Obama and Gitmo, &c.

Through the wire at Gitmo


Steven Spielberg has made a movie about Lincoln, and Reuters had a report about it last week. Let me quote a couple of paragraphs:

“Don’t let this political football play back and forth,” the Oscar-winning director said he urged distributors, noting the “confusing” aspect in the film that shows how U.S. political parties back in Lincoln’s time “traded political places over the last 150 years.”

In contrast to today, the Republican party to which Lincoln belonged was founded by anti-slavery activists and Republicans were often tagged “radicals.”

Funny, but I still think of the Republicans as a party of freedom, if not the party of freedom. I don’t think the parties have traded places. You?

Sowell wrote a column about Ann Coulter and her new book, Mugged. He mentioned Charles Pickering, the Mississippi judge whose elevation was blocked by Senate Democrats. They did so in their usual vile way: They called him a racist. In reality, he had been brave in the cause of civil rights, standing up to the Klan — at a time when that group was powerful and violent. Pickering and his family required FBI protection.

Sowell’s column reminded me of one of my favorite comments of all time. It was made by Charles Evers, brother of the slain civil-rights leader Medgar. He was talking about sentiment in Mississippi where Pickering was concerned. And he said, “The NAACP and the Klan are the only two organizations that are against him down here.”

Given what the NAACP has become, and the Klan always was, I say that is pretty good.

A story begins, “The Justice Department said Friday it is going to allow members of federally recognized Indian tribes to possess eagle feathers, although that’s a federal crime.”

This may present a dilemma for those who pride themselves on political correctness (whether they call it that or not). Yes, eagle protection. But Indians, sacred Indians. Oh, the dilemma! One’s head could start aching . . .

A headline reads, “Chinese scientist says prehistoric man ate pandas.” (Story here.) Good gravy! Can we prosecute prehistoric man? (Can we prosecute anyone who uses “man” that way?)

I now have my favorite burning of the year: “Afghan counternarcotics police poured gasoline on more than 24 tons of narcotics and other illegal substances, then set the pile ablaze on the outskirts of Kabul on Sunday . . .” (Story here.)

Was this a weird headline or what? “Centrist Sen. Specter died fighting for moderation.” (Story here.)

I liked this headline — sports-like: “At 0-32, gay-marriage forces seek 1st win at polls.” (Story here.)

Two Americans shared the Nobel “memorial prize” for economics. (The econ prize is not a real Nobel prize. I could get into it, but I don’t want to detain you, and I’m rushing.) One of those laureates is Lloyd Shapley, a professor emeritus at UCLA. I loved something he said:

“I consider myself a mathematician, and the award is for economics. I never, never in my life took a course in economics.”

You’ll find that quote in the Associated Press report. You’ll also find this:

Shapley is the son of renowned astronomer Harlow Shapley, whose work early in the 20th century included helping estimate the true size of the Milky Way galaxy.

“Now, I’m ahead of my father,” Shapley said. “He got other prizes . . . But he did not get a Nobel prize.”

Hmmm. A feeling of competitiveness, even now? Shapley père died in 1972. He was born in ’85. Fathers and sons can be interesting.

Speaking of things Nobel: I will be giving a talk in Darien, Conn., on Thursday night. The subject is the Nobel Peace Prize, about which I’ve written a history. The event is at the Darien Community Association (lovely place). The time is 7:30. For further details, please consult the Darien News, here.

A final Nobel thought. Shinya Yamanaka is a winner of this year’s prize in “physiology or medicine” (as Alfred Nobel designated this prize). He won for advances in stem-cell research. He wanted to exploit stem cells, but he did not want to destroy embryos. He figured out a way. His impetus was moral, and his achievement is both scientific and moral.

Our Rick Brookhiser sent me an e-mail: “Humbling. We all write and do this and that, and this guy solves a problem.”

Thank you, dear readers, and see you.

To order Jay Nordlinger’s new book, Peace, They Say: A History of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Most Famous and Controversial Prize in the World, go here. To order his collection Here, There & Everywhere, go here.


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

NRO Polls on LockerDome

Subscribe to National Review