” an earthquake.) The Israelis were alacritous: They wanted to send rescue workers immediately. There was no time to waste, and Israel was very close, physically, to Iran. But Iran refused this aid and expertise. The government preferred that people die rather than suffer the ignominy of being rescued by Jews. This episode was a further indication of the psychosis prevalent in the Middle East. Fortunately, Haiti, for all of its sufferings, does not suffer from that.

Yes, Haiti is one up on someone, somewhere, in some fashion. Haiti saner than Turkey, as well as the mullahs’ Iran? It would seem.

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Will Fear Decide Texas Senate Race?

Symposium: Polling Life

Malkin: Obama’s Land of the LOST



COMMENTS   26

EXPAND  

paul devereaux
   10/25/11 06:17

Here's my ad - delivered by Herman Cain, even if he isn;t the nominee. Cain with two pizzas, a large and a small, pizza cutter in hand. Do you want the Democratic pizza, which is always a small and who gets a piece and what size is determined by some bureaucrats in Washington, or do you want the Republican pie, where we provide the ingredients and the size of your pizza is limited only by your imagination.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 10:20

Fabulous Idea! Great mental images.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 08:40

Two comments on the Language section.

One, I hate to break it to the young lady, but 'all teenagers' most certainly do not discuss the Oxford Comma. I fear she's in a vanishingly small minority there. Would that it were not so.

Two, for some reason, the juxtaposition of 'strippers' with either JFK or Joe Stalin is not a non-sequitur to me. I could be wrong, but my guess is both of the latter had ample experience with the former.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 10:17

"One, I hate to break it to the young lady, but 'all teenagers' most certainly do not discuss the Oxford Comma."

Indeed! I was three decades past my teens before I ever encountered the term "Oxford Comma."
Though I'd discussed the usage of commas in lists a bit earlier. With teachers, not teenagers.

I am a bit surprised, though, that a person would choose to consult Mr Nordlinger about punctuation. Although his writing is most enjoyable to read, his punctuation style is distinctive to the point of distracting. (He uses dashes more than any five other writers combined.)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
RGFinch
   10/25/11 13:13

"As all teenagers do" was tongue-in-cheek. It's amazing how hard it is for people to pick up sarcasm in written English.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 13:48

Please keep using the dashes, Jay. Many of us love your Impromptus style. It is like a personal conversation with you. I hope NR is not the publication that is straitjacketing you. But we are curious as to which one is! Can you let us know the secret?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/26/11 16:00

Agree about the dashes. Love dashes!

They're indispensible for conveying the give and take of a conversation or event.

Yes - the very well-written young lady was having a bit of fun with the 'all teenagers' bit - had to smile at that.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 17:17

Speaking of dashes, I suggest this "I invited the strippers - JFK and Stalin". The dash is a very underused mark. As to whether the period goes inside or outside the quotation mark, that's another story. I have always perferred outside when not actually quoting what someone said.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 08:52

What would you have done with the sentence, "I invited the strippers, Roy Cohn and J. Edgar Hoover"? Oxford comma or not?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Annie G.
   10/25/11 09:09

In my 66 years, the Oxford comma has gone in and out of fashion.

(I suspect that textbook publishers and the MLA are in collusion to change things up now and then to force college students to buy revised editions. When I was teaching, the publishers put out "new editions" of the grammar handbook every two years. As if!)

Adding a comma for clarity is always "in style."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 09:09

Thanks, Jay! This column always makes me smile, but Richard Gere, not so much. I know he stands up for Tibet and all, but when he admonished the firefighters after 9/11 for not wanting a non-violent response, I vowed to never watch another thing he was involved in.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 09:56

I was taught, by the Irish Christian Brothers, to use the Oxford Comma when presenting a list of 3 or more items and not to use it when the list is only two. I've found that somteimes the list of three includes a grouping of two or more (as in the left, the right, and Frank and Joe) and leaving it out in those circumstances makes for much clearer sentences.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bulldog 82
   10/25/11 10:19

Jay, I thought that WE had broken the cycle in the Middle East. Saddam was captured, tried, convicted, and then executed (did I get the comma correct?).

Sent to your room without dessert? Be careful what you sign up for. They might be having ice cream!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Charlie Davis
   10/25/11 11:34

Re: Haiti Has Israel had a continuing involvement with Haiti beyond helping rescue people from the rubble? If so, that might make a great article for the magazine.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 12:57

I always thought the classic comma joke was "Let's eat, grandma." vs "Let's eat grandma."

And don't forget the policy of this administration to China. "Who cares about human rights when there's money to be made!"

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 13:24

It's a pretty trivial point, but I have never considered Susan Sarandon "timelessly beautiful." There has always been something "unsexy" about her.

From Rocky Horror to to Witches of Eastwick (she *really* suffered next to Cher and Michelle Pfeiffer in that. That's some serious competition -- this was back when Cher's face was made of skin, not plastic, of course), to Bull Durham to her more current work, I always found something off-putting about her.

She never did it for me. I don't know why. Maybe it was the inner ugliness leaking out.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/26/11 00:31

I've never thought she was at all beautiful, even considering the exterior only. But Jay seems to appreciate female pulchritude of many kinds and to apply extremely generous standards, which is rather charming of him.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 13:34

I always get a kick out of seeing "parental unit" in print. To think that the Coneheads had such an influence on the language.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 13:43

I am a big fan of the "Oxford comma", but I was unaware it had a name. I edit and compile a church newsletter and bulletins, and I am always adding that little fella. To me, a series just feels incomplete without it.

What trips me up every time is that lovely line in an obituary about the deceased's living relatives: "his daughters, Mary, and husband Joe; and Jane, and husband Jon; his sons, Clyde, and wife Myrtle; Benji Bob, and wife Glynnis; and Beauregard; grandchildren, ..."
All those commas and semi-colons, sigh...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   10/25/11 14:06

Jay:
"I find myself having to 'write around' this..."

Today's composition exercise: Practice writing-around "myself."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact