Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

Bench Memos

NRO’s home for judicial news and analysis.


Print   |  Text
 

Patrial-Birth Decision

Did anyone seriously think that the Constitution requires us to let abortionists vacuum the brains of late-term unborn children out of their skulls?  What is remarkable is not the Court’s holding today, but the fact that anyone would think such a barbaric procedure, opposed by overwhelming majorities of Americans, is something the Constitution puts off limits for the people to decide through their elected representatives.   President Bush’s appointees to the Court — the Chief Justice and Justice Alito — have shown themselves to be  adherents of judicial restraint, who respect the power of the people to make their own choices on policy questions.  The Roberts Court has taken a positive, modest step in restoring a sense of reason and principle to constitutional adjudication on abortion.  Liberal pro-abortion extremists no longer have a blank check to railroad over the will of democratic majorities of the American people, and pro-abortion plaintiffs no longer have a privileged status as litigants in overturning reasonable abortion laws like this one based on irrationality and constitutional error.  And the Chief Justice has once again proven to be a wise leader of the Court:  assigning this opinion to Justice Kennedy underscores that even Justices not ”in the mold of Scalia and Thomas” are capable of upholding democracy and the Constitution when it comes to abortion.  

New on Bench Memos. . .


COMMENTS   0

EXPAND  

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.




* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact