How many times have you heard Barack Obama talk about “investing” in education? Quite a few, if you’ve been listening to the president at all.
In fact, Americans have been investing more and more in education over the years, led by presidents Democratic and Republican. But it’s become glaringly clear that we’re getting a pretty lousy return on these investments.
That’s been evident at the K–12 level for a long time. Teacher’s unions and education-school types have had custody of most of our public schools for more than three decades, during which time test results and high-school graduation rates have been mostly stagnant.
It has come to the point where Democratic politicians like former New York City schools superintendent Joel Klein, past and current Chicago mayors Richard M. Daley and Rahm Emanuel, Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, and Newark mayor Cory Booker have taken on the teacher’s unions.
Obama’s education secretary, Arne Duncan, deserves credit for doing a bit of this as well. All this, despite the fact that teacher unions funnel millions of taxpayer-funded dollars into Democratic campaigns.
On higher education, Democrats, and many Republicans, have followed the same course as the one they have followed with the public schools: Shovel in more money, in this case in the form of Pell grants and subsidized student loans.
College and university administrators have been happy to scoop up all the money by rapidly raising tuitions and fees. Higher-ed expenses have been rising much more rapidly than inflation for three decades.
And what has the money been spent on? Some of it presumably goes to professors in the hard sciences and the great scholars who have made American universities the best in the world. Well and good.
But many university administrators have other priorities. The University of California system has been raising tuitions and cutting departments. But, reports John Leo in the invaluable Minding the Campus blog, its San Diego campus found the money to create a new post of “vice chancellor for equity, diversity and inclusion.”
That’s in addition to what the Manhattan Institute’s Heather Mac Donald calls its “already massive diversity apparatus.” It takes Mac Donald 103 words just to list the titles of UCSD’s diversitycrats.
The money for the new vice chancellorship could have supported two of the three cancer researchers that the campus lost to Rice University in Houston, a private school that apparently takes the strange view that hard science is more important than diversity facilitators.
This doesn’t just happen on the left coast. The University of North Carolina at Wilmington saved some money by lumping together two science departments and raised spending on its five diversity/multicultural offices.