11/03/00 2:15 p.m.
Tiberi v. O’Shaughnessy
An under-card worth watching.

By Kevin Holtsberry, freelance writer based in Ohio

s we enter the final weekend before the election and the Bush-Gore battle races to the end, one campaign here in Ohio — the Tiberi-O'Shaughnessy congressional battle — has become an interesting under-card to the title fight.

The two candidate's platforms and campaigns are practically mirror images of those at the top of the ticket. In a cycle where most congressional candidates are running on experience, personality, and local issues, this is unique.

Given that Bush is winning here, it is perhaps natural that Tiberi would seek to replicate his themes. What is somewhat surprising is that Tiberi — while still far from an exciting and dynamic speaker — has developed into an effective advocate for Bush's (and his own) agenda. A moderated question and answer session on public radio last night was a good illustration.

Gun Control
Tiberi has been attacked throughout the campaign for his support of concealed carry legislation. The early response involved positive ads dismissing the attacks as the tactics of the "past." Last night, when a caller challenged him on his "extremist" views, Tiberi responded intelligently. He reminded listeners that he was the only candidate awarded the Legislator of the Year by the Sheriffs Association and endorsed by the local FOP. He then explained how he was in favor of a well-drafted concealed carry law, one similar to those on the books in 42 other states, noting that these states have seen a decrease in crime — so they must be doing something right!

With this deft response he managed to assure voters that he was tough on crime, worked well with local law enforcement, and was knowledgeable about the effects of legislation nationally — far from an extremist. O'Shaughnessy could only babble about how guns frighten her and that she would be worried about criminals using her own gun against her!

Campaign Finance
When asked if he supported a ban on "soft money" Tiberi again gave a solid and effective answer. Despite its popularity and potential positives (a great deal of soft money was used against him both in the primary and in the current race), such a ban would violate the First Amendment. Tiberi noted that he would be willing to discuss corporate and union soft money bans, but preferred open and immediate disclosure. O'Shaughnessy, in contrast, lamely attempted to defend McCain-Fiengold stating she would love to be able to "sign" such legislation.

The Rest
On taxes, Social Security, Medicare, and other issues Tiberi calmly and effectively outlined the Republican agenda of limited government, market driven reform, and personal responsibility. Tiberi seemed better prepared, more comfortable with his issues, and confidant of success. His decision to forcefully defend Bush's themes and to integrate them into his own campaign seems to be paying off. Internal polls indicate he has gained and is holding a small but solid lead.

Democrats have been insisting that they win on the "issues." Pat Tiberi may just prove them wrong.