Google+
Close
Republicans Have Bad Brains?
Pseudo-scientific studies “find” that conservatives are close-minded by nature.

Chris Mooney, author of The Republican Brain

Text  


Jonah Goldberg

Translation: Conservatives literally aren’t smart enough to be spell-checkers at an M&M factory because they won’t be able to understand quickly enough that the occasional W is just an upside down M.

The data might be correct, but as with Mooney, the conclusions are beyond absurd. London’s Guardian newspaper responded to the study by declaring, “Scientists have found that the brains of people calling themselves liberals are more able to handle conflicting and unexpected information.” The Los Angeles Times announced in an editorial that the study “suggests that liberals are more adaptable than conservatives” and “might be better judges of the facts.”

Huh? The test didn’t measure “informational complexity.” It measured informational simplicity. As Slate’s science columnist William Saletan notes, the study actually excludes complexity and ambiguity. It measured response times to a rudimentary visual-acuity test. Almost by definition, conscious thought isn’t part of the equation. My hunch is that Socrates would do very poorly hunting and pecking for Ms and Ws on a screen, too.

Advertisement
Now it’s probably true that, on average, there are subtle differences between conservatives and liberals when it comes to cognition. But you don’t have to be “anti-science” to see how the scientists are wildly overreaching from the data. Indeed, there’s a huge definitional problem. Conservatives resist growth of the state, but that’s not the same thing as resisting change. After all, capitalism is among the most powerful agents of change in human history, and conservatives are the ones defending it. Meanwhile, liberals are downright reactionary about preserving the Great Society and New Deal.

A famous study asserts that Communist revolutionaries Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro were political conservatives because they resisted change once in power. If your algorithmic whirligig spits out the finding that Stalin, the global leader of Communism for two decades, and Castro, the global dashboard saint of recrudescent left-wing asininity, are “politically conservative,” it’s time to take the gadget out to a field and smash it with baseball bats like the printer in the movie Office Space.

Mooney, who recently explained in a speech that he has given up on the Enlightenment view that we’re all open to reason, doesn’t seem to realize where he’s heading with this nonsense. Never mind that this approach is inherently undemocratic and opens the door to “genetic” explanations for everybody’s political views — blacks, women, gays, etc. — it is also self-serving bigotry that allows liberals to justify their own closed-mindedness on the grounds that Republicans aren’t even worth listening to. After all, they’re just born that way.

— Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and the author of The Tyranny of Clichés. You can write to him by e-mail at [email protected], or via Twitter @JonahNRO.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

NRO Polls on LockerDome

Subscribe to National Review