One of the largest landslide elections in the history of the United States took place one year ago today. Free-market Republicans, riding a wave of public anger at bailouts, stimulus, and big-government programs, swept into power, capturing 63 seats and control of the U.S. House of Representatives, not to mention six U.S. Senate seats and over 675 state-legislative seats all over the country — with control of 21 state legislative chambers shifting to GOP hands. It was a truly historic landslide that the American people rightly expected would put an end to the Obama agenda that had been fundamentally transforming America before our eyes. Politicians and pundits alike looked on in awe. But one man was unconvinced: Barack Obama.
The day after the election, Obama held a press conference to spin the meaning of the historic landslide. He explained: “I think we’d be misreading the election if we thought that the American people want to see us for the next two years relitigate arguments that we had over the last two years.”
Advertisement
Obama’s message: He would push forward undaunted, stretching the limits of federal power into every aspect of our private and commercial lives. Only now, having lost Congress, he would do so by sidestepping Congress and stretching executive authority beyond all limits. Ironically, Obama had been a frequent critic of Bush’s abuses of executive power on the 2008 campaign trail.
Consider, from that same day-after press conference, how Obama answered a question about what would happen to cap-and-trade, his signature plan to bankrupt the coal industry and make energy prices skyrocket. This was the day after dozens of House Democrats had been defeated largely because of their support for the bill, which died without even being considered in the Senate. Obama said: “Cap-and-trade was just one way of skinning the cat; it was not the only way. It was a means, not an end. And I’m going to be looking for other means to address this problem.”
Indeed, the EPA has moved forward with a multifaceted regulatory onslaught to accomplish the ends of cap-and-trade by different means. While some of that onslaught has slowed down to dissipate the political consequences of such economically painful policies, several regulations are poised to move forward imminently with devastating effects on energy prices and American competitiveness.
Many other alphabet-soup federal bureaucracies have gotten into the act as well, with the union agenda notoriously moving forward at the NLRB and the FCC poised — unless the Senate can step in and stop them — to begin regulating broadband Internet access later this month for the first time in a decade.
Worst of all, Obama spent much of the past week not using the anniversary of his electoral shellacking to reflect on what the American people actually want, but to push even farther in the direction of larger, more intrusive government.
He announced that he would move forward on the bailout-and-stimulus policies of his failed jobs bill despite the fact that it was rejected even by the Democrat-controlled Senate — and even though the U.S. Constitution is crystal clear that Congress possesses the power of the purse.
His latest mortgage bailout — not dissimilar from the one that inspired the Rick Santelli rant and sparked the tea-party movement — will cost taxpayers at least $600 million and punish bond-market investors. His latest student-loan bailout will provide minimal, largely symbolic relief as an apparent reward to the Occupy Wall Street protest crowd — also at taxpayer expense. Both do violence to our Constitution and to democratic principles.
Obama says: “We can no longer wait for Congress to do its job. . . . So where Congress won’t act, I will.” Obama’s strategy is premised on the assertion that the American people want more government programs, more bailouts, and more stimulus spending — the opposite of what the historic 2010 landslide actually indicated. But stopping Obama’s reckless big-government schemes is precisely what the American people elected this current Congress to do.
It is Obama who insists on disregarding the will of the American people — and the separation of powers enshrined in our Constitution — in his effort to keep shoving the country hard to the left. If he persists, 2012 may be an even bigger landslide than 2010 was.
— Phil Kerpen is vice president for policy at Americans for Prosperity and author of Democracy Denied: How Obama is Ignoring You and Bypassing Congress to Radically Transform America — and How to Stop Him, available at www.DemocracyDenied.org.
Phil, your essay is fine, but it does not delve deeply enough. This is not Obama misreading the People's voice. Obama does not care what the People, or the Congress, think on these or any other matters. Rather, he is a modern Lenin, single-mindedly using all the power that he can take in order to transform America from a capitalist, freedom-loving dynamo to a European socialist-weenie state.
When looked at from this perspective, ALL of his actions, "mistakes" and policies mesh into a coherent whole. Why is this not apparent to all?
I was going to post pretty much the same thing. Although there was no real vetting of O prior to the 2008 election, everyone really knew what he was about. Enough had been disclosed. He has an agenda. Period. Election results don't matter to him. He has the pen and will use it as he so desires. Election results will only matter once he is removed from office. Fasten your seatbelt for that.
It's apparent to me, too. What this guy "is" has been apparent since Stanley Kurtz began his investigative writing in 2007about Obama's past. Obama has been acting like, and will continue to act like, the committed Marxist that he is.
I applaud your perpicatiousness Doctor, in light of that knowledge, Obama has been true to his word. Our national media politics is just theatrics to fool the masses.
Why SHOULDN'T he do as he pleases? He knows that America and, specifically, his political opposition is too terrified of his skin color and historical status to ever do anything about his extra-Constitutional methods.
Obama not listening?!? In other news, water is wet. Obama seems to be following the lead of a certain tone deaf Democratic Governor who has taking 'say one thing do another' to a new level ... External Link
Yes, it was Rick Santelli, on the floor of the Chicago Bond Market (I think) on CNBC -- amazed that the US Govt would be talking about bailing out under-water homeowners when the rest of us have been paying our bills all along -- remember, "Mr President, are you listening?" But I agree, Rick Santorum echoes his sentiments too
Gee, is anyone surprised?
Obama thinks he's the reincarnation of Lennin, (that's Vlad, not John), and he and his band of rouges is hell bent on destroying America.
We the people will dole out the proper punishment come next election.
Not only must we rid America of this socialist liar, but all other career politicians. Does anyone here think that many of our congress critters didn't have the resources to vent this fraud? They did, but, if they took action against him, it would lead to investigating them, which they do not want. It's taken them 50 years to set up the cushy lifestyles they lead, on our dime, and none of them will do anything to jeopardize that.
Imho, the 2012 election will be the most important in OUR nation's history. We the people MUST decide if America is worth saving. It's up to us to restore America to it's once great state because congress won't.
In order to be a socialist in the first place, one must have a certain ability to avoid the evidence provided to you by reality that your policies have never worked in the real world. Obama and his supporters in the bunker, are not able to be honest with themselves about what's happening. "Denial" ("Da-Nile") is not just a river in Egypt.
Obama has listened to the results of the last election. That is evidenced by his efforts to reach compromise with the GOP over many issues, only to upset his own supporters.
But also keep in mind, our founders did not want one election to swing the country's policies dramatically. That is why senators are elected for 6 years, the president for 4 and the house for 2 years. At any point in time, we have representatives from 3 electoral cycles, each reflecting the country's mood or issues at that time. Obama came in with his own surprising, near landslide that was in no way negated by the 2010 election.
Finally, we can all be better served if our public discourse leaves out the wild and unsubstantiated allegations, such as the president being an avowed Marxist, or " stretching the limits of federal power into every aspect of our private and commercial lives", or " his signature plan to bankrupt the coal industry and make energy prices skyrocket." If you are going to say things like that, put some facts behind it, otherwise lets have an honest debate about policies without all the hyperbole.