Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Santorum in New Hampshire
He’s going over well ― but is he too late?

By Robert Costa


About Author Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send Follow•   followers

Rick Santorum in Keene, N.H., Jan. 6, 2012.


Text  

Manchester, N.H. — Rick Santorum was minutes away, zooming down Interstate 293, but the fire marshal at Belmont Hall, a banquet center, was already nervous. “Let’s move,” he said, eyeing reporters and Occupy protesters. “Everybody, go to the parking lot, and quick.”

Diners in the adjacent restaurant nodded approvingly; burly cameramen groaned and toted their heavy bags outside. Santorum staffers, unprepared for the audible, hustled out the door with the lectern, and were greeted by a pack of college students holding homemade signs, mostly reading “Google Santorum” and “Legalize Marijuana.”

As the crowd swelled, a pickup truck pulled up, and Santorum was surrounded as he jumped out of the passenger’s seat. With his gray sweater vest and dark jacket, he looked like a math teacher who had stumbled into a Phish concert, surrounded by grungy students and hecklers who immediately pestered him with questions about gay marriage, drugs, and the “99 percent.”

Advertisement

“Why won’t you debate me?” asked Vermin Supreme, a left-wing activist and perennial presidential candidate. As Santorum shook hands, Vermin Supreme repeatedly screeched the challenge into his bullhorn. Santorum squinted and shook his head. “You mind if I meet some constituents?” he asked.

Your constituents?” an onlooker asked, scowling.

“My potential constituents,” Santorum replied.

As he moved toward the lectern, the questions kept coming. “Is the gay-marriage issue hurting you here?” asked a reporter.

“I don’t think so,” Santorum replied. “We have a very strong record.”

The persistent Vermin Supreme followed. “Why won’t you marry me?” he yelled.

Santorum rolled his eyes. “Obviously you’re going to have protesters,” he said. And then he grinned. “We have a problem of having too many people coming to our events, and then having to bring them outside.”

Once Santorum had made his way across the asphalt, he clasped the lectern, looked down, and sighed. Because of the impromptu setup, there was no microphone. Vermin Supreme offered his bullhorn. Santorum narrowed his eyes as an audience member handed him the device, and kept his fingers far away from the mouthpiece. He set it on the table. “I don’t need it,” he said.

Watching the scene, a nearby journalist wondered: “Who advanced this event?”

A few minutes later, after Santorum had given his usual stump speech, focusing on his blue-collar roots and his plan to revive manufacturing, he opened the parking lot to questions. A group of college students with pro-marijuana signs hoisted one young man onto their shoulders; he stretched his hand into the air, desperate to be called on. “I certainly respect you putting up with all this,” one gentleman remarked to Santorum.

“What’s ‘this’?” Santorum asked. “Look, I come from southwestern Pennsylvania. I represented a district that had more steelworkers in it than any district in America.” He paused and glanced at the sign-wavers. “This is cake. When you’ve got steelworkers, that’s serious.”

But even Santorum, usually a placid, wonky presence, momentarily lost his politician’s poise as stragglers peppered him with questions and barbs. When more Occupy protesters arrived, however, he chuckled, amused at how his “town-hall meeting” had become a gathering place for angry progressives and local kooks. “This is a great venue; this is a slice of life,” he said. “This is like a Fellini movie.” The reference to the surrealistic Italian auteur drew laughs.

Yet the Manchester event, like many this week in New Hampshire, appears to have rattled Santorum and slowed his surge following the near-victory in the Iowa caucuses. After spending months in the Hawkeye State, where he was met at most stops by pensive evangelicals, he is no longer a fringe candidate. As happens with most poll leaders, however, the fringe now comes to him.

1   2   3   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

McCarthy: Christie Is Not One of Us

Trinko: Cruz Reaches for a Runoff

Costa: How Hatch Wooed Palin, and the Right

Costa: Red-Hued New Jersey?

Trinko: For Mitt Romney, It’s 1994

Goldberg: Obama, Romney, and the ‘Social Market’



COMMENTS   8

EXPAND  

   01/08/12 08:18

There's a name for candidates who can't adequately organize a press stop and who rely more on 'pluck than money' - soon-to-be former candidates.

Given the dearth of quality GOP competition this go-around, the choice this year is easy. Depressingly easy ... External Link 

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/08/12 10:55

They didn't hold him for ransom with nonnegotiable demands, or attack in force causing the police to intervene with shields and riot sticks, so I can only surmise these students are posers, or possibly in the hire of some Democrat overlord cutout. Are they all majoring in goldbricking?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/08/12 11:15

Outside of his Evangelical cocoon Santorum is proving to have absolutely no constituency whatsoever and if the GOP chooses to follow in his stead, neither will they.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/09/12 13:23

Santorum's nomination would fracture the party - just as much if not more so if he won (doubtful, but we can discuss it hypothetically) than if he lost. Big-Government conservatism - as bizarre as a mini-tar - can never again be allowed to rear its ugly head!
   
