The mystery remaining about the Obama administration’s foreign policy is not whether it has worked, but whether its failures will matter all that much. That is no rhetorical question, given that it is hard to permanently damage, in just three years, the position abroad of the United States, given its vast military power and enormous economy.
The Obama administration’s policy was predicated on three assumptions. First, world tensions and widespread dislike of the United States were due to George Bush’s wars and his cowboyish style. Therefore, outreach and reset would correct the Bush mistakes — given that unrest did not really antedate, and would not postdate, the strutting Bush. The unique personal narrative and heritage of Obama and his tripartite name, of course, would earn America fides in inverse proportion to Bush’s twang and evangelical way of speaking about God.
Advertisement
Yet most problems really did transcend Bush, and so reset accomplished little. Hugo Chávez is more hostile to America than ever, whether symbolically by accusing the Obama administration of spreading cancer among Latin American leaders or concretely by entertaining Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. There is no new warmth from Cuba or Nicaragua — as there never could have been from their Stalinist heads of state.
Putin has as much contempt for Obama as he did for Bush. Our policies remain the same: trying to encourage Russian reform without causing a war or neo-Soviet adventurism.
The decision to reach out to Assad with recognition and an embassy failed; Syria became more unhinged and violent, not less. The verdict is still out on the Arab Spring; the Obama administration stopped taking credit for it once the illiberal Muslim Brotherhood began its ascendance. The Palestinians are now talking of a third intifada, and they hope that, when the shooting starts, their new friend the United States will hector Israel in a way it did not under Bush.
Outreach to Iran was a disaster; the serial face-to-face talks and the quiet neglect of the Iranian dissidents did not work. Now we are reduced to the sort of catch-up sanctions that would have earned Bush the charge of warmongering from the Left. Unofficial U.S policy seems to be a silent hope that tiny Israel does the unthinkable that a huge United States would not, while Saudi Arabia expands its pipelines to nullify the value of the Strait of Hormuz in a way we are refusing to do at home with Keystone.
Obama likes Prime Minister Erdogan even more than he hates Prime Minister Netanyahu. But what he thinks the Israelis have done to the Palestinians pales in comparison to what he must know the Turks have done to the Kurds, Greeks, and Armenians. It is open to question whether Erdogan will be calmed by such affability or will find it useful should he wish to settle old scores with the Kurds, on Cyprus, or in the Aegean.
Lecturing China while borrowing ever more money from it does not work.
I don’t think Japan and South Korea feel any safer with Obama in office — despite claims of a new focus on Asia at the expense of old Europe. The more Obama talks of eliminating nuclear weapons, the more both these neighbors of North Korea will probably consider acquiring them.
There is no need to review the reset flip side of estrangement from the Czech Republic, Britain, Israel, and now Canada — allies who believe in staid things like democracy, human rights, and alliances in times of peril. It is hard to calibrate U.S. policy toward the EU, since the entire enterprise is unraveling, and the Europeans seem puzzled that we are emulating the very failure they are learning from. Mexico is more violent and unstable than ever before, and more emboldened to sue U.S. states in American courts of law. Fast and Furious, promises not to deport any more illegal aliens, and the administration’s lawsuit against the state of Arizona did not have a warming effect on our relationship.
The second Obama idea was the dream of reenergizing the United Nations and working to eliminate all nuclear weapons. But the likelihood is that the atomic club will be larger, not smaller, when Obama leaves office. The madness of North Korea transcends the U.S. presidency, although for now it is playing out in ridiculous matters of succession.
Obama claimed he was doing U.N. work in Libya; but in truth he exceeded a U.N. mandate for humanitarian help and no-fly zones by stealthily bombing “from behind.” How odd that by ignoring the U.S. Congress and the War Powers Act and instead championing but not obeying the United Nations, Obama snubbed both in a way his cowboyish predecessor never had. Restricting oil leases on federal lands by 40 percent and stopping the Keystone pipeline did not translate into a gas-guzzling America’s doing its fair share to lower world oil prices and protect the global environment from careless new Third World exploration and exploitation.
If we experience a catastrophic economic implosion, his failures won’t matter a bit. We are heading in that direction and if it occurs we will be so engulfed in domestic strife, foreign affairs will not matter.
The evil-doers of the world will blithely go on their merry way grabbing power and spreading tyranny.. Fortunately enemies abroad will ignore us as likely they will be unable to wreak more havoc upon us then we have ourselves.
If economic calamity does not befall us, will you be disappointed? Folks like you do not seem to have a plan if things get better. And, if they get better then that would pretty much show that we don't really need the storm and stress of listening to conservorabble doomsayers any more.
I am still not going to quit being an optimist. it worked to get through W's administration.
VDH takes the long view that bellicose tin horn dictators will always be bellicose tin horn dictators. The job of the POTUS is to protect US citizens and our interests in a savage world.
It was liberals that thought electing a white guy with a cool name and tan skin would solve the world's problems.
I'm so glad Obama has kept the nation safe just like Bush, wait except for the fact that we haven't lost over 3,000 American lives on our soil and more than that in a war of choice that presented no clear and present danger. VDH you can blab blab all you want about foreign policy, just take a look out the tragic numbers above.
Your name should be Ugly American. Barry has handed the next president a middle east in more turmoil than he inherited it, far more unstable and with fewer allies than before. We are facing multiple Islamic states in the making that will have death to America displayed on the walls. When the next event here occurs on someone else's watch people like you would be the first to excuse Barry from fault.
Just like you conveniently excused Clinton for allowing Al Quaida to grow into the threat we face today.
well well. Bashing Obama on foreign policy is going to get tougher and tougher for the R partisans. As this column posted, another story of well aimed and muscular foreign policy broke, the Somalia rescue by SEAL Team 6. It appears that the military has no problems with this C in C and the current Secretary of D.
Also, at this point one would need to applaud the efforts of the extremely able Secretary of State. To start flailing at Obama's foreign policy seems to be a fool's errand. He has continued a steady progression of policies handed off by W, and has shown that the current administration can run with them and improve them. Amen to that.
Obama wins no matter what the scribblers kvetch about, and his global relationships are much more solid that the lamented W's were. The current occupant has the gift of capacity. So far, none of the contenders show any of that and little of anything else.
The great advantage that the D's have at this point is that they do not begin from a xenophobic anti-intellectual point. They seem to actually understand the utility of international relations and seem to be grasping realpolitik.
Too bad you couldn't rebut VHD's points, but instead chose to demagogue in the manner of your anti-xenophobic, intellectual commandant [or is that 'commander *and* chief', as he recently referred to himself?].
VDH misses the most important matter: despite Obama's transcendental incompetence and non-exceptionalist Weltanschauung, majorities of Americans (ignorant fools, they) say Obama is doing a good job on foreign policy or, more precisely, what they believe, spoon-fed by the MSM, to be his foreign policy. These concrete-bound Americans, lobotomized by our ossified educational system, obsessed with the Kardashians, hip-hop moguls, Hollywood glitterati, and illiterate tweets by professional athletes, can still question his economic policies because it's impossible to ignore reality that stares one in the face, even when "collectivism" can't even be defined by them, but we ought not mistake this opposition to be the result of actual cerebration. And this is how Republics die.
Oh great one that calls thyself the FreezeDriednews be merciful and show us the enlghtened path!!!
or as the concrete-bound labotomized majority Americans say GET LOST YOU IDIOT!!!
It appears the lefties have overtaken this forum, as evidenced by the above ad hominem and wonderfully creative spelling "labotomized." How far we have fallen when "get lost you idiot" (in all caps) is the rejoinder.
The only question in my mind is whether Obama continues to pursue this course of action through intransigent ignorance or with full appreciation of the likely consequences.
Obama has been very lucky so far in that he has not faced a foreign policy crisis. "Leading from behind" has been working pretty well so far but only as long as his luck holds out.
If an international crisis occurs, it may actually help Obama in the short run. When the Iranians took hostages in 1979, Carter's approval ratings went UP at first (rally around the flag), and only eventually fell later on when he couldn't do anything about the situation (highlighted by the failed rescue attempt).
If the Iranians had waited a few months, Reagan might not have been elected at all!
'Obama Wins in Global Poll Showing Investors Resist Gingrich" External Link
"U.S. investors are rooting for Mitt Romney and those outside the country are for Barack Obama. Newt Gingrich is generating little enthusiasm anywhere.
"The expectation in markets of every region is that Obama will be re-elected president in November, an outlook shared by 72 percent of respondents worldwide in a quarterly Bloomberg Global Poll of 1,209 Bloomberg customers who are investors, traders or analysts, conducted Jan. 23-24.
“The recent improvements of the economy will help Obama’s re-election” along with “the lack of coalition among the Republicans,” says Jason Vieira, an international analyst for the brokerage firm Cruzeiro do Sul Corretora in Sao Paulo and a poll respondent.
Victor it's silly and petulant of you to criticize Obama's foreign policy when you have yet to explain your atrocious judgement in the same area during the Bush years.
Under Obama, Bin Laden and Gaddafi are gone and Al-Qaeda is in tatters. Obama's targeted approach (compared to the Bush/Hanson model of invading and occupying countries that had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda) reaps massive national security benefits with minimal loss in blood and treasure.
Iran has been strengthened immeasurably by the policies you relentlessly supported Victor, but Obama has increased the sanctions and he's slowly strangling the regime and turning the tide there as well.
It's a fact that his methods get better results than the ones you have long advocated. You should leave the criticism to others better positioned to deliver it.