Google+
Close

Bench Memos

NRO’s home for judicial news and analysis.

Other Sound Voices



Text  



To take a break from exposing inanities, I’ll call attention to (1) this excellent Wall Street Journal op-ed from two years ago in which David Rivkin and Lee Casey explain that DOMA’s definition of marriage for purposes of federal law is constitutional, and (2) Matthew Spalding’s “Marriage and Faux Federalism,” which explains how George Will “gets his history and constitutional arguments wrong” on DOMA.



Text  


Sign up for free NRO e-mails today:

Subscribe to National Review