Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew


New on NRO . . .
Close
Releasing the Blind Sheikh?
It is too early to tell, but not too early to be very worried.

By Andrew C. McCarthy


Archive Latest RSS Send

Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman


Text  

The Arabic-language newspaper al-Arabiya reported on Tuesday that the Obama administration has offered to release Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman to Egypt. Abdel Rahman is the infamous “Blind Sheikh” who was convicted in 1995 for masterminding a terrorist war against the United States that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and a plot to bomb New York City landmarks. According to the late Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda’s founder, Abdel Rahman is also responsible for the fatwa — the necessary Islamic edict — that green-lighted the 9/11 attacks.

The alleged offer to release Abdel Rahman is said to be an effort to end the impasse over 16 American “civil-society activists” (including the son of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood) being detained by Egypt’s interim government. The Blind Sheikh, the report says, would be part of a prisoner exchange: 50 Egyptians swapped for the Americans whose organizations are said to have received foreign funding in violation of Egyptian law. (See my post from last week on efforts by senior Republican senators to secure the Americans’ release.) Speculation that a quid pro quo may be in place has intensified because, in recent days, Egyptian authorities suddenly adjourned the trial of the Americans and lifted the travel ban against seven of them, including Sam LaHood — freeing them to return to the U.S.

Advertisement

The al-Arabiya report is available only in Arabic so far, not on the newspaper’s English-language website. It was brought to the attention of the English-speaking blogosphere late Tuesday night by the indispensable Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch (see here). Through the intercession of Andrew Bostom, the website “Translating Jihad” has now published an English translation of the full story.

Blind since the age of four, the 73-year-old Abdel Rahman has been renowned in global Islamist circles as “the Emir of Jihad” since the 1970s. He is an al-Azhar University–educated sharia jurist and the leader of an Egyptian terrorist organization, Gama’at al-Islamiya (“the Islamic Group”). Like the Muslim Brotherhood, Gama’at purports to have renounced violence. Although he was acquitted by an Egyptian court for complicity in the 1981 slaying of Egyptian president Anwar Sadat, Abdel Rahman has bragged about issuing the fatwa that approved the killing. His fatwas calling on Muslims to murder Sadat’s successor, Hosni Mubarak, are numerous and notorious.

American immigration authorities permitted Abdel Rahman to settle in the United States in 1990, eventually giving him permanent residence status as a “religious worker,” even though his long history of inciting terror and his virulent anti-Americanism were well known — and even though his name appeared on U.S. terrorist watch lists.

I was the lead prosecutor at Abdel Rahman’s lengthy 1995 trial. A jury convicted him of conspiring to wage a war of urban terrorism against the United States, and of bombing conspiracy, solicitation of attacks on American military installations, and conspiring to murder — as well as soliciting the murder of — Mubarak. In January 1996, then–district judge (and later U.S. attorney general) Michael Mukasey sentenced Abdel Rahman to life imprisonment. The sheikh’s convictions and sentence were unanimously upheld on appeal. My book Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad details Abdel Rahman’s history and the investigation of the jihadist organization he built in the United States.

Egyptian Islamists have been agitating for Abdel Rahman’s release since we arrested him in New York City in July 1993. Some of this agitation has predictably crossed into barbarism. In 1997, Gama’at threatened to “target . . . all of those Americans who participated in subjecting [Abdel Rahman’s] life to danger” — “every American official, starting with the American president [down] to the despicable jailer.” The organization promised to do “everything in its power” to obtain his release. Six months later, Gama’at jihadists set upon 58 foreign tourists and several police officers at an archeological site in Luxor, Egypt, brutally shooting and slicing them to death. The terrorists left behind leaflets — including in the mutilated torso of one victim — demanding that the Blind Sheikh be freed.

1   2   3   Next >
Text  

You Might Also Like...

Hanson: The Bad-Good Idea of Removing Assad

Rosenthal: In Syria, America Allies with the Muslim Brotherhood

Krauthammer: While Syria Burns

Abrams: Egypt: Pity the Winner

Sexton: Assad: An Arab Problem

May: It’s Not the Arab Spring, It’s the Nahda



COMMENTS   63

EXPAND  

   03/01/12 06:19

Why shouldn't Obama release the man? He needs to do SOMETHING this week to debase the United States. I mean criminies, it's already Thursday.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Cecelia Mary
   03/01/12 07:02

Sorry, the president only releases political prisoners on Friday before a holiday weekend or before Congress recesses.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill Wilde
   03/01/12 10:41

Cecilia Mary, he's not a political prisoner, he was convicted on terrorism charges. President Obama will not release him 1) because of the immediate political firestorm that would ensue and 2) the horrible precedent he would set by making Americans the world over potential hostages for jihadists seeking to free their imprisoned brethren. Cordially, Bill

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 10:41

Good point. Look for the announcement on April 6 at 4:59 pm--Good Friday.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
James Drouin
   03/04/12 03:47

Fridays, after 5:00 PM.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
cmblake6
   03/01/12 09:23

Oh, that was sweet! Perfect comment.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
karl anglin
   03/03/12 16:37

I wish Obama could be released to Egypt
and be made to stay there!

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill Wilde
   03/03/12 22:17

Doc, it must be clear to you by now that this story is a hoax, one of Mr. McCarthy's journalistic pranks he indulges in every so often. Caveat lector. Cordially, Bill

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill Wilde
   03/06/12 16:51

The Americans who were unjustly charged are now home, no one released the blind dirtbag, and this story is exposed for what it always was: an obvious FRAUD. Mr. McCarthy, this is fraud number 2 for 2012 and it's only March. You've trashed your credibility for what? Cordially, Bill

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 08:29

i would like to think releasing him would be political suicide for obama but it wouldn't be because our blatantly progressive biased msm would spin it into something holy, righteous and pure just like they do everything the man says and does while demonizing anyone that has the gall to question him

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
natedogg
   03/01/12 11:29

You must be dense to believe Obama would release a terrorist in a prisoner swap. You all are simply absurd. Do you believe EVERYTHING YOU READ!?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 08:30

Is that Santa Claus hat supposed to gain our sympathy?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Drufolis
   03/01/12 21:46

Stop being snarky. That is a traditional muslim clerical headdress that resembles the classic Santa Claus hat to the extent that similar headresses were worn a few hundred years ago in the West as well.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/03/12 10:30

Does it have that little white poofy thing on the tip?

This terrorist deserves more than snarkiness.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 08:37

Two points: First, Abdel Rahman should never be released. His crimes against America and civilization in general require his permanent detention. Second, the Americans and other non-Egyptians who were involved in political activities are themselves to blame for their own plight. We're not talking about the Red Cross here (or the Red Crescent). LaHood should not have been there. Egypt's quasi-government has a sovereign right to detain them, regardless of how unfair it might seem to us. We should not barter for their release.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 08:39

It was once the position of many Western governments that they do not (officially) negotiate with terrorists. Well, since more and more governments in the Middle East are terrorist, I suspect the position may change. Terrorists are mainstreaming by virtue of becoming governments.

If the question here is, "Will Team Obama releases the Blind Sheik?"

My answer is, of course, how could he not? Oh, and the election year stuff, yes it would be disadvantageous perhaps for Obama for a news cycle; maybe two news cycles on Fox, but after that most Americans will forget Abdel Rahman’s name. And Obama will be spun by the MSM as a negotiating super-genius for the prisoner swap.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
cmblake6
   03/01/12 09:36

Negative quantity of excretory material. I'm supposing profound obscenities are not suitable on this site, so I won't say what I think.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
   03/01/12 10:43

cm, what facts do you have to back up your statement? When has Mr BHO NOT behaved as the writer to whom you responded suggested?

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Bill Wilde
   03/06/12 17:00

jhegstr, Well he hasn't and you fell for a story as phony as a three dollar bill. Next McCarthy will tell you he heard of Bin Laden having hot dogs in the oval office with the President, and all the gullible fools who believed this canard will believe that one too. Cordially, Bill

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
 Bugg
   03/01/12 08:39

How can releasing this murderous terrorist even be a considered? This makes the Marc Rich pardon(Eric Holder's most egregious act of imbecility as a Clinton hack)downright quaint.

If the Obama Adminstration does this, Articles of Impeachment need to be drafted forthwith. This animal tried to knock dow the WTC in 1993. 6 Americans were killed. If freed, he will try to kill more Americans. It's somewhere between insanity and treason to even raise this as a possibility.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse
Load More Comments

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact