Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
The Ron Paul Factor
Organization and principle could yield a Paul victory in the Iowa caucuses.

By Robert Costa


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send Follow•   followers
Text  

Rep. Ron Paul rarely makes news, and his candidacy is frequently ignored by Beltway reporters. But headlines, his aides say, are overrated. In fact, the Texas Republican’s low-key autumn was strategic. As Paul’s competitors stumbled and sparred, he amassed a small fortune for his campaign and built a strong ground operation. And with January fast approaching, his team is ready to surprise the political world and sweep the Iowa caucuses.

“This was a movement when he first started running in 2008,” says Trygve Olson, a senior Paul adviser. “Now it’s turned into a highly professionalized campaign, but the energy from that last run is still there, and at the heart of what’s keeping up his momentum.”

The latest polls back up that confidence. In the influential Des Moines Register poll published over the weekend, Paul placed second. Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, captured 25 percent of likely Iowa GOP voters, but Paul garnered 18 percent, two points ahead of Mitt Romney, who in 2008 placed second in the caucuses.

Advertisement

If Paul wins Iowa, the upset could upend what many politicos say is a two-man race between Gingrich and Romney. According to state GOP insiders, a Paul victory is a real possibility. In background conversations, many say Paul is much stronger than outside observers believe, with deep and wide support among a frustrated electorate. With Herman Cain’s departure from the race, operatives see Paul potentially collecting a quarter of caucus attendees.

“Ron Paul is definitely for real out here,” says Tim Albrecht, the communications director for Iowa governor Terry Branstad, who has not endorsed any GOP candidate. “He is going to get 18 percent in the caucuses no matter what. If there’s a snowstorm, he’ll probably win, since he has such dedicated, passionate supporters. The question is whether he can move higher than that.”

Paul, for his part, thinks that he can close in on Gingrich, who has seen a recent bump in both state and national polls. “We’re getting pretty close to it being within the margin of error,” Paul told CNN on Sunday. “I think we continue to do what we’re doing. We’ve had the flavors of the month up and down so far this campaign. I’d like to think of myself as the flavor of the decade.”

Indeed, Paul’s consistency, his strategists say, is integral to his strength, especially in Iowa, where GOP voters have shuffled through an array of favorites. “Iowans, after testing Bachmann, after testing Perry, after testing Cain, and now Gingrich, are realizing that Ron Paul, all along, has been their candidate,” says Fritz Wenzel, Paul’s pollster. Unlike many primary fights, “this is becoming a race about principles,” he says, “and Ron Paul has stood up for true conservative principles for decades, not just in the last month.”

But campaign strategy, of course, has also played a major role in sustaining Paul’s poll numbers. The campaign combines a strong online presence, centered on volunteer organization, with prolific fundraising. Perhaps more important, however, is Paul’s “traditional” strategy in Iowa, which combines a heavy candidate presence with constant mailings and outreach.

“He’s run the most traditional caucus campaign of the year,” Albrecht says. “Multiple mailers, multiple ads, and multiple visits. Rick Perry has run ads, but hasn’t really visited. Mitt Romney has taken the shy approach, and Newt Gingrich hasn’t been here as often.”

“We’re following the traditional model because it works,” says Drew Ivers, the campaign’s Iowa chairman. “This is the fifth time I’ve chaired an Iowa campaign, and in this state, you can’t beat grassroots politics. The caucuses are like a business meeting. You don’t just come and vote; you go to participate. You need committed supporters; we have them.”

Steve Grubbs, who recently worked as Herman Cain’s Iowa director, has seen the enthusiasm for Paul up close. “I was driving down Interstate 80 two weeks ago and saw a hitchhiker carrying a Ron Paul sign. I didn’t pick him up, but I’m sure a Paul supporter gave him a ride,” he says. “I spot them everywhere, wearing their T-shirts and carrying signs.”

You’ll also find thousands of Ron Paul backers on the web — on message boards and on social-networking sites — talking about Paul and his criticism of U.S. foreign policy and the Federal Reserve. As Paul’s team invests in the ground game, it is taking care to intertwine its above-ground legwork with that web world. And it’s paying off, his advisers say, not only through donations, but in building a cohesive network of voters. An early example of its power came in August, when Paul nearly won the Ames straw poll, finishing a close second to Michele Bachmann.

“Ron Paul’s Internet operation is to Republicans in 2012 what Barack Obama’s Internet operation was to Democrats in 2007 and 2008,” Olson says. “It’s very grassroots and national, with thousands of very active supporters who spread the message in every state. That energy is the undercurrent to what’s happening on the ground, where people are going person to person.”

Still, even with the top-tier showing in Iowa polls and recognition by Iowa operatives of their on-the-ground prowess, Paul’s advisers aren’t taking anything for granted. In coming weeks, “Ron Paul is going to be living part-time in Iowa,” says Dimitri Kesari, Paul’s deputy campaign manager. The entire focus will be on coordinating turnout and stoking enthusiasm. Over 500 college students, for example, will move to Iowa over the holidays to participate in an initiative called “Christmas Vacation with Ron Paul.”

“He’s a different kind of candidate,” Kesari acknowledges, a “highly organized outsider.” But in January, he could also be a winner. And Iowans, at least, wouldn’t be surprised.

