Google+
Close
For Mitt Romney, It’s 1994
Obama, like Ted Kennedy, is making hay from Romney’s time at Bain.

Mitt Romney in 1994

Text  


Katrina Trinko

Nearly two decades ago, Teddy Kennedy placed attacks on Bain Capital at the centerpiece of his senate campaign. His prime target was Ampad, a Bain-owned company that had bought an Indiana plant. According to a recent biography, The Real Romney, “the day Ampad bought the factory, SCM [the former owner] fired the workers. Many were rehired, but at lesser wages and reduced benefits.” Kennedy’s campaign, the authors claim, seized on the opportunity to cast Romney as the villain, and made “six thirty-second TV spots featuring nine Ampad workers” that were “withering” in their criticism.

Now, the Obama campaign is hoping that the Ampad saga — including the follow-up story that around 200 employees lost their jobs when the plant closed in 1995 — will turn voters against Romney. Yesterday, the campaign released a six-minute video about Ampad, featuring interviews from angry former employees. A sample quote from a former employee: “To me, Mitt Romney takes from the poor and middle class  and gives to the rich. It’s just the opposite of Robin Hood.”

Advertisement
This isn’t the first time Team Obama has attacked Romney’s Bain record. The campaign recently targeted two other Bain-backed companies: GST Steel and Dade Behring. Both times, the Obama team cherry-picked their facts. With GST Steel, the campaign neglected to mention that Romney had not been working on the day-to-day business of Bain for around two years when GST Steel went bankrupt and 750 jobs were lost.

In the case of Dade Behring, a medical company that Bain had acquired, the president’s campaign took a harsh, if incomplete, line: “Romney’s business strategy wasn’t about strengthening companies and creating jobs for long-term economic growth,” Obama spokeswoman Lis Smith asserted in a statement last week. “It was about reaping quick profits for himself and his investors at the expense of workers and communities. . . . That’s what he did at Dade Behring — loaded the company up with debt, put it on a path to bankruptcy, and caused 850 workers to lose their jobs, all while he and his partners walked away with $242 million,” she added.

Obama’s team is working hard to exploit those layoffs. A former Dade Behring human-resources officer, Cindy Hewitt, detailed her experience at the company in a press conference organized by the campaign. According to the Tampa Bay Times, Hewitt said that she was concerned about a culture in which “businesses are used to generate wealth for a small number of people and businesses are run to the ground and the lifeblood is sucked out of [them] and all of their employees lose their jobs.”

It is true that 850 workers lost their jobs at a Miami plant. But, according to a source familiar with the company at the time, that plant was the “the oldest and the least inefficient plant” they operated and, in a declining industry, cuts had to be made somewhere.

“This was not one of those situations where somebody snapped their fingers and said, ‘Okay, we’re going to close this plant tomorrow.’ The plant was wound down over an extended period of time. There was a year of job fairs and other outplacement efforts that were made by the company, generous severance payments were made, and ultimately, about 80 percent of the people found other positions,” added the source.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review