We can't take the embarrassment of W's 3rd term. Makes it too hard to be Republican in public. More importantly, the public treasury flat can't take that kind of abuse!!!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/08/12 12:17

Thank you for a nice report, Mr. Costa. I think it helps to read about the nitty-gritty of what it must be like to be a candidate at the "retail" level, not just hiding behind millions of dollars of T.V. ads.

And I have nothing but respect for Mr. Santorum, who is proclaiming the truth in the face of ignorance, and malice.

It reminds me a bit of Pope John Paul II's trip to Nicaragua, when Daniel Ortega's thugs tried to drown out the truth with noise.

Make no mistake: the truth will be heard; and Santorum has the courage to speak it.

May God speed him to at least a respectable showing on Tuesday. Can't expect any more than that, given the enormous ignorance up North.

(By the way, as a Southerner, I'm accustomed to hearing about the South, "It ain't the heat, it's the stupidity." Excuse, please, but we didn't send Ted Kennedy to the Senate for 40 years! Nor Hillary, nor Chafee, nor Biden, etc, etc!! Oh, yes, there were Bull Connor and George Wallace in the history of the South -- but I'd wager Kennedy and Biden and the lot of them were just about as malign an influence on our nation's direction as the worst of the Jim Crow idiots who used to run the South -- with the emphasis on "USED TO"!!)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Pennsylvania Ken
   01/09/12 13:25

You're aware, of course, that most of that ignorance and malice is coming from fellow republicans.

Democrats would love for Santorum to win the nomination. Who wouldn't want to run against an incumbent senator who lost his seat by 18%?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/08/12 20:24

As usual, the coverage is all about the horse race aspects and the distracting gay marriage issue. Nobody will ask Santorum how he buys a house for "$0" in pricey Northern Virginia from a trust which paid $2 million for it (30% over the assessment) a couple of years before. Nobody will ask him if he is getting homestead tax breaks on "primary residences" in two states at once.

Nobody will ask him how essential was it to borrow another $500,000 on the taxpayers' credit card to fund a polar bear exhibit at the Pittsburgh Zoo, or why he fought to retain the Davis-Bacon Act which increases the costs of every single federal project and gives unionized contractors an advantage over non-union ones.

No one asks him when he EVER voted against spending besides the doomed BBA. Nobody asks him how a K-Street lobbyist lawyer can be a "Washington outsider" when he didn't go back to PA after the Senate loss, but to Northern Virginia to stay close to the power center.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Mr. Mark
   01/09/12 01:08

Of, course...everyone who opposes Santorum's Comstock-Roosevelt platform must be a college student pothead and sympathizer with OWS and gay militants. Sure. Whatever you say.

If you knew me, believe me: There is no possible, conceivable, imaginable, plausible way that you could EVER confuse me with a college student, a liberal, or an OWSer. No possible way.

On some social issues, I assure you I'm to right of Mr. Santorum. But I'm also a big fan of the free market, competitive federalism, and the constitution.

Santorum's platform makes it clear that he does not share my enthusiasm for these things, and I know why that is. It's really very simple.

He has low intellectual capacity.

There's nobody up there running race fuel, but it's apparent from his positions on the issues that he's decidedly low-octane. You put that stuff in the presidential engine and you'll get some serious knock. I know this is harsh, but he's a Republican Biden.

The other candidates are worthless as well - yes, but at least they're smarter.

His economic views don't work. He neither understands nor cares about how a free market functions. He neither understands nor cares that protectionism and government meddling in an economy produces horrible consequences.

For example, look at a screwed economy. Take this one, right now, for instance. This Keynesian kleptocracy that we find ourselves in is the result not only of bad governance under Obama (and boy-howdy can he do some bad governing), but also the result of bad governance under Bush, Clinton, and all the way back to the New Deal.

Republicrats have been destroying this country since my grandparents were my age. New Deal & Social Security....end of the gold standard...governance by executive orders..."mandatory" federal spending ("Don't look at me, I just write the laws around here..there's nothing I can do...")...the NRLB...teacher's unions...bailouts (too BIG to fail!).

So we know (because the other candidates are horrible as well) that we're going to get (surprise, surprise - who woulda thought?) yet another underwhelming, embarrassingly bad excuse for a Republican nominee (seen this movie before?) but some candidates are even worse than the others.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact