Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
The Lioness in Winter
From the Jan. 23, 2012, issue of NR

By John O’Sullivan


Archive Latest RSS Send

Meryl Streep as Margaret Thatcher in The Iron Lady (The Weinstein Company)


Text  
‘The Iron Lady” — a term coined as a hostile criticism of Margaret Thatcher by the Red Army newspaper in 1976 — proved to be an accurate prediction of her impact in the Cold War. It is, however, an ironic and ultimately misleading title for this Meryl Streep portrayal of the last British prime minister to play a major role on the world stage as she lives in lonely retirement. A better one would have been The Lioness in Winter
 
For the film’s narrative is framed as a series of flashbacks in the memory of an elderly Lady Thatcher grieving over the death of her husband some years before. We first encounter her as a slightly confused old lady who, having escaped her police escort, is buying a pint of milk in a local store. She returns home to complain about its price to Denis, who is as lively in death as he was in life: He crops up regularly throughout the movie’s narrative of his wife’s political career to comment on her memories, her decisions, her ambition, her guilt, and her selfishness while she packs his clothes and other effects. When others are around, however, he conveniently disappears into the woodwork. Whether she is aware that “Denis” is a hallucination is never really clear — until the very end of the movie, when, all his belongings having been dispatched to a charity shop, he walks away into the next world, leaving his wife alone and bereft.
 
Several critics otherwise favorable to The Iron Lady have criticized this framing device as distasteful. To portray a living person, especially a distinguished stateswoman, as suffering from senile delusions is thought to be unpleasantly intrusive. That is a fair criticism. But it need not have been a disabling one if Denis’s commentaries had been kept within limits both of time and of taste. They are, however, almost the whole movie, or at least its central narrative theme. Actual historical footage of real events — the miners’ strike, the Falklands War — is little more than confirmation of Denis’s insights and observations. 
 
It matters greatly therefore who “Denis” is and what he says. He is certainly not the historical Denis Thatcher, who would have been alarmed at some of the remarks put in his mouth. He did not believe his wife was moved by ambition rather than duty (as he argues in one crucial scene) or that she was “always alone” rather than a full family member (as he says in his final appearance). The real Denis Thatcher told friends as early as the early 1960s — a few years after his wife entered Parliament — that she would be the first woman prime minister. He was inordinately proud and entirely supportive of her. 
 
He is presented here as the spokesman for the confused paradox at the heart of this film. It is an anti-feminist film insofar as it depicts Margaret Thatcher as the prototypical feminist career woman careless toward her family. And it is a feminist film insofar as it shows her defeating the massed ranks of prejudiced maledom to get to the top. 
 
This paradox itself rests on a mystery: How on earth did Margaret Thatcher get elected to the leadership of a Tory party here composed entirely of male chauvinists? The various scenes in which Mrs. Thatcher battles, triumphs over, leads, and is eventually betrayed by an all-male three-piece-suited chorus line of Tories are almost balletic in character, beautifully composed, flawlessly filmed, and aching to be set to music. They have some claim to symbolic truth as a description of her relationship with the patrician Tory “wets” who provided the top leadership of the party for much of her time in politics. But these scenes are absurdly false as a portrayal of rank-and-file Tories (who, among other things, are socially much more normal than depicted here) and of her rapport with them. Mrs. Thatcher was the Tory leader most comfortable with the grassroots party since Bonar Law (d. 1923). She was elected Tory leader almost entirely with male votes — but most of them male-backbencher votes. (We know the exact total of the male-chauvinist vote in that election; it was 16 — the number of MPs who voted for the other right-winger standing against Ted Heath, an aristocratic Hugh Fraser.) She soon established herself as the darling of the whole party. All of which means that if Denis Thatcher, a self-confessed Home Counties Tory, had been an unmarried MP at the time, he would have voted for her too.

1   2   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Auslin: Where Did the Land Go?

Birzer: A Different Kind of Progressive

Patterson: The Marvelous Avengers

O'Sullivan: The Significant ‘Little War’

Cooke: British Freedom of Speech Endangered

O'Sullivan: Exit the Archbishop



COMMENTS   20

EXPAND  

 RobL
   01/09/12 11:16

Of course it’s an entertaining, engaging movie with a riveting performance by Meryl Streep, that’s what scares me.

This is classic premeditated liberal ‘change the narrative’ propaganda.

Watch out…this movie will get all the awards; it will be played at all the middle schools. The wonders of an open-minded Hollywood will be glorified for eloquently and even handedly portraying an honest debate on conservatism and liberalism.

Of course, as you point out Mr. O’Sullivan it’s a completely biased presentation.

We are merely witnessing just another battle in the endless war to win liberal converts.

Departments of Education across the land will expose legions of children to this subtle but dishonest portrayal of conservatism. How it’s anti-people, anti-family, and merely an avenue for the ambitious to succeed. Poor conflicted Margaret Thatcher a women who succeeded against the old white male conservative establishment, her only mistake was that she chose conservatism as her avenue for ambition. She was a liberal feminist at heart undone by her ambition and greed. A great women but weak person, future girls should stand up to the Man but do it as a liberal, and the world will benefit. Yes our children will be teaching our grandchildren that if only Margaret Thatcher was a liberal…then she would have saved her family, England and the world…

This is the nature of the enemy we fight, brilliantly cunning and deceitful. Not only are they attacking conservatism from every angle, they will succeed in changing the historical narrative regarding one of Britain brightest lights while at the same time getting credit for being unbiased.

Be afraid…very afraid.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
OC Conservative
   01/09/12 15:18

I agree.
Is my recollection correct that many people today do not think JFK was killed by Oswald, because of Oliver Stone's movie?
So too will they change the remembered history of Lady Thatcher.
I'll wait for pay-per-view.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
SamuelCyrus
   01/09/12 16:36

Well said Rob L. Thank you.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/10/12 10:59

Indeed, bravo RobL.

I'm getting the sick feeling that this film's release is a set-up for HRC replacing Biden as the BHO running mate. In the disordered liberal mindset, HRC is Thatcher perfected.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Francesco Sinibaldi
   01/09/12 11:51

Gentle delight....

Often, in
your memory,
the sound of
a swallow
appears near
a white cloud
recalling the
youth.

Francesco Sinibaldi

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
astroglider
   01/09/12 16:02

It is socialism that is a mere conduit for malign ambition. That's not a tough sell on NRO but I think more and more folks are experiencing it for themselves. In any case, the profligate socialists cannot pay the bills, the final offense.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/09/12 21:09

“Sir Mark and Carol [twin sibs, children of Baroness Thatcher] are appalled..." [The Telegraph Jan. 10, 2012]. I'm a huge fan of Margaret Thatcher and her co-conspirators [Reagan & Pope John Paul II]. This Triumvirate changed the 20th Century like No Others in their generation. I'll wait for the authorized biography by Charles Moore, retired editor of Daily Telegraph, hopefully in my lifetime, but not in hers. [WSJ - What Would Thatcher Do? Dec. 17, 2011.]

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/09/12 23:57

I an grateful for the review, It is exactly how a leftist Hollywood would portray a (GASP!) conservative icon. I despise the Hollywoodites even MORE now.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/10/12 11:06

I don't care about the movie itself. However, I am sorry that a movie was made and the title role was given to a Hollywood liberal phony.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Charles Teachout
   01/10/12 15:43

Here Here! Rob L

The close resemblance of Meryl Streep's character to the Iron Lady is truly enough to sell millions of gullible watchers who never actually heard her speak or shared the principles she bravely espoused. Alas, we all know how fundamentally dishonest most of our history is, dominated by biased Liberal spokesmen. Here's another movie for the ash heap, however technically skilled its presentation might be.

I, for one, won't even wait for this one on pay per view.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/10/12 20:00

How, exactly, does "waiting for pay per view" express opposition to the fundamentally dishonest Hollywood slant in the movie? Is it more virtuous because you paid less? But still, you paid, they profited. Hollywood isn't interested in telling the truth about anyone who doesn't share its worldview. (Assuming it is ever possible to know "the truth" about another person's psyche.)

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/12/12 11:10

It's merely an expression. I tend to be even more emphatic. My usual line is that I'll wait for it to come onto PBS, in Japanese, subtitled in Braille. (ie. ain't gonna happen).

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
EccoLa
   01/10/12 23:45

I don't think we have any basis on which to blame the Left for this one. Has there been a fatwah issued against any conservative who develops/funds/produces/makes a movie about Margaret Thatcher? If we're not even fielding a team (and we aren't) we really have to stop whining about the Left and need to examine ourselves. WE have abandoned education, film/TV, new media, and pop culture in general to the Left. Are we idiots? Do we not read Gramsci? Do we not understand that capturing hearts and minds, passing on our culture/values/history/etc from one generation to the next is one of our seminal responsibilities?

