Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
The stench of ‘Occupy,’ &c.

Impromptus by Jay Nordlinger


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send
Text  

In southern Manhattan, the “Occupy” crowd tried to squat on private property, and were arrested. One of the occupier-squatters was quoted as saying, “We’re just trying to say that this country has gone in the wrong direction, and we need spaces that we can control and we can decide our future in, and that’s what this is about.”

Haven’t Communists talked like this, more or less, for generations? Is that too McCarthyite for you? Or just true?

Advertisement

I read a headline: “Occupy Boston Storms Israeli Consulate.” I thought, “It always comes down to the Jews, doesn’t it? So many grievances, so many extreme movements. It doesn’t take them very long before they get around to the Jews . . .”

Semi-frightening (and sometimes you need to drop the “semi-.”)

There were reports of a TB outbreak at Occupy Atlanta. A reader wrote me, “Brings new meaning to the idea of a consumption tax, doesn’t it?”

I know, I know: A classy column, one that repeats jokes about disease . . .

In the current issue of CityArts, I have a review of the new production of Gounod’s Faust at the Metropolitan Opera. The final paragraph reads as follows:

Just before the curtain rose following an intermission, a man in the audience started shouting, “Occupy Wall Street! Occupy Wall Street!” Some of the patrons cheered him on, saying, “Yeah, yeah!” Others booed. After a while, the man was shushed or evicted. He was more polite than the anti-Israel shouters in London: They shout at the Jerusalem Quartet or the Israel Philharmonic as the music is playing. This fellow did his shouting before the music began.

In recent weeks and months, there has been much talk about the question of Germany, and its place in Europe. The question of Germanness — what it is, what it isn’t; what it should be, what it shouldn’t be — is of course a very old and critical one.

I wish to quote some lines from Willy Brandt’s Nobel lecture, delivered in 1971:

I say here what I say in Germany: A good German cannot be a nationalist. A good German knows that he cannot refuse a European calling. Through Europe, Germany returns to itself and to the constructive forces of its history. Our Europe, born of the experience of suffering and failure, is the imperative mission of reason.

Egypt is a mess, and an alarming one. I was moved by something I read in a news article: “Egypt’s new interim prime minister broke into tears in front of journalists on Sunday as he spoke about the state of the country’s economy, saying it was ‘worse than anyone imagines.’”

That’s something, an Egyptian prime minister breaking down in public, for that reason. This goes way beyond Ed Muskie, or Pat Schroeder, or John Boehner . . .

Huang Jinqiu, a Chinese writer and dissident, has been released after eight years in prison. So, how did it go for him? This report gives us a whiff of it:

According to reliable sources, Huang, while in prison, was transferred to the Liyang Psychiatric Hospital in Changzhou because he appealed his sentence and refused to kneel on one knee while speaking with prison authorities. After being returned to prison, he was placed in the strict supervision block, where he was subjected to torture and physical and verbal abuse, including beating, being shocked with an electric baton on his legs and mouth, having his toes crushed, and solitary confinement. During this period, he was forced to run 150 laps a day on gravel, and, when he could not run anymore, was dragged through gravel, which tore through his clothes.

The abuses and torture resulted in torn cartilage in both of his knees and torn ligaments in his legs. He developed traumatic arthritis and inflammation of the joints. At his worst moment, he was unable to stand to walk and lost some of his ability to care for himself. The prison hospital refused him treatment.

Just another of millions of cases in the country President Clinton used to call our “strategic partner.”

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Lowry: The Left’s Homegrown Terrorism

Sowell: Occupy and the Moral Infrastructure

Cooke: Occupying Wells Fargo

Cooke: San Francisco Tunes In and Drops Out

Bolduc: Can It, Nancy

Sowell: Education vs. Schooling



COMMENTS   57

EXPAND  

Raposa
   12/20/11 07:17

On the topic of "names and job", my son's doctor is Dr. Livingood, and our pastor is David Goodpasture.

If I'd chosen those as names in a fictional setting, people would think I was being too cute by far.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 07:42

External Link 

I always kind of liked Jackie Mason, and know I know why. I'm guessing he's not a "Happy Holidays" kind of guy...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 MAFV
   12/20/11 08:34

Thanks Mr. Nordlinger.

Great fun as always.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 08:48

Thanks for the Impromptus.

Re: Just another of millions of cases in the country President Clinton used to call our “strategic partner.”

Perhaps the former president was employing a euphemism for "strategic DNC donor."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Ampleforth
   12/20/11 09:00

I was discussing Leonardo with a chruch group one evening. Someone asked, "You talking 'bout Da Vinci or DiCaprio?"

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 09:11

“We’re just trying to say that this country has gone in the wrong direction, and we need spaces that we can control and we can decide our future in, and that’s what this is about.”

This is why we need to be at OWS protests....with recruiting booths. We tell this fine young man, "Well, welcome to the Republican Party. We feel the exact same way. Big Government helps no one. Sign here."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
cpayne
   12/20/11 09:17

Well, we do refer to William of Ockham as "Ockham." And it's pretty common to refer to Thomas Aquinas (Tomas d'Aquino) as "Aquinas."

But you're right about "The Da Vinci Code." Awful.

Merry Christmas from Craig of Ottumwa.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 11:42

"Well, we do refer to William of Ockham as "Ockham." "

Actually, I don't think I have ever referred William of Ockham unless it was in reference to his Razor (though it is spelled differently for some reason - must be the translation to or from German). But I guess that makes your point that it is not William's Razor.

Yes. Merry Christmas.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 15:10
Bulldog 82
   12/20/11 09:29

"Would you refer to William of Orange as “of Orange”?"
I just call him Bill.

"ESPN.com quoted Rene Gayo, “director of Latin American scouting for the Pittsburgh Pirates"
Do we have a "Director of European American Scouting"? How about one for "African Americans"? Why is everything so Balkanized?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Billy D
   12/20/11 10:32

Probably because a lot of baseball players come out of Latin America. I'm pretty sure "Latin American" is meant to describe the region, not some sort of ethnicity.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 11:03

Latin America is a place -- the nations of the western hemisphere where Spanish and Portuguese are the primary languages. It is a geographic distinction, not an ethnic one.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Alan J
   12/20/11 11:21

You're not a baseball fan, are you?

Can you find anywhere on a map that could be described as "European America" or "African America?" No?

Geno Rayo is not scouting kids of Mexican descent in California, Cubans in Florida, or Dominicans in New York. He's scouting players in Mexico, in Cuba (to the extent possible), in the Dominican Republic, and in Venezuela (and maybe a few other places).

Do you really think it so ridiculous to maintain a distinct operation to handle scouting in Latin American countries?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 19:51

It's the reason the Pirates have been so strong there since they stole Clemente away from the Brooklyn farm system. And really their only chance at making any kind of move in the NL East -- this is the lowest price talent.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/21/11 17:15

No, their only chance is robots out of Carnegie Mellon, or a new and undetectable steroid out of Pitt.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 11:27

I don't believe that he is the director for scouting players of Hispanic origin but rather the director for scouting people who are currently playing in Latin America--he's the guy who watches the baseball leagues in Mexico, Columbia, the Dominican Republic, etc. to see if they have anyone they want to recruit. It makes sense as a division of labor that would be done by a different guy than the ones watching American college players.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 11:36

"Latin American Scouting"

Its geographical. There are alot of players from Latin America. You might prefer to call it something else, but that pretty much gets the point across. There may be a European scouting contingent, but since there are so few baseball players from Europe it seems unlikely. There is probably an Asian scouting team as well just as there are probably geographical divisions among scouts in the US.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
K Kammeyer
   12/20/11 20:12

Q: What's William of Orange's middle name?
A: of.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Jacob R
   12/20/11 09:34

Would you refer to Thomas Aquinas and Thomas More both as Thomas?
What about Thomas Jefferson? We'd end up with a lot of Thomases!

Also why not Vincent instead of van Gogh? I really don't think there is an established convention. People just pick the name that sounds best.
(I am on board with any snipe against that demonic pile of trash, the Da Vinci Code!)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   12/20/11 10:01

I believe the point is that "da Vinci" is not really a last name, it's a descriptor ("of Venice?") used at the time to distinguish him from other Leonardos. So it's not equivalent to calling Vincent van Gogh just "Vincent." But your point is well taken that calling him simply "Leonardo" also seems insufficient. I would tend to follow the journalistic convention of using the full "Leonardo da Vinci" on first reference, and simply "Leonardo" thereafter.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact