On Marriage and Religious Liberty

by Ed Whelan

In its amicus brief in the marriage cases, the Becket Fund set forth the severe conflicts that judicial imposition of same-sex marriage would pose to religious liberty, and it explained that the goal of avoiding such conflicts provided a rational basis for California voters, via Proposition 8, and Congress, via the federal Defense of Marriage Act, to preserve the traditional definition of marriage. In this follow-up post, Eric Rassbach of the Becket Fund details how the “briefs submitted in opposition to our amicus brief contradict each other—some say nothing to see here, move along; others say there are religious liberty problems but they are justified, or that they just need watching”—and fail to “convincingly refute our brief.”

Bench Memos

NRO’s home for judicial news and analysis.