I am deeply disappointed that a technically brilliant actor like Streep has been cast in a vehicle designed to denigrate Margaret Thatcher. OUR side should have stepped up and made such a movie, casting Streep for her acting chops, never mind her personal politics.

I despise the Left. I also think we are MUCH to blame for their enormous success of the past few decades. We sit on our thumbs and whine, when we could be out there fighting. Tough to fight when you don't even field a team. We have only ourselves to blame for that.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Dalton
   01/14/12 09:24
Paul DeWolf
   02/04/12 00:24

Conservatives will never win the war with liberals in artistic representations. The problem is that most of us conservatives would try to make the movie as accurate as possible and conservative views are generally boring. We generally wouldn't take "liberal" license to invent story lines to augment her life. Most people wouldn't appreciate how remarkable her accomplishments were with the bare truth.

Responsibility isn't very romantic or entertaining. Truth can be stranger than fiction, but there's a reason we make up stories and write fiction. Occasionally, conservatism can be portrayed creatively, but for the most part I think we just have to keep the attitude that this article takes - "yes, that was an interesting story/movie, but if you want to know the truth..."

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
socally mike 626626
   01/12/12 23:34

The real Greek chorus is how GB has denigrated her memory while living off her success. Upon arrival 10 years ago, some numbskull took a whack at her statue with a mallet... I'd start there...

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   01/15/12 18:59

While watching the film, it is sometimes difficult to get past the wonder of Meryl Streep's performance and remind oneself of the basic intellectual dishonesty that underlies the entire project. Another painful reminder of the price we conservatives pay when the liberal elites control our airwaves and movie screens. When a well crafted movie emerges to celebrate the traditional virtues of self reliance, charity, and moral certitude (e.g., The War Horse), do your fellow conservatives a favor and pay to see it.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Patrick Carrroll
   01/16/12 11:18

I saw the movie yesterday and left with a sort of queasy feeling of having been given a lot of content without context.

The film, for example, brushes lightly over what an economic basket case the UK had become by the end of the 1970s. Arthur Scargill is not mentioned, nor the mayhem and murder committed by his thugs. To watch the movie, you'd get the impression Mrs Thatcher felt like picking a fight, and the miners were a handy target.

The Cold War ends with no mention of (for example) the basing of USAF GLCMs at RAF Greenham Common. No connection is made between Airey Neave's murder and how she handled the IRA and INLA hunger strikes at The Maze.

During her decade as Prime Minister she was faced with violent leftists at home, a Marxist/Leninist insurgency in Northern Ireland, a Soviet Union that tried to menace Europe with SS-20s, and a band of South American thugs. She faced every challenge and left the UK peaceful, prosperous, and strong.

To watch the movie, you'd think she's done little but abandon her family in pursuit of ambition and fights.

I really don't think this movie does her justice.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
spoofproof
   03/02/12 09:45

Wife and I were amazed as Best Actress Streep dismissed non-elitists across the land with "Whatever!" and then gushed over the sweetness and light of her adoring audience even as she FAILED to even mention the name of Margaret Thatcher whose courage and tenacity made Streep's stupid Oscar possible. To paraphrase an old Crocker Bank commercial jingle made into a hit single by the Carpenters, Hollywood's miseries "have only just begun." Hollywood's problems go a lot deeper than the idiotic PC propaganda they produce. The deeper problem is reflected in the attitude of actor Dax Shepherd's Twitter comparison of the movie "Act of Valor" with Leni Riefenstahl's "Triumph of The Will." Anyone who would make such a comparison is deranged. Denizens of Tinsel Town in the majority believe such comparisons are apt. It's a sickness of the Soul.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Glenn X
   03/11/12 11:07

I knew this was gonna be a leftist hit-job on Thatcher as soon as a draft of the screenplay was leaked online and revealed that was the angle the filmmakers intended to take. It's bad enough that we have lefty Yanks in H'wood taking potshots at the Iron Lady -- but worse still, as socally mike 626626 mentioned, we have Thatcher's fellow Brits also dumping on her. On a trip to London several years back, I decided to take a sightseeing tour of the city, as it was my first time in the UK, and I was shocked to hear the tour guide talking smack about Mrs. Thatcher as we passed near her residence.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact