2008—The California supreme court, by a vote of 4 to 3, invents a right to same-sex marriage under the state constitution.  Chief justice Ronald M. George’s majority opinion offers the usual false assurances that he’s not just making it up and imposing his own policy preferences.  Even more brazenly, George tries to defend his usurpation of the “people’s will” by arguing that the “provisions of the California Constitution itself constitute the ultimate expression of the people’s will.”  In a sense, yes—when those provisions are faithfully and properly interpreted and applied.  But not when judicial activists like George abuse them.

Six months later, California’s citizens vote to override the court’s ruling by approving Proposition 8, a measure that amends the state constitution to protect traditional marriage.  Perhaps plotting its next usurpation, the California supreme court is now considering various challenges to the validity and effect of Proposition 8.