Robert Costa is a political reporter for National Review.

Text  

You Might Also Like...

Trinko: Cruz Reaches for a Runoff

Costa: How Hatch Wooed Palin, and the Right

Costa: Red-Hued New Jersey?

Trinko: For Mitt Romney, It’s 1994

Goldberg: Obama, Romney, and the ‘Social Market’

Klein: Romney and the Right



COMMENTS   22

EXPAND  

InsectG
   12/06/11 01:54

When you look at how Gingrich supported the TARP bailouts, socialized medicine, the military industrial complex and big govt which means higher taxes for you...then Ron Paul becomes the obvious logical choice. Ron Paul 2012 and 2016!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
specs
   12/06/11 09:53

I think the Gingrich-Toffler connection is a huge red flag as well:
External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/06/11 02:12

It sure would be nice to have someone consistently honest and thoughtful in the White House. Keep it up Ron Paul!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/06/11 02:30

Using his economic knowledge Ron Paul is the only statesman who predicted the economic crisis in detail in 2003 due to government policies: External Link 

Like Ron Paul his economic adviser, Peter Schiff, was mocked by a number of "respected" media talking heads when he predicted that the economy was in big trouble in 2006. They literally laughed at him and 2 million video views and years later who is laughing now? External Link 

Ignore the haters and status quo that got us into this mess. Ron Paul knows all about the government created economic crisis because he predicted it years in advance!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/06/11 02:48

Ron Paul 2012! Our last honest politician.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Chris Hey
   12/06/11 02:48

For what it's worth, it was just announced that Ron Paul won the Oklahoma straw poll.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/06/11 02:49

Ron Paul 2012!! - our last honest politician

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill7
   12/06/11 03:09

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness....

Ron Paul 2012!!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Luis
   12/06/11 03:32

Can't wait for Ron Paul, to take over, and win the nomination, and the presidency! I will support him ALL the way through! None of these other guys (and gal) have really won me over. Don't get me wrong, they're all OK candidates, but I honestly don't see them beating Obama in a 2012 election. RON PAUL is the only candidate I will ever support! Period.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/06/11 03:37

Ron Paul will win the Iowa caucus leading to the GOP nomination and then defeating Obama.

It's time to Restore America. Ron Paul 2012!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Nick Bradley
   12/06/11 10:02

No! We need a pseudointellectual non-conservative who uses big fancy adverbs to make people think he is smart.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/06/11 10:38

I have serious problems with Ron Paul's foreign policy stances, but I'm willing to give them a try, because I see that he is willing to consistently say the hard truths that we need to hear in our domestic policy, and above all I value his integrity. I truly believe that with Ron Paul, what we see is what we get. He has a long, consistent voting record.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Max Villeneuve
   12/06/11 14:38

I'd recommend reading his book "The Revolution", I was uneasy about Dr. Paul until I read that book.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
pdubya
   12/06/11 11:59

If you have issue with Ron Paul's foreign policy I suggest three things:

1. Interview any of the many active duty and veteran military that support Ron Paul in contributions. He receives twice more than all of the other republican candidates combined and 2/3 more than Obama.

2. Youtube "Mutually Assured Destruction vs. Mutually Assured Respect"

3. Read the Constitution - still the most modern form of government the world has ever experienced.

As a veteran, I fully support Paul's strong defense, non-interventionist and constitutional foreign policy.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
LiveFree1776
   12/06/11 13:19

For those who are still enamored of Gingrich, you better THINK AGAIN. If you look at his voting record and his real history rather than his rhetoric, you will find that the media image and the man do NOT match up.

He voted for NAFTA which weakened our borders with Canada and Mexico.

He voted for GATT which makes the US subject to the authority of the World Trade Organization.

He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations which is a group of influential people dedicated to globalization at the expense of America’s sovereignty.

His “Contract with America” was an empty marketing ploy; under his leadership (and with a majority in BOTH houses) spending increased as did the size of the federal government.

In 2007, he was spouting the virtues of Freddie Mac's business model while taking MILLIONS from the mortage giant to lobby their cause.

Also In 2007, he gave a speech at the Aspen Institute where he called the war on terror "phony", criticized the Bush administration and said we were losing the war and should get out.

Gingrich = Romney = Obama = Pelosi.

They are all corrupt traitors enriching themselves and their cronies at YOUR expense.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
chrisa
   12/06/11 14:12

| O look its that online presence you
| mentioned, kool.
|
\ /

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
mom
   12/06/11 14:52

Newt-he supported the Lebanese via a nice French man; he supports Israel via God only knows how many conduits...How can we trust someone who oils both sides of the wheels?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
mom
   12/06/11 14:57

.I want Newt's ties via a French man to Lebanon and his double-ties to Israel to be exposed. He is playing both sides of the fence!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
mom
   12/06/11 15:02

My Newt comments about his ties to French Lebanese "traders" did not appear on this site, but one cannot but understand that he is playing both the Lebanese and the Israelis...also, he is playing the Americans as dupes!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
mom
   12/06/11 15:12

AND Newt is definitely not as as pretty as Rhett Butler, who did the same thing in the Civil War in "Gone with the Wind".

But "Gone with the Wind" we are with Newt!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact